In EDS ansehen

Challenges of Automated Decisions: Brief Report on Hungarian Experiences

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Challenges of Automated Decisions: Brief Report on Hungarian Experiences
Autoren: Csatlós, Erzsébet
Quelle: Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov: Series VII: Social Sciences, Law, Vol 17(66), Iss Special Issue, Pp 33-42 (2024)
Verlagsinformationen: Universitatea Transilvania Brasov, 2025.
Publikationsjahr: 2025
Schlagwörter: H1-99, QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science / számítástechnika, számítógéptudomány, Social Sciences, JF1338 Public administration / közigazgatás, legality, K Law (General) / jogtudomány általában, QA76.527 Network technologies / Internetworking / hálózati technológiák, hálózatosodás, 05.05. Jogtudomány, automatized decision - making, Social sciences (General), legal remedy, Law
Beschreibung: Automated decision-making plays a central role in shaping future public services. This paper examines judicial practices at the Administrative Tribunal of Szeged, highlighting challenges in cases involving automated decisions, including limited transparency and barriers to legal recourse. In Hungary, automated systems often function as ‘black boxes’, complicating the appeal process for affected individuals and limiting judicial oversight. This lack of transparency raises significant concerns about the fairness and legality of such decisions, pointing to the need for a robust regulatory framework.
Publikationsart: Article
Dateibeschreibung: text
ISSN: 2066-771X
2066-7701
DOI: 10.31926/but.ssl.2024.17.66.3.4
Rights: CC BY
Dokumentencode: edsair.doi.dedup.....ad0f28568ae9e3dc47e83f06c75f2d9f
Datenbank: OpenAIRE
Beschreibung
Abstract:Automated decision-making plays a central role in shaping future public services. This paper examines judicial practices at the Administrative Tribunal of Szeged, highlighting challenges in cases involving automated decisions, including limited transparency and barriers to legal recourse. In Hungary, automated systems often function as ‘black boxes’, complicating the appeal process for affected individuals and limiting judicial oversight. This lack of transparency raises significant concerns about the fairness and legality of such decisions, pointing to the need for a robust regulatory framework.
ISSN:2066771X
20667701
DOI:10.31926/but.ssl.2024.17.66.3.4