Multivariate Decoding and Drift-Diffusion Modeling Reveal Adaptive Control in Trilingual Comprehension.
Saved in:
| Title: | Multivariate Decoding and Drift-Diffusion Modeling Reveal Adaptive Control in Trilingual Comprehension. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Wang, Yuanbo, Meng, Yingfang, Yang, Qiuyue, Wang, Ruiming |
| Source: | Brain Sciences (2076-3425); Oct2025, Vol. 15 Issue 10, p1046, 30p |
| Subject Terms: | ADAPTIVE control systems, MULTILINGUALISM, LINGUISTIC context, NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, DRIFT diffusion models, CONTROL (Psychology), MULTIVARIATE analysis |
| Abstract: | Background/Objectives: The Adaptive Control Hypothesis posits varying control demands across language contexts in production, but its role in comprehension is underexplored. We investigated if trilinguals, who manage three dual-language contexts (L1–L2, L2–L3, L1–L3), exhibit differential proactive and reactive control demands during comprehension across these contexts. Methods: Thirty-six Uyghur–Chinese–English trilinguals completed an auditory word-picture matching task across three dual-language contexts during EEG recording. We employed behavioral analysis, drift-diffusion modeling, event-related potential (ERP) analysis, and multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) to examine comprehension efficiency, evidence accumulation, and neural mechanisms. The design crossed context (L1–L2, L2–L3, L1–L3) with trial type (switch vs. repetition) and switching direction (to dominant vs. non-dominant language). Results: Despite comparable behavioral performance, drift-diffusion modeling revealed distinct processing profiles across contexts, with the L1–L2 context showing the lowest comprehension efficiency due to slower evidence accumulation. In the L1–L3 context, comprehension-specific proactive control was indexed by a larger P300 and smaller N400 for L1-to-L3 switches. Notably, no reactive control (switch costs) was observed across any dual-language context. MVPA successfully classified contexts and switching directions, revealing distinct spatiotemporal neural patterns. Conclusions: Trilingual comprehension switching mechanisms differ from production. Reactive control is not essential, while proactive control is context-dependent, emerging only in the high-conflict L1–L3 context. This proactive strategy involves allocating more bottom-up attention to the weaker L3, which, unlike in production, enhances rather than hinders overall efficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Brain Sciences (2076-3425) is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Complementary Index |
Full Text 
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science Be the first to leave a comment!