Výsledky vyhľadávania - applications program interfaces in agile distributed (projects OR projekt)
-
1
Autori:
Zdroj: Mathematics, Vol 7, Iss 10, p 963 (2019)
Predmety: distributed development, agile development, application program interfaces in agile distributed projects, framework for agile distributed development, Mathematics, QA1-939
Relation: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/7/10/963; https://doaj.org/toc/2227-7390; https://doaj.org/article/c65dafc5754d459283f86d0198002489
-
2
Autori:
Predmety: advertisement, multidimensional scaling, price discounts, patient's queue, full trade credit, Trade-credit financing, robustness, backordering, four-dimensional transportation problem, learning behavior, CLSC management, inspection, green data envelopment analysis (GDEA), distribution-free approach, inventory modelling and optimization, revenue sharing, Cash discounts, electric power distribution, simulation, deteriorating items, targeting model, offline inspection, distributed development, transport infrastructure, recurrent states, mixed integer nonlinear programming, uncertain information, carbon emission, framework for agile distributed development, data envelopment analysis, TA1-2040, defective rate, decision support systems, optimized limits, energy, repairable system, strict quasi-concavity, information asymmetry, smart production, transshipments, stochastic-petri net modeling, economic order quantity (EOQ), O2O channel, thema EDItEUR::T Technology, Engineering, Agriculture, Industrial processes::TB Technology: general issues::TBX History of engineering and technology, e-commerce, multi-stage production system, complementary products, application program interfaces in agile distributed projects, workers' efficiency, preservation technology investment, radio frequency identification, substitutable products, process imperfection, permissible delays in payments, Bayesian approach, efficiency and scatter plots, defectives, system reliability, defective products, budget constraint, process mean, production, customer acquisition cost, inspection errors, imperfect products, pricing policy, disruption risks, resilient supply chain, sustainable healthcare system, business performance, develop strategies, multicriteria decision making (MCDM), pricing, staff absenteeism, supplier selection, benchmarking, scheduling, imperfect manufacturing system, mathematical solution procedure, Supply chain management, managerial considerations and managerial decisions, airborne particulate matter, petrochemical industries, hybrid manufacturing- remanufacturing strategy, supply chain management, evolutionary algorithm, agile development, decomposition principle, supply chain inventory, controllable probabilistic deterioration rate, likelihood ratio test, rework, sustainability, air quality, optimal algorithms, random defective rate, mathematical analytic tools and techniques, stochastic-price dependent demand, fuzzy optimization, backorder, human-based production system, inventory control, optimization, variable demand, machine breakdown, fixed charge, workplace stress, partial trade credit, substitute and complimentary items, integer linear programming, waste reduction, triangular fuzzy number, multi-objective, production modelling, change point detection, Lean manufacturing, T1-995, lead-time reduction, inspection cost, quality control, industry 4.0, supplier selection process, refrigerated trucks, deterioration, reworking, fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP), reliability threshold, outgoing quality, space constraint, newsvendor, imperfect production, dynamic job-shop scheduling, order allocation, rough interval, internet of things, imperfect quality, inventory, fuzzy demand, time series analysis, edible oil, preventive maintenance, sustainable, imperfect repair, lean manufacturing, technical and super-efficiencies
Popis súboru: application/octet-stream
-
3
Autori: a ďalší
Zdroj: Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2025, p1-11. 11p.
Plný text vo formáte HTML Plný text ve formátu PDF -
4
Autori:
Zdroj: Mathematics (2227-7390); Oct2019, Vol. 7 Issue 10, p963-963, 1p
-
5
Autori: a ďalší
Typ zdroja: eBook.
