In EDS ansehen

Substantive Justice in Regional Election Dispute Resolution: Analyzing the Constitutional Court's Approach and Challenges in Indonesia.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Substantive Justice in Regional Election Dispute Resolution: Analyzing the Constitutional Court's Approach and Challenges in Indonesia.
Autoren: Gasma, Misbahuddin, Hamid, Abdul, Irwansyah, Rahman, Ali
Quelle: Pakistan Journal of Life & Social Sciences; 2025, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p3880-3888, 9p
Schlagwörter: DISPUTE resolution, CONSTITUTIONAL courts, JUSTICE, RESEARCH personnel, ELECTIONS
Abstract: In the 2020 regional election period, the Constitutional Court tried to provide as much space as possible for justice seekers to file their cases. On this occasion, the Constitutional Court developed the concept of implementing substantive justice in its resolution. Purpose This research is intended to find an ideal election dispute resolution model. The method used in this research, which uses a normative approach, tries to trace and find out what is being debated in the concept applied by the Constitutional Court, including the researcher's criticism of its implementation. The study results indicate that applying substantial justice in resolving regional head elections disputes at the Constitutional Court is a solution to various things that hinder justice seekers from getting justice in the chaos of implementing regional head elections throughout Indonesia. However, it is necessary to review the initial examination mechanism for cases exceeding the percentage provisions stated in Article 158 of Law No. 10 of 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Pakistan Journal of Life & Social Sciences is the property of Elite Scientific Forum and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Datenbank: Complementary Index
Beschreibung
Abstract:In the 2020 regional election period, the Constitutional Court tried to provide as much space as possible for justice seekers to file their cases. On this occasion, the Constitutional Court developed the concept of implementing substantive justice in its resolution. Purpose This research is intended to find an ideal election dispute resolution model. The method used in this research, which uses a normative approach, tries to trace and find out what is being debated in the concept applied by the Constitutional Court, including the researcher's criticism of its implementation. The study results indicate that applying substantial justice in resolving regional head elections disputes at the Constitutional Court is a solution to various things that hinder justice seekers from getting justice in the chaos of implementing regional head elections throughout Indonesia. However, it is necessary to review the initial examination mechanism for cases exceeding the percentage provisions stated in Article 158 of Law No. 10 of 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:17274915
DOI:10.57239/PJLSS-2025-23.1.00306