Entrustment Unpacked: Aligning Purposes, Stakes, and Processes to Enhance Learner Assessment: Aligning Purposes, Stakes, and Processes to Enhance Learner Assessment
Saved in:
| Title: | Entrustment Unpacked: Aligning Purposes, Stakes, and Processes to Enhance Learner Assessment: Aligning Purposes, Stakes, and Processes to Enhance Learner Assessment |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Cees P. M. van der Vleuten, Benjamin Kinnear, Daniel J. Schumacher, Holly Caretta-Weyer, Eric S. Holmboe, Eric J. Warm, David A. Turner |
| Source: | Academic Medicine. 96:S56-S63 |
| Publisher Information: | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2021. |
| Publication Year: | 2021 |
| Subject Terms: | Competency-Based Education/methods, Formative Feedback, 4. Education, Educational Measurement/methods, 02 engineering and technology, Competency-Based Education, Education, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Education, Medical, Graduate, Medical, Graduate/methods, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, Humans, Learning, Clinical Competence, Educational Measurement |
| Description: | Educators use entrustment, a common framework in competency-based medical education, in multiple ways, including frontline assessment instruments, learner feedback tools, and group decision making within promotions or competence committees. Within these multiple contexts, entrustment decisions can vary in purpose (i.e., intended use), stakes (i.e., perceived risk or consequences), and process (i.e., how entrustment is rendered). Each of these characteristics can be conceptualized as having 2 distinct poles: (1) purpose has formative and summative, (2) stakes has low and high, and (3) process has ad hoc and structured. For each characteristic, entrustment decisions often do not fall squarely at one pole or the other, but rather lie somewhere along a spectrum. While distinct, these continua can, and sometimes should, influence one another, and can be manipulated to optimally integrate entrustment within a program of assessment. In this article, the authors describe each of these continua and depict how key alignments between them can help optimize value when using entrustment in programmatic assessment within competency-based medical education. As they think through these continua, the authors will begin and end with a case study to demonstrate the practical application as it might occur in the clinical learning environment. |
| Document Type: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| ISSN: | 1040-2446 |
| DOI: | 10.1097/acm.0000000000004108 |
| Access URL: | https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2021/07001/Entrustment_Unpacked__Aligning_Purposes _Stakes .10.aspx https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34183603 https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/6e2363cd-f405-4e64-b54c-3af5918c9b09 https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004108 https://researchnow.flinders.edu.au/en/publications/entrustment-unpacked-aligning-purposes-stakes-and-processes-to-en https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34183603/ https://europepmc.org/article/MED/34183603 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34183603 |
| Rights: | taverne |
| Accession Number: | edsair.doi.dedup.....839454ee8ba508cfb7f3fa89096bf3aa |
| Database: | OpenAIRE |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___%3A%3A839454ee8ba508cfb7f3fa89096bf3aa Name: EDS - OpenAIRE (s4221598) Category: fullText Text: View record at OpenAIRE – Url: https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=EBSCO&SrcAuth=EBSCO&DestApp=WOS&ServiceName=TransferToWoS&DestLinkType=GeneralSearchSummary&Func=Links&author=van%20der%20Vleuten%20CPM Name: ISI Category: fullText Text: Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science Icon: https://imagesrvr.epnet.com/ls/20docs.gif MouseOverText: Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: edsair DbLabel: OpenAIRE An: edsair.doi.dedup.....839454ee8ba508cfb7f3fa89096bf3aa RelevancyScore: 904 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 904.0625 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Entrustment Unpacked: Aligning Purposes, Stakes, and Processes to Enhance Learner Assessment: Aligning Purposes, Stakes, and Processes to Enhance Learner Assessment – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cees+P%2E+M%2E+van+der+Vleuten%22">Cees P. M. van der Vleuten</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Benjamin+Kinnear%22">Benjamin Kinnear</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Daniel+J%2E+Schumacher%22">Daniel J. Schumacher</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Holly+Caretta-Weyer%22">Holly Caretta-Weyer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Eric+S%2E+Holmboe%22">Eric S. Holmboe</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Eric+J%2E+Warm%22">Eric J. Warm</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22David+A%2E+Turner%22">David A. Turner</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <i>Academic Medicine</i>. 96:S56-S63 – Name: Publisher Label: Publisher Information Group: PubInfo Data: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2021. – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Year Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Competency-Based+Education%2Fmethods%22">Competency-Based Education/methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Formative+Feedback%22">Formative Feedback</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%224%2E+Education%22">4. Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Measurement%2Fmethods%22">Educational Measurement/methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%2202+engineering+and+technology%22">02 engineering and technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Competency-Based+Education%22">Competency-Based Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Education%22">Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%2203+medical+and+health+sciences%22">03 medical and health sciences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%220302+clinical+medicine%22">0302 clinical medicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Education%2C+Medical%2C+Graduate%22">Education, Medical, Graduate</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical%22">Medical</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduate%2Fmethods%22">Graduate/methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%220202+electrical+engineering%2C+electronic+engineering%2C+information+engineering%22">0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Humans%22">Humans</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning%22">Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Clinical+Competence%22">Clinical Competence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Measurement%22">Educational Measurement</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Description Group: Ab Data: Educators use entrustment, a common framework in competency-based medical education, in multiple ways, including frontline assessment instruments, learner feedback tools, and group decision making within promotions or competence committees. Within these multiple contexts, entrustment decisions can vary in purpose (i.e., intended use), stakes (i.e., perceived risk or consequences), and process (i.e., how entrustment is rendered). Each of these characteristics can be conceptualized as having 2 distinct poles: (1) purpose has formative and summative, (2) stakes has low and high, and (3) process has ad hoc and structured. For each characteristic, entrustment decisions often do not fall squarely at one pole or the other, but rather lie somewhere along a spectrum. While distinct, these continua can, and sometimes should, influence one another, and can be manipulated to optimally integrate entrustment within a program of assessment. In this article, the authors describe each of these continua and depict how key alignments between them can help optimize value when using entrustment in programmatic assessment within competency-based medical education. As they think through these continua, the authors will begin and end with a case study to demonstrate the practical application as it might occur in the clinical learning environment. – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Article – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1040-2446 – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1097/acm.0000000000004108 – Name: URL Label: Access URL Group: URL Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2021/07001/Entrustment_Unpacked__Aligning_Purposes" linkWindow="_blank">https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2021/07001/Entrustment_Unpacked__Aligning_Purposes</link><br /><link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="_Stakes" linkWindow="_blank">_Stakes</link><br /><link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm=".10.aspx" linkWindow="_blank">.10.aspx</link><br /><link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34183603" linkWindow="_blank">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34183603</link><br /><link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/6e2363cd-f405-4e64-b54c-3af5918c9b09" linkWindow="_blank">https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/6e2363cd-f405-4e64-b54c-3af5918c9b09</link><br /><link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004108" linkWindow="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004108</link><br /><link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://researchnow.flinders.edu.au/en/publications/entrustment-unpacked-aligning-purposes-stakes-and-processes-to-en" linkWindow="_blank">https://researchnow.flinders.edu.au/en/publications/entrustment-unpacked-aligning-purposes-stakes-and-processes-to-en</link><br /><link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34183603/" linkWindow="_blank">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34183603/</link><br /><link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://europepmc.org/article/MED/34183603" linkWindow="_blank">https://europepmc.org/article/MED/34183603</link><br /><link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34183603" linkWindow="_blank">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34183603</link> – Name: Copyright Label: Rights Group: Cpyrght Data: taverne – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: edsair.doi.dedup.....839454ee8ba508cfb7f3fa89096bf3aa |
| PLink | https://erproxy.cvtisr.sk/sfx/access?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsair&AN=edsair.doi.dedup.....839454ee8ba508cfb7f3fa89096bf3aa |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1097/acm.0000000000004108 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 8 StartPage: S56 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Competency-Based Education/methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Formative Feedback Type: general – SubjectFull: 4. Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Measurement/methods Type: general – SubjectFull: 02 engineering and technology Type: general – SubjectFull: Competency-Based Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Education Type: general – SubjectFull: 03 medical and health sciences Type: general – SubjectFull: 0302 clinical medicine Type: general – SubjectFull: Education, Medical, Graduate Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical Type: general – SubjectFull: Graduate/methods Type: general – SubjectFull: 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering Type: general – SubjectFull: Humans Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Clinical Competence Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Measurement Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Entrustment Unpacked: Aligning Purposes, Stakes, and Processes to Enhance Learner Assessment: Aligning Purposes, Stakes, and Processes to Enhance Learner Assessment Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cees P. M. van der Vleuten – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Benjamin Kinnear – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Daniel J. Schumacher – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Holly Caretta-Weyer – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Eric S. Holmboe – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Eric J. Warm – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: David A. Turner IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 30 M: 06 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 10402446 – Type: issn-locals Value: edsair – Type: issn-locals Value: edsairFT Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 96 Titles: – TitleFull: Academic Medicine Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science