Predmet: Sustainable development--Technological innovations, Artificial intelligence--Environmental aspects, Computational intelligence
Kategórie: COMPUTERS / Artificial Intelligence / General, BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Development / Sustainable Development, COMPUTERS / Distributed Systems / General, COMPUTERS / Software Development & Engineering / Systems Analysis & Design, COMPUTERS / Software Development & Engineering / Quality Assurance & Testing, COMPUTERS / Software Development & Engineering / Project Management, COMPUTERS / Software Development & Engineering / Tools, COMPUTERS / Internet / Application Development, COMPUTERS / Business & Productivity Software / Collaboration, COMPUTERS / Data Science / Machine Learning
Plný text ve formátu PDF Plný text vo formáte ePub -
6
Autori:
Zdroj: Ship science & technology (Cartagena); Vol. 19 No. 37 (2025); 75-108 ; 2619-645X ; 1909-8642
Predmety: artificial intelligence (AI), naval project management, project efficiency, adaptive structuration theory (AST)
Popis súboru: application/pdf; text/html
Relation: https://shipjournal.co/index.php/sst/article/view/276/695; https://shipjournal.co/index.php/sst/article/view/276/700; M. W. SHENHAR, A. J. SHENHAR, Reinventing Project Management: The Diamond Approach to Successful Growth and Innovation, Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 2017.; Y. K. DWIVEDI, et al., "So what if ChatGPT wrote it?" Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy, International Journal of Information Management, vol. 71, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642; P. ZHENG, One-of-a-Kind Product Development for Mass Personalisation in a Cloud-Based Environment. ResearchSpace@Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 2017.; M. L. TSAI, et al., Exploring the use of large language models (LLMs) in chemical engineering education: Building core course problem models with Chat-GPT, Education for Chemical Engineers, vol. 44, pp. 71-95, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2023.05.001; K. JANGJARAT, et al., Public perceptions towards ChatGPT as the Robo-assistant, Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, vol. 13, no. 3, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13366; F. VINCHON, et al., Artificial intelligence & creativity: a Manifesto for collaboration, Journal ofCreative Behavior, 2023.[Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.597; M. M. RAHMAN, Y. WATANOBE, ChatGPT for education and research: opportunities, threats, and strategies, Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 9, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783; A. JANMETHAKULWAT, B. THANASOPON, Digital technology adoption and institutionalization in Thai maritime industry: An exploratory study of the Thai shipowners, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, vol. 40, pp. 157-166, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2024.08.001; M. S. POOLE, G. DESANCTIS, "Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration," in Organizations and Communication Technology, SAGE Publications, Inc, Newbury Park, CA, USA, pp. 173-193, 1990. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483325385.n8; B. JOINER, S. JOSEPHS, Developing agile leaders, Industrial and Commercial Training, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 35-42, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197850710721381; S. CHO, J. M. LEE, J. H. WOO, Development of production planning system for shipbuilding using component-based development framework, International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, vol. 13, pp. 405-430, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2021.05.001; A. M. GESKE, D. M. HEROLD, S. KUMMER, Integrating AI support into a framework for collaborative decision-making (CDM) for airline disruption management, Journal of the Air Transport Research Society, vol. 3, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jatrs.2024.100026; J. DEVLIN et al., "BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding," 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, pp. 4171-4186, Jun. 2018.; A. RADFORD et al., "Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pretraining," 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.mikecapt.com/resources/pdf/GPT-1.pdf; X.H. WANG et al., "An ontology based approach to organize multi-agent assisted supply chain negotiations", Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol 65, no. 1, pp. 2-15, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.06.018; M. LWAKATARE et al., "A Taxonomy of Software Engineering Challenges for Machine Learning Systems: An Empirical Investigation," Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW), Jeju Island, South Korea, pp. 252255, Sep. 2019.; S. Krakowski, J. Luger, and S. Raisch, "Artificial Intelligence and the Changing Sources of Competitive Advantage," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1425-1452, Jun. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3387; M. .MARTINSUO, T. AHOLA, "Multi-project management in inter-organizational contexts," International Journal of Project Management, vol. 40, pp. 813-826, Oct. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.09.003; J. FOIDL, M. FELDERER, "Risk-based data validation in machine learning-based software systems," in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Machine Learning Techniques for Software Quality Evaluation, pp. 13-18, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340482.3342743; A. GAWER and M. A. CUSUMANO, "Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation," Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 417-433, Mar. