What is a “Good” figure: Scoring of biomedical data visualization.
Saved in:
| Title: | What is a “Good” figure: Scoring of biomedical data visualization. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Torres, Hector, Ozturk, Efe, Fang, Zhou, Zhang, Nicholas, Cai, Shuangyi, Sarkar, Neel, Coskun, Ahmet F. |
| Source: | PLoS ONE; 11/26/2025, Vol. 20 Issue 11, p1-18, 18p, 4 Diagrams, 2 Charts, 2 Graphs |
| Abstract: | Biomedical data visualization is critical for interpreting complex datasets, yet the clarity and quality of visualizations vary widely across tools and applications. This study introduces a comprehensive framework for evaluating biomedical figures and benchmarking visualization platforms. We developed Metrics for Evaluation and Discretization of Biomedical Visuals using an Iterative Scoring algorithm (M.E.D.V.I.S.), a quantification system that systematically assesses figure quality based on four criteria: Complexity, color usage, whitespace, and the number of distinct visualizations. The algorithm integrates dimensionality reduction, clustering, and thresholding to classify figures and generate tailored feedback for improvement. In parallel, we conducted a comparative analysis of 26 widely used visualization tools, evaluating each based on ease of use, customizability, financial cost, and required background knowledge. To demonstrate real-world applicability, we present case studies on figure evaluation in published research and introduce SpatioView, an interactive, browser-based platform for exploring spatial omics data. Collectively, our findings highlight the need for standardized evaluation methods and provide accessible solutions for improving figure design in biomedical research, education, and industry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of PLoS ONE is the property of Public Library of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Complementary Index |
Full Text 
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science Be the first to leave a comment!