Zobrazit v EDS

Unresectability during open surgical exploration in planned cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy*.

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Unresectability during open surgical exploration in planned cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy*.
Autoři: Yong, Zachary Zihui, Tan, Grace Hwei Ching, Wong, Joelle Fui Sze, Lim, Cindy, Soo, Khee Chee, Teo, Melissa Ching Ching
Zdroj: International Journal of Hyperthermia; Dec2016, Vol. 32 Issue 8, p889-894, 6p
Témata: CYTOREDUCTIVE surgery, ONCOLOGIC surgery, TUMOR surgery, CANCER chemotherapy, CANCER treatment
Abstrakt: Background:Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy are the treatment of choice for selected patients with peritoneal metastasis. Despite a stringent selection process, some patients were found to be unresectable only at surgery, which leads to disappointment and poor utilisation of limited infrastructural resources. This study aims to determine the pre-operative factors associated with unresectability in planned CRS and HIPEC. Methods:Retrospective analysis of 172 consecutive patients eligible for CRS and HIPEC at the National Cancer Centre Singapore from April 2004 to May 2014 was performed. Pre-operative factors (clinical presentation, disease factors, and investigation findings) between the unresectable (13%) and the successful groups (87%) were compared. Results:Patient demographics between the two cohorts were comparable. In terms of clinical presentation, the unresectable group was more likely to present with bloating (p = .00), altered bowel habits (p = .04), abdominal distension (p = .00), palpable abdominal masses (p = .00) and palpable pouch of Douglas nodules (p = .00). Differences were also noted in disease factors with the unresectable group having more high-grade tumours (p = .01), inadequate initial resections (p = .01), progression through chemotherapy (p = .00) and shorter median disease-free intervals (p = .03). In addition, investigations in the unresectable group revealed more patients with elevated tumour markers (p = .01), thrombocytosis (p = .00) and computed tomography findings of ascites (p = .00), omental thickening (p = .00), lymphadenopathy (p = .02) and small bowel disease (p = .00). Conclusions:Significant factors associated with unresectability that were identified in our study could potentially create a new treatment algorithm and refine current selection process to exclude patients at risk of unresectability in planned CRS and HIPEC. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
Copyright of International Journal of Hyperthermia is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Databáze: Complementary Index
Popis
Abstrakt:Background:Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy are the treatment of choice for selected patients with peritoneal metastasis. Despite a stringent selection process, some patients were found to be unresectable only at surgery, which leads to disappointment and poor utilisation of limited infrastructural resources. This study aims to determine the pre-operative factors associated with unresectability in planned CRS and HIPEC. Methods:Retrospective analysis of 172 consecutive patients eligible for CRS and HIPEC at the National Cancer Centre Singapore from April 2004 to May 2014 was performed. Pre-operative factors (clinical presentation, disease factors, and investigation findings) between the unresectable (13%) and the successful groups (87%) were compared. Results:Patient demographics between the two cohorts were comparable. In terms of clinical presentation, the unresectable group was more likely to present with bloating (p = .00), altered bowel habits (p = .04), abdominal distension (p = .00), palpable abdominal masses (p = .00) and palpable pouch of Douglas nodules (p = .00). Differences were also noted in disease factors with the unresectable group having more high-grade tumours (p = .01), inadequate initial resections (p = .01), progression through chemotherapy (p = .00) and shorter median disease-free intervals (p = .03). In addition, investigations in the unresectable group revealed more patients with elevated tumour markers (p = .01), thrombocytosis (p = .00) and computed tomography findings of ascites (p = .00), omental thickening (p = .00), lymphadenopathy (p = .02) and small bowel disease (p = .00). Conclusions:Significant factors associated with unresectability that were identified in our study could potentially create a new treatment algorithm and refine current selection process to exclude patients at risk of unresectability in planned CRS and HIPEC. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
ISSN:02656736
DOI:10.1080/02656736.2016.1221146