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12105; Y. ZHONG, S. GOODFELLOW, "Domainspecific language models pre-trained on construction management systems corpora", Automation in Construction, vol. 160, Oct. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105316; J. N. D. GUPTA, et al., "Heuristics for hybrid flow shops with controllable processing times and assignable due dates", Computers & Operations Research, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1417-1439, Oct. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(01)00040-5; X. Xiao, et al., "HMM-TCN-based health assessment and state prediction for robot mechanical axis", International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22621; S. FOIDL and M. FELDERER, "Risk-based data validation in machine learning-based software systems," in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Machine Learning Techniques for Software Quality Evaluation, 2019, pp. 1318. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340482.3342743; J. DALZOCHIO, et al., "Machine learning and reasoning for predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0: Current status and challenges", Computers in Industry, vol. 123, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103298; A. LABRINIDIS and H. V. JAGADISH, "Challenges and opportunities with big data," Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 2032-2033, Aug. 2012. https://doi.org/10.14778/2367502.2367572; G. VAN ROSSUM and F. L. DRAKE, Jr., Python tutorial, Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995.; M. HONNIBAL and I. MONTANI, "spaCy 2: Natural language understanding with Bloom embeddings, convolutional neural networks and incremental parsing," To Appear, 2017.; T. AKIBA, S. SANO, T. YANASE, T. OHTA, and M. KOYAMA, "Optuna: A nextgeneration hyperparameter optimization framework," in Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, Anchorage, AK, USA, Aug. 2019, pp. 26232631. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330701; J. G. ROHWER, S. KÜHL, and N. KÜHL, "PyTorch Forecasting: Time serie forecasting with PyTorch," 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.00090; W. WU, C. WEN, Q. YUAN, Q. CHEN, and Y. CAO, "Construction and application of knowledge graph for construction accidents based on deep learning," Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2023-0; WES MCKINNEY. Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, 2010, pp. 51-56. https://doi.org/10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a; S. VAN DER WALT, S. C. COLBERT, and G. VAROQUAUX, "The NumPy array: A structure for efficient numerical computation," Computing in Science & Engineering, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 22-30, Mar. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.37; J. D. HUNTER, "Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment," Computing in Science & Engineering, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 90-95, May 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55; The PostgreSQL Global Development Group, PostgreSQL 15.4 Documentation, The PostgreSQL Global Development Group, 2024.; CHODOROW, K., & DIROLF, M. (2010). MongoDB: the definitive guide. O'Reilly Media, Inc.; J. KREPS, N. NARKHEDE, J. RAO, and G. TAYLOR, "Kafka: A distributed messaging system for log processing," in Proceedings of the NetDB Workshop, 2011, pp. 1-7.; D. MERKEL, Docker: Lightweight Linux Containers for Consistent Development and Deployment, Linux Journal, Houston, TX, USA, 2014.; Kubernetes, Kubernetes Documentation, Kubernetes, 2024.; Pressman, R. S. (2010). Software engineering: a practitioner's approach (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.; P. S. K. KRISHNAMURTHY, Software Testing and Continuous Quality Improvement, 2nd ed., Wiley, 2012.; T. D. COOK, D. T. CAMPBELL, QuasiExperimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, USA, 1979.; J. W. CRESWELL, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th ed. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2014.; Prometheus. Prometheus Authors. Retrieved from https://prometheus.io/; Grafana. Grafana Labs. Retrieved from https://grafana.com/; SAURO, J., & LEWIS, J. R. (2016). Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802308-2.00002-3; Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-052029-2.50009-7; A. P. C. CHAN, D. W. M. CHAN, and J. F. Y. YEUNG, "Overview of project risk management methodologies", J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 138, no. 6, pp. 728-737, Jun. 2012, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000442. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000442; M. MARTINSUO, T. AHOLA, "Multi-project management in inter-organizational contexts," International Journal of Project Management, vol. 40, pp. 813-826, Oct. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.09.003; W. J. ORLIKOWSKI, "Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 404-428, Aug. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600; A. M. FELICETTI et al., "Artificial intelligence and project management: An empirical investigation on the appropriation of generative Chatbots by project managers," Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 9, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100545; V. Venkatesh et al., "User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view," MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425-478. Sep. 2003. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540; R. DUBEY, et al., "Big data and predictive analytics and manufacturing performance: Integrating institutional theory, resourcebased view and big data culture," British Journal of Management, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 341-361, Jun. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12355; VENKATESH, V., MORRIS, M. G., DAVIS, G. B., & DAVIS, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540; FORSYTH, D. R. (2018). Group dynamics (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.; ROBBINS, S. P., & JUDGE, T. A. (2018). Essentials of organizational behavior (14th ed.). Pearson.; GOODHUE, D. L., & THOMPSON, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS quarterly, 213-236. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689; LEWIN, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human relations, 1(1), 5-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103; KOTTER, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard business review, 73(2), 59-67.; P. LOVE, Z. IRANI, and D. EDWARDS, "A seamless supply chain management model for construction," Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 43-56, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540410517575; S. CHO, J. M. LEE, and J. H. WOO, "Development of production planning system for shipbuilding using componentbased development framework," International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, vol. 13, pp. 405430, 2021.; Y. K. DWIVEDI, et al., ""So what if ChatGPT wrote it?" Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy," International Journal of Information Management, vol. 71, p. 102642, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642; B. KITCHENHAM, O. PEARL BRERETON, D. BUDGEN, M. TURNER, J. BAILEY, and S. LINKMAN, "Systematic literature reviews in software engineering-a systematic literature review," Information and software technology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 7-22, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009; SSI, "ShipConstructor," SSI, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ssi-corporate.com/products/shipconstructor/; Cadmatic, "CADMATIC Marine Design," Cadmatic, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.cadmatic.com/products/marine-design/; SENER, "FORAN," SENER, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.marine.sener/foran; Oracle, "Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management," Oracle, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.oracle.com/co/primavera/products/primavera-p6-enterprise-project-portfolio-management/; Microsoft, "Microsoft Project," Microsoft, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.microsoft.com/es-co/microsoft-365/project/project-management-software; A. J. SHENHAR and D. DVIR, "Project management evolution: past history and future research directions," in Proceedings of PMI Research Conference, 2004, pp. 1-7.; T. COOKE-DAVIES, "The "real" success factors on projects," International journal of project management, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 185-190, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00067-9; M. D. LYCETT, A. RASSAU, and J. DANSON, "Programme management: a critical review," International journal of project management, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 289-299, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2003.06.001; C. BESNER and B. HOBBS, "An empirical identification of project management toolsets and a comparison among project types," Project Management Journal, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 24-34, 2006.; J. W. CRESWELL, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications, 2014.; R. K. YIN, Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications, 2017.; J. CARDOSO, J. MENDLING, G. NEUMANN, and H. A. REIJERS, "A discourse on novelty in BPM research," in International Conference on Business Process Management, 2006, pp. 1-12.; P. MANDAL and S. DUTTA, "An overview of project management practices in Indian shipbuilding industry," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 303-321, 2018.; S. NEWELL, M. BRESNEN, A. EDELMAN, L. SCARBROUGH, and J. SWAN, "Sharing knowledge across projects: Limits to ICT-led project review practices," Management learning, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 167-185, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507606063441; K. C. LAUDON and J. P. LAUDON, Management information systems: Managing the digital firm. Pearson Education, 2011.; S. HASTIE and M. WOJCIK, "A study of document management and its future in construction industry," in Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), 2011, pp. 3452-3462.; T. H. DAVENPORT, "Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology," Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 331-344, 1994.; A. J. SHENHAR, "One size does not fit all projects: exploring classical contingency domains," Management science, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 394-414, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.3.394.9772; C. D. MANNING, P. RAGHAVAN, and H. SCHÜTZE, Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge university press, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809071; F. T. HARTMAN, "The role of trust in project management," in Project Management Handbook. Jossey-Bass, 2004, pp. 489504.; Y. BENGIO, Y. LECUN, and G. HINTON, "Deep learning," Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436-444, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539; S. H. PARK, S. Y. LEE, and