In EDS ansehen

Using an anesthesia information management system to prove a deficit in voluntary reporting of adverse events in a quality assurance program.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Using an anesthesia information management system to prove a deficit in voluntary reporting of adverse events in a quality assurance program.
Autoren: Benson, Matthias, Junger, Axel, Fuchs, Carsten, Quinzio, Lorenzo, Böttger, Sebastian, Jost, Andreas, Uphus, Dirk, Hempelmann, Gunter, Benson, M, Junger, A, Fuchs, C, Quinzio, L, Böttger, S, Jost, A, Uphus, D, Hempelmann, G
Quelle: Journal of Clinical Monitoring & Computing; Mar2000, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p211-217, 7p
Abstract: Objective: A deficit is suspected in the manual documentation of adverse events in quality assurance programs in anesthesiology. In order to verify and quantify this, we retrospectively compared the incidence of manually recorded perioperative adverse events with automatically detected events.Methods: In 1998, data of all anesthetic procedures, including the data set for quality assurance of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI), was recorded online with the Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS) NarkoData4 (Imeso GmbH). SQL (Structured Query Language) queries based on medical data were defined for the automatic detection of common adverse events. The definition of the SQL statements had to be in accordance with the definition of the DGAI for perioperative adverse events: A potentially harmful change of parameters led to therapeutic interventions by an anesthesiologist.Results: During 16,019 surgical procedures, anesthesiologists recorded 911 (5.7%) adverse events manually, whereas 2966 (18.7%) events from the same database were detected automatically. With the exception of hypoxemia, the incidence of automatically detected events was considerably higher than that of manually recorded events. Fourteen and a half percent (435) of all automatically detected events were recorded manually.Conclusion: Using automatic detection, we were able to prove a considerable deficit in the documentation of adverse events according to the guidelines of the German quality assurance program in anesthesiology. Based on the data from manual recording, the results of the quality assurance of our department match those of other comparable German departments. Thus, we are of the opinion that manual incident reporting seriously underestimates the true occurrence rate of incidents. This brings into question the validity of quality assurance comparisons based on manually recorded data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Clinical Monitoring & Computing is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Datenbank: Complementary Index
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://resolver.ebscohost.com/openurl?sid=EBSCO:edb&genre=article&issn=13871307&ISBN=&volume=16&issue=3&date=20000315&spage=211&pages=211-217&title=Journal of Clinical Monitoring & Computing&atitle=Using%20an%20anesthesia%20information%20management%20system%20to%20prove%20a%20deficit%20in%20voluntary%20reporting%20of%20adverse%20events%20in%20a%20quality%20assurance%20program.&aulast=Benson%2C%20Matthias&id=DOI:10.1023/A:1009977917319
    Name: Full Text Finder
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text Finder
    Icon: https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/branding/images/FTF.gif
    MouseOverText: Full Text Finder
  – Url: https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=EBSCO&SrcAuth=EBSCO&DestApp=WOS&ServiceName=TransferToWoS&DestLinkType=GeneralSearchSummary&Func=Links&author=Benson%20M
    Name: ISI
    Category: fullText
    Text: Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science
    Icon: https://imagesrvr.epnet.com/ls/20docs.gif
    MouseOverText: Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science
Header DbId: edb
DbLabel: Complementary Index
An: 50039375
RelevancyScore: 831
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 830.91162109375
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Using an anesthesia information management system to prove a deficit in voluntary reporting of adverse events in a quality assurance program.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Benson%2C+Matthias%22">Benson, Matthias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Junger%2C+Axel%22">Junger, Axel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fuchs%2C+Carsten%22">Fuchs, Carsten</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Quinzio%2C+Lorenzo%22">Quinzio, Lorenzo</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Böttger%2C+Sebastian%22">Böttger, Sebastian</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jost%2C+Andreas%22">Jost, Andreas</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Uphus%2C+Dirk%22">Uphus, Dirk</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hempelmann%2C+Gunter%22">Hempelmann, Gunter</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Benson%2C+M%22">Benson, M</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Junger%2C+A%22">Junger, A</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fuchs%2C+C%22">Fuchs, C</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Quinzio%2C+L%22">Quinzio, L</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Böttger%2C+S%22">Böttger, S</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jost%2C+A%22">Jost, A</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Uphus%2C+D%22">Uphus, D</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hempelmann%2C+G%22">Hempelmann, G</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: Journal of Clinical Monitoring & Computing; Mar2000, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p211-217, 7p
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: <bold>Objective: </bold>A deficit is suspected in the manual documentation of adverse events in quality assurance programs in anesthesiology. In order to verify and quantify this, we retrospectively compared the incidence of manually recorded perioperative adverse events with automatically detected events.<bold>Methods: </bold>In 1998, data of all anesthetic procedures, including the data set for quality assurance of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI), was recorded online with the Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS) NarkoData4 (Imeso GmbH). SQL (Structured Query Language) queries based on medical data were defined for the automatic detection of common adverse events. The definition of the SQL statements had to be in accordance with the definition of the DGAI for perioperative adverse events: A potentially harmful change of parameters led to therapeutic interventions by an anesthesiologist.<bold>Results: </bold>During 16,019 surgical procedures, anesthesiologists recorded 911 (5.7%) adverse events manually, whereas 2966 (18.7%) events from the same database were detected automatically. With the exception of hypoxemia, the incidence of automatically detected events was considerably higher than that of manually recorded events. Fourteen and a half percent (435) of all automatically detected events were recorded manually.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Using automatic detection, we were able to prove a considerable deficit in the documentation of adverse events according to the guidelines of the German quality assurance program in anesthesiology. Based on the data from manual recording, the results of the quality assurance of our department match those of other comparable German departments. Thus, we are of the opinion that manual incident reporting seriously underestimates the true occurrence rate of incidents. This brings into question the validity of quality assurance comparisons based on manually recorded data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: Abstract
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Clinical Monitoring & Computing is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://erproxy.cvtisr.sk/sfx/access?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edb&AN=50039375
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1023/A:1009977917319
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 7
        StartPage: 211
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Using an anesthesia information management system to prove a deficit in voluntary reporting of adverse events in a quality assurance program.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Benson, Matthias
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Junger, Axel
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fuchs, Carsten
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Quinzio, Lorenzo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Böttger, Sebastian
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jost, Andreas
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Uphus, Dirk
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hempelmann, Gunter
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Benson, M
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Junger, A
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fuchs, C
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Quinzio, L
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Böttger, S
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jost, A
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Uphus, D
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hempelmann, G
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 15
              M: 03
              Text: Mar2000
              Type: published
              Y: 2000
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 13871307
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 16
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Clinical Monitoring & Computing
              Type: main
ResultId 1