Linking chemical surface water monitoring and pesticide regulation in selected European countries
Uloženo v:
| Název: | Linking chemical surface water monitoring and pesticide regulation in selected European countries |
|---|---|
| Autoři: | Simon Spycher, Dennis Kalf, Joost Lahr, Mikaela Gönczi, Bodil Lindström, Emanuela Pace, Fabrizio Botta, Nolwenn Bougon, Pierre-François Staub, Kristina L. Hitzfeld, Oliver Weisner, Marion Junghans, Alexandra Kroll |
| Přispěvatelé: | Open Repository DS7.6 Demo |
| Zdroj: | Environ Sci Pollut Res Int |
| Informace o vydavateli: | Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2024. |
| Rok vydání: | 2024 |
| Témata: | Surface water, Research and Education Highlights, Environmental risk assessment, Risk Assessment, 01 natural sciences, Monitoring strategy, 6. Clean water, Europe, Pesticide regulation, 13. Climate action, Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis [MeSH], Europe [MeSH], Risk Assessment [MeSH], Plant protection products, Pesticides, Environmental Monitoring [MeSH], Pesticides/analysis [MeSH], Chemical monitoring, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Environmental Monitoring, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences |
| Popis: | The progress in chemical analytics and understanding of pesticide dynamics in surface waters allows establishing robust data on compounds with frequent exceedances of quality standards. The current chemical, temporal, and spatial coverage of the pesticide monitoring campaigns differs strongly between European countries. A questionnaire revealed differences in monitoring strategies in seven selected European countries; Nordic countries prioritize temporal coverage, while others focus on spatial coverage. Chemical coverage has increased, especially for non-polar classes like synthetic pyrethroids. Sweden combines monitoring data with agricultural practices for derived quantities, while the Netherlands emphasizes spatial coverage to trace contamination sources. None of the EU member states currently has established a process for linking chemical surface water monitoring data with regulatory risk assessment, while Switzerland has recently established a legally defined feedback loop. Due to their design and objectives, most strategies do not capture concentration peaks, especially 2-week composite samples, but also grab samples. Nevertheless, for substances that appear problematic in many data sets, the need for action is evident even without harmonization of monitoring programs. Harmonization would be beneficial, however, for cross-national assessment including risk reduction measures. |
| Druh dokumentu: | Article Other literature type |
| Jazyk: | English |
| ISSN: | 1614-7499 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11356-024-33865-y |
| Přístupová URL adresa: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38862805 https://repository.publisso.de/resource/frl:6490308 https://hdl.handle.net/10029/627715 |
| Rights: | CC BY |
| Přístupové číslo: | edsair.doi.dedup.....58e5ed3fecd577d6fa52a0f7c29e9a0a |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstrakt: | The progress in chemical analytics and understanding of pesticide dynamics in surface waters allows establishing robust data on compounds with frequent exceedances of quality standards. The current chemical, temporal, and spatial coverage of the pesticide monitoring campaigns differs strongly between European countries. A questionnaire revealed differences in monitoring strategies in seven selected European countries; Nordic countries prioritize temporal coverage, while others focus on spatial coverage. Chemical coverage has increased, especially for non-polar classes like synthetic pyrethroids. Sweden combines monitoring data with agricultural practices for derived quantities, while the Netherlands emphasizes spatial coverage to trace contamination sources. None of the EU member states currently has established a process for linking chemical surface water monitoring data with regulatory risk assessment, while Switzerland has recently established a legally defined feedback loop. Due to their design and objectives, most strategies do not capture concentration peaks, especially 2-week composite samples, but also grab samples. Nevertheless, for substances that appear problematic in many data sets, the need for action is evident even without harmonization of monitoring programs. Harmonization would be beneficial, however, for cross-national assessment including risk reduction measures. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 16147499 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11356-024-33865-y |