S. H. KIM, "A study on the improvement of knowledge management process for shipbuilding industry," Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Engineering, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1187-1194, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5916/jkosme.2009.33.8.1187; E. W. NGAI, K. K. L. MOON, F. J. RIGGINS, and C. Y. YI, "RFID research: An academic literature review (1995-2005) and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 510-520, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.05.004; I. NONAKA and H. TAKEUCHI, The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford university press, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001; BRESNEN, M., EDELMAN, L., NEWELL, S., SCARBROUGH, H., & SWAN, J. (2003). Social practices and the management of knowledge in project environments. International journal of project management, 21(3), 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00090-X; F. FOWLER, Refactoring: improving the design of existing code. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2018.; A.KUSIAKand C. SMITH,"Design ofcomplex systems: A review," in Proceedings of the 2007 Industrial Engineering Research Conference, 2007, pp. 1521-1526.; M. A. CUSUMANO, "The business of software: What every manager, programmer, and entrepreneur must know to thrive and survive in good times and bad," Simon and Schuster, 2004.; R. AGARWAL and J. PRASAD, "A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology," Information systems research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 204215, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204; D. B. STUMBO, "Engineering documentation control handbook: Configuration management, Second Edition," Configuration Management Journal, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 283, 2002.; K. BI, K. AN, and X. LI, "A Resource Optimization Allocation Strategy for China's Shipbuilding Industry Green Innovation System," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, vol. 17, no. 4, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877020500297; A. J. SHENHAR and D. DVIR, Reinventing project management: the diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Harvard Business Review Press, 2007.; M. ALAVI and D. E. LEIDNER, "Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues," MIS quarterly, pp. 107-136, 2001. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961; J. P. MACDUFFIE, "The road to 'root cause': Shop-floor problem-solving at three auto assembly plants," Management Science, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 479-502, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.4.479; P. S. ADLER, B. GOLDOFTAS, and D. I. LEVINE, "Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system," Organization Science, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 43-68, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.43; R. G. COOPER, "Winning at new products: Accelerating the process from idea to launch," Da Capo Press, 2011.; A. JOBIN, M. IENCA, and E. VAYENA, "The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines," Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 389-399, Sep. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2; R. GUIDOTTI, A. MONREALE, S. RUGGIERI, F. TURINI, F. GIANNOTTI, and D. PEDRESCHI, "A survey of methods for explaining black box models," ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1-42, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236009; C. RUDIN, "Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead," Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 206-215, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x; C. LEE and S. LIM, "Establishment of backcasting-based strategic approach and resilience-based AI governance for the transformation of artificial intelligence in Korean shipbuilding industry," Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 353-369, 2024.; M. GOODMAN, "Accountable by design," Communications of the ACM, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 27-29, Jun. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386366; L. H. GILPIN, D. BAU, B. Z. YUAN, A. BAJWA, M. SPECTER, and L. KAGAL, "Explaining explanations: An overview of interpretability of machine learning," in 2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on data science and advanced analytics (DSAA), 2018, pp. 80-89. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSAA.2018.00018; M. T. RIBEIRO, S. SINGH, and C. GUESTRIN, "'Why Should I Trust You?': Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier," in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016, pp. 1135-1144. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778; T. GEBRU, J. MORGENSTERN, B. VECCHIONE, J. W. VAUGHAN, H. WALLACH, H. DAUMÉ III, and K. CRAWFORD, "Datasheets for datasets," Communications of the ACM, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 86-92, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3458723; A. HOLZINGER, C. BIEMANN, C. S. PATTICHIS, and D. B. KELL, "What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?," arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.09923, 2017.; B. MITTELSTADT, C. RUSSELL and S. WACHTER, "Explaining explanations in AI," in Proceedings of the 2019 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, 2019, pp. 279-288. