Zobrazit v EDS

Cross-national achievement studies: learning from South Africa's participation in the trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS)

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Cross-national achievement studies: learning from South Africa's participation in the trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS)
Autoři: Human Sciences Research Council
Informace o vydavateli: HSRC, 2025.
Rok vydání: 2025
Témata: Cross-national achievement studies: learning from South Africa's participation in the trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS)
Popis: This article explores the potential of cross-national achievement studies through a critical reflection upon the experience of South Africa's participation in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science study (TIMSS). There are a growing number of multi-country and international achievement studies. While recognizing the limitations of these studies, this article considers how far these studies can be an effective tool for the generation of in-country information that can usefully inform policy and practice. It is argued that improvements can be made by using a simpler methodology for the analysis and presentation of information; better ways of analyzing the influence of domestic dimensions of poverty, inequality and social stratification; and improved strategies for assessing progress over time against national baselines. The article concludes with a set of questions for systems to consider when thinking about participating in international or multi-country achievement studies.
Druh dokumentu: Article
Jazyk: English
DOI: 10.14749/30127579
Přístupové číslo: edsair.doi...........8b9cc6d04ea263298c436da64ec2ab75
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Popis
Abstrakt:This article explores the potential of cross-national achievement studies through a critical reflection upon the experience of South Africa's participation in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science study (TIMSS). There are a growing number of multi-country and international achievement studies. While recognizing the limitations of these studies, this article considers how far these studies can be an effective tool for the generation of in-country information that can usefully inform policy and practice. It is argued that improvements can be made by using a simpler methodology for the analysis and presentation of information; better ways of analyzing the influence of domestic dimensions of poverty, inequality and social stratification; and improved strategies for assessing progress over time against national baselines. The article concludes with a set of questions for systems to consider when thinking about participating in international or multi-country achievement studies.
DOI:10.14749/30127579