In EDS ansehen

Experimental and In Silico Approaches to Study Carboxylesterase Substrate Specificity.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Experimental and In Silico Approaches to Study Carboxylesterase Substrate Specificity.
Autoren: Ribone, Sergio R., Quevedo, Mario Alfredo
Quelle: Journal of Xenobiotics; Feb2026, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p11, 26p
Schlagwörter: CARBOXYLESTERASES, DRUG metabolism, DRUG design, HYBRID computer simulation, MOLECULAR docking, BIOCATALYSIS, MOLECULAR recognition, MOLECULAR dynamics
Abstract: Human carboxylesterases (CES) are enzymes that play a central role in the metabolism and biotransformation of diverse endogenous substances and xenobiotics. The two most relevant isoforms, CES1 and CES2, are crucial in clinical pharmacotherapy as they catalyze the hydrolysis of numerous approved drugs and prodrugs. Elucidating the structural basis of CES isoform substrate specificity is essential not only for understanding and anticipating the biological fate of administered drugs, but also for designing prodrugs with optimized site-specific bioactivation. Additionally, this knowledge is also important for the design of biomedically useful molecules such as subtype-targeted CES inhibitors and fluorescent probes. In this context, both experimental and computational methodologies have been used to explore the mechanistic and thermodynamic properties of CES-mediated catalysis. Experimental designs commonly employ recombinant CES or human tissue microsomes as enzyme sources, utilizing quantification methods such as spectrophotometry (UV and fluorescence) and mass spectrometry. Computational approaches fall into two categories: (1) modeling substrate: CES recognition and affinity (molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and free-energy binding calculations), and (2) modeling substrate: CES reaction coordinates (hybrid QM/MM simulations). While experimental and theoretical approaches are highly synergistic in studying the catalytic properties of CES subtypes, they represent distinct technical and scientific fields. This review aims to provide an integrated discussion of the key concepts and the interplay between the most commonly used wet-lab and dry-lab strategies for investigating CES catalytic activity. We hope this report will serve as a concise resource for researchers exploring CES isoform specificity, enabling them to effectively utilize both experimental and computational methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Xenobiotics is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Datenbank: Biomedical Index
Beschreibung
Abstract:Human carboxylesterases (CES) are enzymes that play a central role in the metabolism and biotransformation of diverse endogenous substances and xenobiotics. The two most relevant isoforms, CES1 and CES2, are crucial in clinical pharmacotherapy as they catalyze the hydrolysis of numerous approved drugs and prodrugs. Elucidating the structural basis of CES isoform substrate specificity is essential not only for understanding and anticipating the biological fate of administered drugs, but also for designing prodrugs with optimized site-specific bioactivation. Additionally, this knowledge is also important for the design of biomedically useful molecules such as subtype-targeted CES inhibitors and fluorescent probes. In this context, both experimental and computational methodologies have been used to explore the mechanistic and thermodynamic properties of CES-mediated catalysis. Experimental designs commonly employ recombinant CES or human tissue microsomes as enzyme sources, utilizing quantification methods such as spectrophotometry (UV and fluorescence) and mass spectrometry. Computational approaches fall into two categories: (1) modeling substrate: CES recognition and affinity (molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and free-energy binding calculations), and (2) modeling substrate: CES reaction coordinates (hybrid QM/MM simulations). While experimental and theoretical approaches are highly synergistic in studying the catalytic properties of CES subtypes, they represent distinct technical and scientific fields. This review aims to provide an integrated discussion of the key concepts and the interplay between the most commonly used wet-lab and dry-lab strategies for investigating CES catalytic activity. We hope this report will serve as a concise resource for researchers exploring CES isoform specificity, enabling them to effectively utilize both experimental and computational methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:20394705
DOI:10.3390/jox16010011