Zobrazit v EDS

Effects of Sisal Saponins on Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Fermentation of Lignocellulosic Biomass.

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Effects of Sisal Saponins on Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Fermentation of Lignocellulosic Biomass.
Autoři: da Costa, Nogueira Cleitiane, dos Santos, Mariza Gabryella Brito, de Freitas, Francisco Bruno Ferreira, da Costa, Glória Louine Vital, de Oliveira, Gleyson Batista, Costa, Isabela Oliveira, de Santana Souza, Domingos Fabiano, dos Santos, Everaldo Silvino, de Araújo Padilha, Carlos Eduardo
Zdroj: BioEnergy Research; Dec2024, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p2200-2212, 13p
Témata: CELLULOSIC ethanol, LIGNOCELLULOSE, GLYCOSIDES, SACCHAROMYCES cerevisiae, BIOCHEMICAL substrates, SAPONINS
Abstrakt: Saponins are surface-active glycosides successfully applied to produce sugars via enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation. However, there are several reports that saponins compromise the integrity of yeast cells, which would limit ethanol titers. In this context, the present study evaluated the role of saponins from sisal (Agave sisalana) on the action of cellulases and yeast within the context of cellulosic ethanol. Microcrystalline cellulose, pretreated coconut fiber samples, and pretreated corncob samples were evaluated as cellulose sources. Sisal saponins increased cellulolytic activity in adsorption (from 20.9 to 46.4%) and enzymatic hydrolysis (33.5 to 63.0%, using alkaline-pretreated coconut fiber as substrate). However, the amount of released sugars remained unchanged in tests with pretreated biomasses. Glucose released in the hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose reduced from 22.03 to 19.09 g/L using 10% (w/w) saponins. One percent (w/w) saponins caused an abrupt decrease in the viability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells within a few minutes (from 98.07 to 29.57% in 240 min), and ethanol was not produced in the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. For this reason, sisal saponins have not replicated the success of other types of saponins and are unsuitable for cellulosic ethanol production. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of BioEnergy Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Databáze: Complementary Index
Popis
Abstrakt:Saponins are surface-active glycosides successfully applied to produce sugars via enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation. However, there are several reports that saponins compromise the integrity of yeast cells, which would limit ethanol titers. In this context, the present study evaluated the role of saponins from sisal (Agave sisalana) on the action of cellulases and yeast within the context of cellulosic ethanol. Microcrystalline cellulose, pretreated coconut fiber samples, and pretreated corncob samples were evaluated as cellulose sources. Sisal saponins increased cellulolytic activity in adsorption (from 20.9 to 46.4%) and enzymatic hydrolysis (33.5 to 63.0%, using alkaline-pretreated coconut fiber as substrate). However, the amount of released sugars remained unchanged in tests with pretreated biomasses. Glucose released in the hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose reduced from 22.03 to 19.09 g/L using 10% (w/w) saponins. One percent (w/w) saponins caused an abrupt decrease in the viability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells within a few minutes (from 98.07 to 29.57% in 240 min), and ethanol was not produced in the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. For this reason, sisal saponins have not replicated the success of other types of saponins and are unsuitable for cellulosic ethanol production. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:19391234
DOI:10.1007/s12155-024-10798-5