F, F., M, P., S, B., M, C., A, T., M, M., . . . U, P. (2024). Report from the HarmoSter study: Different LC-MS/MS androstenedione, DHEAS and testosterone methods compare well; however, unifying calibration is a double-edged sword: different LC-MS/MS androstenedione, DHEAS and testosterone methods compare well; however, unifying calibration is a double-edged sword. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 62, 1080. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-1138
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationF, Fanelli, et al. "Report from the HarmoSter Study: Different LC-MS/MS Androstenedione, DHEAS and Testosterone Methods Compare Well; However, Unifying Calibration Is a Double-edged Sword: Different LC-MS/MS Androstenedione, DHEAS and Testosterone Methods Compare Well; However, Unifying Calibration Is a Double-edged Sword." Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) 62 (2024): 1080. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-1138.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationF, Fanelli, et al. "Report from the HarmoSter Study: Different LC-MS/MS Androstenedione, DHEAS and Testosterone Methods Compare Well; However, Unifying Calibration Is a Double-edged Sword: Different LC-MS/MS Androstenedione, DHEAS and Testosterone Methods Compare Well; However, Unifying Calibration Is a Double-edged Sword." Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), vol. 62, 2024, p. 1080, https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-1138.