Infrastructure for Humans, Nesting for Birds: Snow Poles as Unintended Avian Habitats in Hokkaido, Japan.
Gespeichert in:
| Titel: | Infrastructure for Humans, Nesting for Birds: Snow Poles as Unintended Avian Habitats in Hokkaido, Japan. |
|---|---|
| Autoren: | Mikami OK; Hokkaido University of Education, Hakodate, Japan. osamu.k.mikami@gmail.com., Mikami K; Japan Bird Research Association, Tokyo, Japan., Morimoto G; Yamashina Institute for Ornithology, Abiko, Japan., Ueno Y; Ishikawa Prefectural University, Nonoichi, Japan. |
| Quelle: | Environmental management [Environ Manage] 2025 Dec 01; Vol. 76 (1), pp. 21. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Dec 01. |
| Publikationsart: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | English |
| Info zur Zeitschrift: | Publisher: Springer Verlag Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 7703893 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1432-1009 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0364152X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Environ Manage Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Publication: New York Ny : Springer Verlag Original Publication: New York, Springer-Verlag. |
| MeSH-Schlagworte: | Nesting Behavior* , Sparrows*/physiology , Ecosystem*, Animals ; Japan ; Humans ; Birds ; Snow ; Population Dynamics ; Conservation of Natural Resources |
| Abstract: | Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Structures made by humans are shaped by regional culture, history, climate, and social needs. Although such structures are not designed for wildlife, birds often use them as nesting sites, suggesting that human infrastructure can unintentionally influence avian behaviour and population dynamics. This study examined a striking example of this in Arrow poles widely installed in Hokkaido, Japan. Developed as a winter road-safety feature in the 1980s, Arrow poles consist of a hollow horizontal aluminium pipe that is often left open-ended, creating cavities for bird nesting. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic assessment of these structures as avian nesting sites. Focusing on Eurasian Tree Sparrows (Passer montanus) and Russet Sparrows (Passer rutilans), we used Google Street View (February 2024) and field surveys (June 2023) to estimate Arrow pole numbers, nest occupancy rates, and total nest numbers. Of the approximately 281,560 poles estimated across Hokkaido, 5.0% may be occupied by Eurasian Tree Sparrows and 7.67% by Russet Sparrows, corresponding to 2.52% and 8.80% of the total nest numbers for each species, respectively. These estimates were derived from Monte Carlo simulations to incorporate uncertainty. Further analysis using long-term bird monitoring data (1997-2002 and 2016-2020) and statistical comparisons (Mann-Whitney U test and linear regression) suggested that Russet Sparrow populations have increased more in Hokkaido than in mainland Japan, particularly along roads with Arrow poles. These findings highlight how infrastructure developed for human use can unintentionally support wildlife and highlight the potential for integrating biodiversity considerations into infrastructure planning. (© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.) |
| References: | Anguelov D, Dulong C, Filip D, Frueh C, Lafon S, Lyon R, Ogale A, Vincent L, Weaver J (2010) Google Street View: capturing the world at street level. Computer 43(6):32–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2010.170 . (PMID: 10.1109/MC.2010.170) Balen JHV, Booy CJH, Van Franeker JA, Osieck ER (1982) Studies on hole-nesting birds in natural nest sites. Ardea 55:1–24. https://doi.org/10.5253/arde.v70.p1 . (PMID: 10.5253/arde.v70.p1) Battin J (2004) When good animals love bad habitats: ecological traps and the conservation of animal populations. Conserv Biol 18(6):1482–1491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00417.x . (PMID: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00417.x) Bekker H, Iuell B (2003) Habitat fragmentation due to infrastructure. eScholarship University of California. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9693w540. Benítez-López A, Alkemade R, Verweij PA (2010) The impacts of roads and other infrastructure on mammal and bird populations: a meta-analysis. Biol Conserv 143(6):1307–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.02.009 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.02.009) Brawn JD, Balda RP (1988) Population biology of cavity nesters in Northern Arizona: do nest sites limit breeding densities?. Condor 90(1):61–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368434 . (PMID: 10.2307/1368434) Burdett EM, Muriel R, Morandini V, Kolnegari M, Ferrer M (2022) Power lines and birds: drivers of conflict-prone use of pylons by nesting white storks (Ciconia ciconia). Diversity 14(11):984. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14110984 . (PMID: 10.3390/d14110984) Dixon A, Purev-Ochir G, Galtbalt B, Batbayar N (2013) The use of power lines by breeding raptors and corvids in Mongolia: nest-site characteristics and management using artificial nests. J Raptor Res 47(3):282–291. https://doi.org/10.3356/JRR-12-00020.1 . (PMID: 10.3356/JRR-12-00020.1) Drewitt E (2014) Urban peregrines. Pelagic Publishing, Exeter, UK. Eklund A, Trimble J (2021) beeswarm: the Bee Swarm Plot, an Alternative to stripchart. R package version 0.4.