Rules for epistemically oriented argumentative dialogues
Saved in:
| Title: | Rules for epistemically oriented argumentative dialogues |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Lumer, Christoph |
| Contributors: | Boogaart, Ronny, Garssen, Bart, Jansen, Henrike, Van Leeuwen, Maarten, Pilgram, Roosmaryn, Reuneker, Alex |
| Publisher Information: | Sic Sat, 2024. |
| Publication Year: | 2024 |
| Subject Terms: | cooperative dialogues, increasing degree of certainty, cooperative search for truth, effectiveness, aims of discourses, sequence rules, epistemically oriented argumentative dialogues, Argumentative dialogues, epistemic orientation, epistemological theory of argumentation, rules for argumentative dialogues, cooperative dialogues, rationally justified consensus, disputation, doxastic conditions |
| Description: | In the current argumentation-theoretical discussion as well as in Walton and Krabbe's (1995) list of argumentative dialogue types, no attention is paid to truly epistemically oriented dialogues that serve the cooperative and argumentative search for truth―called "discourses". The paper attempts to fill this gap. (1) After a more precise determination of the desired conditions for such discourses (among others, epistemic goal, effectiveness, cooperativeness, argumentativeness, efficiency) (2) the game 'Disputation' (Lumer 1988) is presented and shown to fulfil these conditions, (3) while other discourse systems from the literature fall (mostly far) short of the conditions. |
| Document Type: | Conference object Article |
| File Description: | application/pdf |
| Language: | English |
| Access URL: | https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/access/item:4107852/view https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1273275 https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4107851 |
| Rights: | CC BY |
| Accession Number: | edsair.dedup.wf.002..4ba9ea6c4e57e5ffa6633e5cc0a60c90 |
| Database: | OpenAIRE |
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstract: | In the current argumentation-theoretical discussion as well as in Walton and Krabbe's (1995) list of argumentative dialogue types, no attention is paid to truly epistemically oriented dialogues that serve the cooperative and argumentative search for truth―called "discourses". The paper attempts to fill this gap. (1) After a more precise determination of the desired conditions for such discourses (among others, epistemic goal, effectiveness, cooperativeness, argumentativeness, efficiency) (2) the game 'Disputation' (Lumer 1988) is presented and shown to fulfil these conditions, (3) while other discourse systems from the literature fall (mostly far) short of the conditions. |
|---|