In EDS ansehen

Early thinking palliative care for people with Parkinson's disease: A thematic synthesis based on a systematic mixed-methods review.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Early thinking palliative care for people with Parkinson's disease: A thematic synthesis based on a systematic mixed-methods review.
Autoren: Garon, Michela, Weck, Christiane, Leta, Valentina, Dijkstra, Bauke W, Muente, Catharina, Gentile, Giovanni, Trivedi, Dhaval, Groot, Marieke M, Lorenzl, Stefan, Odin, Per, Konitsiotis, Spyridon, Pedrosa, David J, Fotiadis, Dimitrios I, Meinders, Marjan J, Bloem, Bastiaan R, Schrag, Anette E, Grover, Laura, Taba, Pille, Ray Chaudhuri, K, Antonini, Angelo
Quelle: Journal of Parkinson's Disease; Jun2025, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p710-758, 49p
Schlagwörter: PARKINSON'S disease, PARKINSONIAN disorders, HEALTH services accessibility, MEDICAL personnel, CONSENSUS (Social sciences)
Abstract: Background: Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. Awareness and the evidence supporting the merits of palliative care (PC) approaches to people with Parkinson's disease (PwP) are increasing. Objective: This review aimed to address four key questions related to PC for PwPs and their caregivers: i) What are the indicators for timely access to PC? ii) When should PC be introduced? iii) What are the current care models for providing PC? iv) What are the barriers and facilitators at the organizational level? Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE (2006–2024). Six reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts, and thematic synthesis was applied to develop analytical themes. Reporting followed PRISMA guidelines. Results: Out of 894 studies, 70 were included. PwPs were infrequently referred to PC services, and while several referral criteria were identified, no consensus emerged. Barriers to accessing PC included insufficient information, inadequate education, difficulties determining referral timing, limited home-based care options, inconsistent provider support, and disparities linked to socioeconomic and cultural factors. Facilitators included improved care coordination and education for PwPs, caregivers, and healthcare providers. Effective PC models were identified, including home-based, hospital-based, and community-based approaches, which improved quality of life and reduced healthcare costs. Conclusions: Establishing consensus on referral timing and criteria is essential for integrating PC into Parkinson's disease care. Overcoming barriers requires enhanced education, better care coordination, and targeted interventions to address disparities, ensuring comprehensive, patient-centred care for PwPs and their caregivers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Parkinson's Disease is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Datenbank: Complementary Index
Beschreibung
Abstract:Background: Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. Awareness and the evidence supporting the merits of palliative care (PC) approaches to people with Parkinson's disease (PwP) are increasing. Objective: This review aimed to address four key questions related to PC for PwPs and their caregivers: i) What are the indicators for timely access to PC? ii) When should PC be introduced? iii) What are the current care models for providing PC? iv) What are the barriers and facilitators at the organizational level? Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE (2006–2024). Six reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts, and thematic synthesis was applied to develop analytical themes. Reporting followed PRISMA guidelines. Results: Out of 894 studies, 70 were included. PwPs were infrequently referred to PC services, and while several referral criteria were identified, no consensus emerged. Barriers to accessing PC included insufficient information, inadequate education, difficulties determining referral timing, limited home-based care options, inconsistent provider support, and disparities linked to socioeconomic and cultural factors. Facilitators included improved care coordination and education for PwPs, caregivers, and healthcare providers. Effective PC models were identified, including home-based, hospital-based, and community-based approaches, which improved quality of life and reduced healthcare costs. Conclusions: Establishing consensus on referral timing and criteria is essential for integrating PC into Parkinson's disease care. Overcoming barriers requires enhanced education, better care coordination, and targeted interventions to address disparities, ensuring comprehensive, patient-centred care for PwPs and their caregivers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:18777171
DOI:10.1177/1877718X251321110