An advantage for horizontal motion direction discrimination

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: An advantage for horizontal motion direction discrimination
Authors: Karin S. Pilz, Danai Papadaki
Contributors: University of Aberdeen.Psychology
Source: Vision Research. 158:164-172
Publisher Information: Elsevier BV, 2019.
Publication Year: 2019
Subject Terms: Adult, Male, CORTEX, BF Psychology, Adolescent, Horizontal motion, ORIENTATION ANISOTROPIES, Motion Perception, BF, Motion perception, Young Adult, 03 medical and health sciences, ASYMMETRIES, Discrimination, Psychological, 0302 clinical medicine, Orientation, Motion direction discrimination, Psychophysics, Humans, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, RECEPTIVE-FIELDS, PERCEPTION, VISUAL EXPERIENCE, 05 social sciences, ATTENTION, Oblique effect, STIMULI, Sensory Thresholds, PSYCHOPHYSICS, Female
Description: Discrimination performance is better for cardinal motion directions than for oblique ones, a phenomenon known as the oblique effect. In a first experiment of this paper, we tested the oblique effect for coarse motion direction discrimination and compared performance for the two cardinal and two diagonal motion directions. Our results provide evidence for the oblique effect for coarse motion direction discrimination. Interestingly, the oblique effect was larger between horizontal and diagonal than between vertical and diagonal motion directions. In a second experiment, we assessed fine motion direction discrimination for horizontal and vertical motion. It has been suggested that differences in performance strongly depend on motion coherence. Therefore, we tested performance at predetermined motion coherences of 30%, 40%, 50%, 60% and 70%. Unsurprisingly, performance overall increased with increasing motion coherence and angular deviations between control and test stimulus. More importantly, however, we found an advantage for horizontal over vertical fine motion direction discrimination. Noteworthy is the large variability in performance across experimental conditions in both experiments, which highlights the importance of considering individual difference when assessing perceptual phenomena within large groups of naïve participants.
Document Type: Article
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
ISSN: 0042-6989
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.03.005
Access URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30878277
https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/215cfcd6-3e8e-4e52-8ac2-393c5a48a400
https://hdl.handle.net/11370/215cfcd6-3e8e-4e52-8ac2-393c5a48a400
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2019.03.005
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30878277
https://aura-test.abdn.ac.uk/handle/2164/12675?show=full
https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/files/78206791/Pilz_Papadaki_VR_2019.pdf
https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/30878277
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30878277/
https://aura.abdn.ac.uk/handle/2164/13889
Rights: Elsevier Non-Commercial
taverne
Accession Number: edsair.doi.dedup.....bd8a367955d6e3ec01b562892d98b78c
Database: OpenAIRE
Description
Abstract:Discrimination performance is better for cardinal motion directions than for oblique ones, a phenomenon known as the oblique effect. In a first experiment of this paper, we tested the oblique effect for coarse motion direction discrimination and compared performance for the two cardinal and two diagonal motion directions. Our results provide evidence for the oblique effect for coarse motion direction discrimination. Interestingly, the oblique effect was larger between horizontal and diagonal than between vertical and diagonal motion directions. In a second experiment, we assessed fine motion direction discrimination for horizontal and vertical motion. It has been suggested that differences in performance strongly depend on motion coherence. Therefore, we tested performance at predetermined motion coherences of 30%, 40%, 50%, 60% and 70%. Unsurprisingly, performance overall increased with increasing motion coherence and angular deviations between control and test stimulus. More importantly, however, we found an advantage for horizontal over vertical fine motion direction discrimination. Noteworthy is the large variability in performance across experimental conditions in both experiments, which highlights the importance of considering individual difference when assessing perceptual phenomena within large groups of naïve participants.
ISSN:00426989
DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2019.03.005