Insights and Applications - Participatory Democracy, Representative Democracy, and the Nature of Diffuse and Concentrated Interests: A Case Study of Public Involvement on a National Forest District

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Insights and Applications - Participatory Democracy, Representative Democracy, and the Nature of Diffuse and Concentrated Interests: A Case Study of Public Involvement on a National Forest District
Autoři: Christine Overdevest
Zdroj: Society & Natural Resources. 13:685-696
Informace o vydavateli: Informa UK Limited, 2000.
Rok vydání: 2000
Témata: 05 social sciences, 10. No inequality, 16. Peace & justice, 01 natural sciences, 0506 political science, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Popis: To evaluate whether public involvement on a national forest district fairly represents the public's values, this article proposes four hypothesis tests. First, it is hypothesized that public-involvement programs operate according to a participatory democracy logic, in which broad cross sections of the public participate in public involvement opportunities. A second hypothesis is tested that public involvement reflects a representative democracy process in which interest groups participate yet represent the underlying distribution of issue interests of the public at large. Because the findings indicate that interest groups do outcompete the public in participation, two additional perspectives are entertained. A political economic perspective is considered that posits that the incentive structure characterizing different interests defines participation. This perspective is contrasted with a perspective that argues that environmental "elites" prevail in participation and in the process misrepresent the publi...
Druh dokumentu: Article
Jazyk: English
ISSN: 1521-0723
0894-1920
DOI: 10.1080/08941920050121945
Přístupová URL adresa: https://srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/ja/ja_overdevest001.pdf
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08941920050121945
Přístupové číslo: edsair.doi.dedup.....4d3950b9972016ceb51ee34a845dea89
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Popis
Abstrakt:To evaluate whether public involvement on a national forest district fairly represents the public's values, this article proposes four hypothesis tests. First, it is hypothesized that public-involvement programs operate according to a participatory democracy logic, in which broad cross sections of the public participate in public involvement opportunities. A second hypothesis is tested that public involvement reflects a representative democracy process in which interest groups participate yet represent the underlying distribution of issue interests of the public at large. Because the findings indicate that interest groups do outcompete the public in participation, two additional perspectives are entertained. A political economic perspective is considered that posits that the incentive structure characterizing different interests defines participation. This perspective is contrasted with a perspective that argues that environmental "elites" prevail in participation and in the process misrepresent the publi...
ISSN:15210723
08941920
DOI:10.1080/08941920050121945