Идеологическая борьба в Верховном Совете Армении в процессе разработки Конституции 1995 года: к вопросу о политическом контексте и ценностных ориентирах / Ideological Struggle in the Supreme Council of Armenia During the Drafting of the 1995 Constitution: On the Political Context and Value Orientations

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Идеологическая борьба в Верховном Совете Армении в процессе разработки Конституции 1995 года: к вопросу о политическом контексте и ценностных ориентирах / Ideological Struggle in the Supreme Council of Armenia During the Drafting of the 1995 Constitution: On the Political Context and Value Orientations
Autoren: Lilit S. Zakaryan
Quelle: Регион и мир / Region and the World. :48-53
Verlagsinformationen: Public Institute of Political & Social Research of Blacksea-Caspian Region, 2025.
Publikationsjahr: 2025
Beschreibung: The article is devoted to the analysis of ideological confrontation among the factions of the Supreme Council of Armenia during the drafting and adoption of the 1995 Constitution. It examines key disagreements related to the form of government, the model of statehood, and the symbolic representation of the nation. The Constitution is interpreted as a result of political compromises and ideological clashes, including between advocates of presidential and parliamentary systems. Special attention is given to the textual analysis of the Constitution, which intertwines liberal and nationalist components․
Publikationsart: Article
ISSN: 1829-2437
DOI: 10.58587/18292437-2025.4-48
Dokumentencode: edsair.doi...........9d2d9825d16345cc33acb606c2bd6d10
Datenbank: OpenAIRE
Beschreibung
Abstract:The article is devoted to the analysis of ideological confrontation among the factions of the Supreme Council of Armenia during the drafting and adoption of the 1995 Constitution. It examines key disagreements related to the form of government, the model of statehood, and the symbolic representation of the nation. The Constitution is interpreted as a result of political compromises and ideological clashes, including between advocates of presidential and parliamentary systems. Special attention is given to the textual analysis of the Constitution, which intertwines liberal and nationalist components․
ISSN:18292437
DOI:10.58587/18292437-2025.4-48