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287574; D. SHIN, "How users interact with algorithm-based recommendation systems: An integrated model of perceived control, transparency, and trust," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 126, p. 107052, 2022.; S. BAROCAS and A. D. SELBST, "Big data's disparate impact," California Law Review, vol. 104, p. 671, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2477899; N. MEHRABI, F. MORSTATTER, N. SAXENA, K. LERMAN, and A. GALSTYAN, "A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning," ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1-35, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607; I. D. RAJI, A. SMART, R. N. WHITE, M. MITCHELL, T. GEBRU, B. HUTCHINSON, J. SMITH-LOUD, D. THERON, and P. BARNES, "Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing," in Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, 2020, pp. 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372873; R. SANDVIG, K. HAMILTON, K. KARAHALIOS, and C. LANGBORT, "Auditing algorithms: Research methods for detecting discrimination on internet platforms," Data and Discrimination: Converting Critical Concerns into Productive Inquiry, 2014.; M. K. LEE, D. KUSNER, and S. SINGH, "Fairness through awareness," in Proceedings of the 8th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, 2017.; T. BOLUKBASI, K.-W. CHANG, J. Y. ZOU, V. SALIGRAMA, and A. T. KALAI, "Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? debiasing word embeddings," in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2016, pp. 4349-4357.; B. H. ZHANG, B. LEMOINE, and M. MITCHELL, "Mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning," in Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 2018, pp. 335-340. https://doi.org/10.1145/3278721.3278779; T. MILLER, "Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 267, pp. 1-38, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007; C. DWORK, M. HARDT, and T. PITASSI, "Fairness through awareness," in Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1145/2090236.2090255; M. CUMMINGS, "Artificial intelligence and the future of warfare," Chatham House, London, UK, 2017.; B. SHNEIDERMAN, "Human-centered artificial intelligence: Reliable, safe & trustworthy," International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 495-504, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1741118; J. W. CRANDALL, M. OUDAH, F. ISHOWO-OLOKO, S. ABDALLAH, J.-F. BONNEFON, M. AZIZ, and I. RAHWAN, "Cooperating with machines," Nature communications, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02597-8; E. HORVITZ, "Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces," in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 1999, pp. 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1145/302979.303030; P. R. DAUGHERTY and H. J. WILSON, Human + Machine: Reimagining Work in the Age of AI. Harvard Business Review Press, 2018.; A. F. COOPER and E. MOSS, "Accountability in an Algorithmic Society: Relationality, Responsibility, and Robustness in Machine Learning," ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '22), 2022. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533150; I. B. WEINER and R. L. GOLD, Handbook of Psychology, Clinical Psychology, vol. 8. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.; C. B. FREY and M. A. OSBORNE, "The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 114, pp. 254-280, Jan. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019; E. BRYNJOLFSSON and A. McAFEE, The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW Norton & Company, 2014.; D. H. Autor, "Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 3-30, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.3; T. H. DAVENPORT and J. KIRBY, Only humans need apply: Winners and losers in the age of smart machines. Harper Business, 2016.; J. BESSEN, Learning by doing: The real connection between innovation, wages, and wealth. Yale University Press, 2015.; D. ACEMOGLU and P. RESTREPO, "Artificial intelligence, automation, and work," in The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda. University of Chicago Press, 2018, pp. 197-236. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226613475.003.0008; F. ROSSI, "Building trust in artificial intelligence," Journal of International Affairs, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 127-134, 2018.; https://shipjournal.co/index.php/sst/article/view/276
-
7
Autori: a ďalší
Zdroj: International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research (09752366); Jan-Mar2020, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p1060-1073, 14p
-
8
Autori: a ďalší
Zdroj: Behavioral Sciences (2076-328X); Jul2025, Vol. 15 Issue 7, p847, 34p
-
9
Autori: a ďalší
Zdroj: MSphere; Jun2025, Vol. 10 Issue 6, p1-15, 15p
-
10
-
11
Autori: a ďalší
Zdroj: Frontiers in Neurorobotics; 2025, p1-10, 10p
-
12
Autori: a ďalší
Zdroj: Pharmaceutics; Oct2025, Vol. 17 Issue 10, p1309, 36p
-
13
Autori: a ďalší
Zdroj: Cryosphere; 2025, Vol. 19 Issue 10, p4193-4209, 17p
-
14
-
15
Autori:
Zdroj: International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science; Jun2025, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p537-545, 9p
-
16
Autori: MARAPATLA, PENTA RAO
Zdroj: TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology; 2025 Supplement, Vol. 32, p248-262, 15p
-
17
Autori: a ďalší
Zdroj: Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science; Oct2025, Vol. 15 Issue 10, p003-021, 19p
-
18
Autori: a ďalší
Zdroj: Computation; Aug2022, Vol. 10 Issue 8, p129, 20p
-
19
Autori:
Zdroj: Water (20734441); Jul2025, Vol. 17 Issue 13, p1978, 66p
-
20
Autori: a ďalší
Zdroj: Computation; Sep2023, Vol. 11 Issue 9, p182, 31p
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science
Full Text Finder