View in EDS

Efficacy and Safety of Corticosteroid in Combination with 5-Fluorouracil in the Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Efficacy and Safety of Corticosteroid in Combination with 5-Fluorouracil in the Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Authors: Shi, Jianzhen, Zhang, Siqi, Xu, Jianru, Chen, Yanmei, Sun, Siyu
Source: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery; Oct2024, Vol. 48 Issue 19, p3765-3778, 14p
Abstract: Background: Addressing hypertrophic scars and keloids poses a significant challenge in the realm of preventive and curative medicine. Combination corticosteroid with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is presumed to enhance the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids, although supportive evidence is lacking. This study is aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety profile of a combined corticosteroid and 5-FU regimen in treating hypertrophic scars and keloids. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted for pertinent studies across various databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Medline. The calculation of weighted mean difference (WMD), risk ratios (RR), odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was executed. Additionally, the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool was utilized to evaluate potential bias risks. Results: A total of 15 studies were involved. The effectiveness based on patient self-assessment and the effectiveness based on observer assessment were significantly higher in the corticosteroid+5-FU group compared to those treated with control. A meta-analysis of scar height showed that the corticosteroid+5-FU group performed better than the control group (WMD = −0.38, 95% CI −0.58 to −0.18). There was no significant difference between the corticosteroid+5-FU group and the control group in improving scar vascularity, pliability and pigmentation. The result revealed that the corticosteroid+5-FU group of patients had less adverse effect of hypopigmentation, skin atrophy and telangiectasia than the control group. Conclusion: The combined use of corticosteroids and 5-FU appears to be a more effective strategy for the treatment and prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids, as evidenced by greater improvements in scar height and overall effectiveness, coupled with a reduced incidence of side effects. Level of Evidence II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
Description
Abstract:Background: Addressing hypertrophic scars and keloids poses a significant challenge in the realm of preventive and curative medicine. Combination corticosteroid with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is presumed to enhance the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids, although supportive evidence is lacking. This study is aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety profile of a combined corticosteroid and 5-FU regimen in treating hypertrophic scars and keloids. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted for pertinent studies across various databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Medline. The calculation of weighted mean difference (WMD), risk ratios (RR), odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was executed. Additionally, the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool was utilized to evaluate potential bias risks. Results: A total of 15 studies were involved. The effectiveness based on patient self-assessment and the effectiveness based on observer assessment were significantly higher in the corticosteroid+5-FU group compared to those treated with control. A meta-analysis of scar height showed that the corticosteroid+5-FU group performed better than the control group (WMD = −0.38, 95% CI −0.58 to −0.18). There was no significant difference between the corticosteroid+5-FU group and the control group in improving scar vascularity, pliability and pigmentation. The result revealed that the corticosteroid+5-FU group of patients had less adverse effect of hypopigmentation, skin atrophy and telangiectasia than the control group. Conclusion: The combined use of corticosteroids and 5-FU appears to be a more effective strategy for the treatment and prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids, as evidenced by greater improvements in scar height and overall effectiveness, coupled with a reduced incidence of side effects. Level of Evidence II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:0364216X
DOI:10.1007/s00266-024-04237-1