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=beeswarm . Franco AMA, Marques JT, Sutherland WJ (2005) Is nest-site availability limiting Lesser Kestrel populations? A multiple scale approach. Ibis 147(4):657–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2005.00437.x . (PMID: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2005.00437.x) Giovanni MD, Van Der Burg MP, Anderson LC, Powell LA, Schacht WH, Tyre AJ (2011) Estimating nest density when detectability is incomplete: variation in nest attendance and response to disturbance by Western Meadowlarks. Condor 113(1):223–232. https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2011.100076 . (PMID: 10.1525/cond.2011.100076) Hale R, Swearer SE (2016) Ecological traps: current evidence and future directions. Proc Biol Sci 283(1824):20152647. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2647 . (PMID: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2647) Hewlett B, Elderkin S, King R (2024) Nature-positive infrastructure—habitat connectivity structures, a call to arms. Proc Inst Civ Eng Civ Eng 177(6):89–98. https://doi.org/10.1680/jcien.24.00930 . (PMID: 10.1680/jcien.24.00930) Hokkaido Regional Development Bureau, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (2024) Road design guidelines Fiscal year, 2024 edn. (in Japanese). https://www.hkd.mlit.go.jp/ky/kn/dou_ken/ud49g70000001jbe.html . Accessed February 2024. Inatsu M, Kawazoe S, Mori M (2021) Trends and projection of heavy snowfall in Hokkaido, Japan as an application of self-organizing map. J Appl Meteorol Climatol. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-21-0085.1. James Reynolds SJ, Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Sumasgutner P, Mainwaring MC (2019) Urbanisation and nest building in birds: a review of threats and opportunities. J Ornithol 160(3):841–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-019-01657-8 . (PMID: 10.1007/s10336-019-01657-8) Kainady PG (1982) Incidence of the House Sparrow nesting on metal poles in semi-arid region of South Iraq. Bol Basrah Nat Hist Mus 5(1):65–83. Lambrechts MM, Adriaensen F, Ardia DR et al. (2010) The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: a review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases. Acta Ornithol 45(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.3161/000164510X516047 . (PMID: 10.3161/000164510X516047) Lesiński G (2000) Location of bird nests in vertical metal pipes in suburban built-up area of Warsaw. Acta Ornithol 35(2):211–214. https://doi.org/10.3161/068.035.0203 . (PMID: 10.3161/068.035.0203) Li X, Zhang C, Li W, Ricard R, Meng Q, Zhang W (2015) Assessing street-level urban greenery using Google Street View and a modified green view index. Urban Urban Green 14(3):675–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.006 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.006) Liu X-R, Li Z-Q (2024) Urban bird nest building on man-made structures: a review. Zool Res Divers Conserv 1(4):273–281. https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2097-3772.2024.009 . (PMID: 10.24272/j.issn.2097-3772.2024.009) Mainwaring MC (2015) The use of man-made structures as nesting sites by birds: a review of the costs and benefits. J Nat Conserv 25:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2015.02.007 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jnc.2015.02.007) Mikami OK (2008) How many tree sparrows Passer montanus are there in Japan?. Bird Res 4:A19–A29. https://doi.org/10.11211/birdresearch.4.A19 . (PMID: 10.11211/birdresearch.4.A19) Mikami OK (2019) Nesting on man-made structures by birds in Japan: cases and perspectives. Jpn J Ornithol 68(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.3838/jjo.68.1 . (PMID: 10.3838/jjo.68.1) Mikami OK, Kiyohara K, Mogi K (2024) Effects of artificial and natural substrates on breeding birds in a Japanese city. Ornithol Sci 23(1):27–33. https://doi.org/10.2326/osj.23.27 . (PMID: 10.2326/osj.23.27) Mikami OK, Sugawara T, Matsui S, Kato T, Morimoto G, Kasahara S, Ueda K (2014) Nesting of the Eurasian Tree Sparrow on utility poles. Jpn J Ornithol 63(1):3–13. https://doi.org/10.3838/jjo.63.3 . (PMID: 10.3838/jjo.63.3) Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) (2022) Road statistics annual report 2022. https://www.mlit.go.jp/road/ir/ir-data/tokei-nen/2022tokei-nen.html . Accessed February 2024. Moreira F, Martins RC, Catry I, D’Amico M (2018) Drivers of power line use by white storks: a case study of birds nesting on anthropogenic structures. J Appl Ecol 55(5):2263–2273. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13149 . (PMID: 10.1111/1365-2664.13149) Morelli F, Beim M, Jerzak L, Jones D, Tryjanowski P (2014) Can roads, railways and related structures have positive effects on birds?— A review. Transp Res D 30:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.006 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.006) Negro JJ, Prenda J, Ferrero JJ, Rodríguez A, Reig-Ferrer A (2020) A timeline for the urbanization of wild birds: the case of the lesser kestrel. Quat Sci Rev 249:106638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106638 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106638) Newton I (1994) The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: a review. Biol Conserv 70(3):265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(94)90172-4 . (PMID: 10.1016/0006-3207(94)90172-4) Oyama H, Saito M, Mikami K, Mikami OK (2020) Bird’s nesting in traffic snow poles in Hokkaido, Japan. Jpn J Ornithol 69(2):235–239. https://doi.org/10.3838/jjo.69.235 . (PMID: 10.3838/jjo.69.235) R Core Team (2023) *R: A language and environment for statistical computing*. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/. Richards DR, Edwards PJ (2017) Quantifying street tree regulating ecosystem services using Google Street View. Ecol Indic 77:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.028 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.028) Riley SPD, Brown JL, Sikich JA, Schoonmaker CM, Boydston EE (2014) Wildlife friendly roads: the impacts of roads on wildlife in urban areas and potential remedies. In: McCleery RA, Moorman CE, Peterson MN (eds) Urban wildlife, Theory and practice. Springer, New York, p 323–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7500-3_15 . Schlaepfer MA, Runge MC, Sherman PW (2002) Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol Evol 17(10):474–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02580-6 . (PMID: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02580-6) Seiler A, Bhardwaj M (2020) Wildlife and traffic: an inevitable but not unsolvable problem? In: Angelici FM, Rossi L (eds) Problematic wildlife II. Springer International Publishing, Cham, p 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42335-3_6. Smith PA, Bart J, Lanctot RB, McCaffery BJ, Brown S (2009) Probability of detection of nests and implications for survey design. Condor 111(3):414–423. https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2009.090002 . (PMID: 10.1525/cond.2009.090002) Summers-Smith JD (1995) The tree sparrow. JD Summers-Smith, Billingham, UK. Takechi H, Ito Y, Matsuzawa M, Kajiya Y (2006) Recognition of fixed-post delineators with arrow-shaped pointers under poor visibility conditions in blowing-snow. Mon rep Civ Eng Res Inst cold reg 636:12–22. Taylor BD, Goldingay RL (2010) Roads and wildlife: impacts, mitigation and implications for wildlife management in Australia. Wildl Res 37(4):320–331. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR09171 . (PMID: 10.1071/WR09171) Torres A, Jaeger JAG, Alonso JC (2016) Assessing large-scale wildlife responses to human infrastructure development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(30):8472–8477. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522488113 . (PMID: 10.1073/pnas.1522488113) Ueta M, Uemura S (2021) Report of the breeding bird atlas of Japan: mapping the present status of Japan’s birds 2016–2021. TJBBA Group. Underhill JE, Angold PG (2000) Effects of roads on wildlife in an intensively modified landscape. Environ Rev 8(1):21–39. https://doi.org/10.1139/a00-003 . (PMID: 10.1139/a00-003) Wiebe KL (2011) Nest sites as limiting resources for cavity-nesting birds in mature forest ecosystems: a review of the evidence. J Field Ornithol 82(3):239–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1557-9263.2011.00327.x . (PMID: 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2011.00327.x) Yuta T, Koizumi I (2012) Long breeding season and high frequency of multiple brooding in great tits in northern Japan. Ardea 100(2):197–201. https://doi.org/10.5253/078.100.0211 . (PMID: 10.5253/078.100.0211) Yuta T, Nomi D (2019) Breeding biology of the Eurasian nuthatch Sitta europaea in northern Japan. J Yamashina Inst Ornithol 51(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.3312/jyio.51.197 . (PMID: 10.3312/jyio.51.197) |
| Grant Information: | JP24K08963 JSPS KAKENHI; JP24K08963 JSPS KAKENHI; JP24K08963 JSPS KAKENHI |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: Anthropocene ecology; Artificial structures; Cavity-nesting birds; Human–wildlife interactions; Urban–rural gradient |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20251201 Date Completed: 20251202 Latest Revision: 20251201 |
| Update Code: | 20251202 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00267-025-02316-w |
| PMID: | 41326800 |
| Datenbank: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstract: | Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.<br />Structures made by humans are shaped by regional culture, history, climate, and social needs. Although such structures are not designed for wildlife, birds often use them as nesting sites, suggesting that human infrastructure can unintentionally influence avian behaviour and population dynamics. This study examined a striking example of this in Arrow poles widely installed in Hokkaido, Japan. Developed as a winter road-safety feature in the 1980s, Arrow poles consist of a hollow horizontal aluminium pipe that is often left open-ended, creating cavities for bird nesting. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic assessment of these structures as avian nesting sites. Focusing on Eurasian Tree Sparrows (Passer montanus) and Russet Sparrows (Passer rutilans), we used Google Street View (February 2024) and field surveys (June 2023) to estimate Arrow pole numbers, nest occupancy rates, and total nest numbers. Of the approximately 281,560 poles estimated across Hokkaido, 5.0% may be occupied by Eurasian Tree Sparrows and 7.67% by Russet Sparrows, corresponding to 2.52% and 8.80% of the total nest numbers for each species, respectively. These estimates were derived from Monte Carlo simulations to incorporate uncertainty. Further analysis using long-term bird monitoring data (1997-2002 and 2016-2020) and statistical comparisons (Mann-Whitney U test and linear regression) suggested that Russet Sparrow populations have increased more in Hokkaido than in mainland Japan, particularly along roads with Arrow poles. These findings highlight how infrastructure developed for human use can unintentionally support wildlife and highlight the potential for integrating biodiversity considerations into infrastructure planning.<br /> (© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.) |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1432-1009 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00267-025-02316-w |