Zobraziť v EDS

The Laziness Singularity: When Doing Nothing Is the Only Rational Choice

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Názov: The Laziness Singularity: When Doing Nothing Is the Only Rational Choice
Autori: Tan, Kwan Hong
Informácie o vydavateľovi: Zenodo, 2025.
Rok vydania: 2025
Predmety: human performance, Economics, Behavioral/history, Cognitive Neuroscience, behavioral economics, Cognitive Neuroscience/economics, attention economics, Strategic laziness, Cognitive Neuroscience/trends, default mode network, laziness, creative cognition, Behavioral Symptoms/economics, Behavior Therapy/economics, Cognitive Neuroscience/legislation & jurisprudence, Cognitive Neuroscience/classification, Cognitive Neuroscience/instrumentation, Cognitive Neuroscience/methods, Complexity Theory, Cognitive Neuroscience/education, Cognitive Neuroscience/statistics & numerical data, Economics, Behavioral/trends, cognitive resource allocation, Economics, Behavioral, Default Mode Network, Cognitive neuroscience, human performance optimization, Cognitive Neuroscience/history, Cognitive Neuroscience/ethics, Behavioral Research/economics, Cognitive Neuroscience/organization & administration, decision fatigue, Cognitive Strategies, Behavioral Sciences/economics, Cognitive Neuroscience/standards, Economics, Behavioral/statistics & numerical data
Popis: In an era of infinite distractions and relentless productivity demands, this paper presents a counterintuitive thesis: strategic laziness represents the optimal cognitive strategy for maximizing creativity and long-term performance in complex systems. Drawing from behavioral economics, cognitive neuroscience, and complexity theory, we develop computational models demonstrating that "doing less" can paradoxically yield superior outcomes through three convergent mechanisms: (1) cognitive resource conservation preventing decision fatigue, (2) default mode network activation enabling creative insight, and (3) self-organizational emergence from reduced top-down control. Our mathematical analysis reveals that optimal effort levels are significantly lower than conventional wisdom suggests, with peak performance occurring at moderate activity levels (≈4.1 on a 10-point scale) and balanced focus-rest ratios (50:50). These findings challenge fundamental assumptions about productivity and suggest that the "laziness singularity"—a critical threshold where strategic inaction becomes more valuable than action—may represent an evolutionary adaptation to information-rich environments. The implications extend beyond individual cognition to organizational design, educational policy, and societal structures that currently penalize the very behaviors that optimize human potential.
Druh dokumentu: Article
Jazyk: English
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17063409
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17063408
Rights: CC BY
Prístupové číslo: edsair.doi.dedup.....540cd1e9cc41f5c431fd78f971e42e96
Databáza: OpenAIRE
Popis
Abstrakt:In an era of infinite distractions and relentless productivity demands, this paper presents a counterintuitive thesis: strategic laziness represents the optimal cognitive strategy for maximizing creativity and long-term performance in complex systems. Drawing from behavioral economics, cognitive neuroscience, and complexity theory, we develop computational models demonstrating that "doing less" can paradoxically yield superior outcomes through three convergent mechanisms: (1) cognitive resource conservation preventing decision fatigue, (2) default mode network activation enabling creative insight, and (3) self-organizational emergence from reduced top-down control. Our mathematical analysis reveals that optimal effort levels are significantly lower than conventional wisdom suggests, with peak performance occurring at moderate activity levels (≈4.1 on a 10-point scale) and balanced focus-rest ratios (50:50). These findings challenge fundamental assumptions about productivity and suggest that the "laziness singularity"—a critical threshold where strategic inaction becomes more valuable than action—may represent an evolutionary adaptation to information-rich environments. The implications extend beyond individual cognition to organizational design, educational policy, and societal structures that currently penalize the very behaviors that optimize human potential.
DOI:10.5281/zenodo.17063409