Search Results - (((programovy OR programovaci) OR programm) OR programovanie) system information

Stroke and PMSI (Medicalisation Information Systems Programm)

Source: Stroke and PMSI Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Specificity

[Information support for system research programs in medical roentgenoradiology].

Transliterated Title: Informatsionnoe obespechenie tselevykh nauchnykh programm po meditsinskoĭ rentgenoradiologii.

Authors: Khnychev SS Litvinova SS Uspenskiĭ VA

Source: Meditsinskaia radiologiia [Med Radiol (Mosk)] 1983 Apr; Vol. 28 (4), pp. 7-10.

Publication Type: English Abstract; Journal Article

Journal Info: Publisher: Izdatelstvo Meditsina Country of Publication: Russia (Federation) NLM ID: 2984767R Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 0025-8334 (Print) Linking ISSN: 00258334 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Med Radiol (Mosk) Subsets: MEDLINE

MeSH Terms: Information Systems* , Radiography* , Radiology* , Systems Analysis*, Prognosis ; Research Design ; USSR

[Evidence-based anti-infective program "ABx" - Online-program for anti-infective therapy broadens functions for local adaptations].

Transliterated Title: Evidenzbasiertes Antiinfektiva-Programm "ABx" - Neue Möglichkeiten durch lokale Anpassung.

Authors: Tafelski S Nachtigall I Trefzer T et al.

Source: Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS [Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther] 2009 Jul; Vol. 44 (7-8), pp. 500-1. Date of Electronic Publication: 2009 Jul 23.

Publication Type: English Abstract; Journal Article

Journal Info: Publisher: Thieme Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 9109478 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1439-1074 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09392661 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther Subsets: MEDLINE

MeSH Terms: Decision Support Systems, Management* , Decision Support Techniques* , Evidence-Based Medicine* , Internet* , Software*, Bacterial Infections/*therapy , Therapy, Computer-Assisted/*methods, Algorithms ; Critical Care/methods ; Germany ; Humans ; Information Dissemination/methods ; Online Systems

Le système touristique comme un facteur de développement local dans les moyennes villes à travers des attractifs: le cas de Fafe au Portugal

Authors: Freitas da Mota, Catarina

Contributors: University/Department: Universitat de Girona. Institut Superior d'Estudis Turístics, University/Department: Universitat de Girona. Departament d'Organització, Gestió empresarial i Disseny de producte

Thesis Advisors: Guia, Jaume, Bataillou, Christian

Source: TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)

Subject Terms: Desenvolupament local, Desarrollo local, Local development, Sistema turístic, Sistema turístico, Turistic system, Ciutats mitjanes, Ciudades medianas, Medium-sized cities, Atractius turístics, Atractivos turísticos, Tourist attractions, Anàlisi SWOT, Análisis SWOT, SWOT analysis, Europe 2020, Portugal 2020, Norte 2020

File Description: application/pdf

Access URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10803/398792

[A simple program for storage and evaluation of medical data on a process computer (author's transl)].

Transliterated Title: Ein einfaches Programm zur Abspeicherung und Auswertung medizinischer Daten auf einem Prozessrechner

Authors: Smidt U

Source: Methods of information in medicine [Methods Inf Med] 1977 Apr; Vol. 16 (2), pp. 96-100.

Publication Type: English Abstract; Journal Article

Journal Info: Publisher: Thieme Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 0210453 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 0026-1270 (Print) Linking ISSN: 00261270 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Methods Inf Med Subsets: MEDLINE

MeSH Terms: Computers* , Information Systems* , Medical History Taking*, Follow-Up Studies ; Longitudinal Studies

Succès de System d'Information : Déterminants de la Satisfaction d'Usager Final avec ERP ; : Information System Success: Antecedents of End-User Satisfaction with ERP

Authors: Kalb Roses, Luis Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion (CERAG) Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 (UPMF)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)

Contributors: Kalb Roses, Luis Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion (CERAG) Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 (UPMF)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)

Source: Colloque de la Association National de Programmes de Post-Graduation en Administration (ENANPAD) ; https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00105705 ; Colloque de la Association National de Programmes de Post-Graduation en Administration (ENANPAD), Sep 2006

Subject Terms: content analysis, End-user computing satisfaction, service quality, structural equation modeling, [SHS.GESTION]Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration

Availability: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00105705

Studying ancient landscapes with Geographic Information Systems

Authors: Vincent Gaffney Zoran Stančič M. Clavel-Lévêque

Contributors: Vincent Gaffney Zoran Stančič M. Clavel-Lévêque

Source: Dialogues d'histoire ancienne 21(2):380-391

Access URL: http://www.persee.fr/doc/dha_0755-7256_1995_num_21_2_2732

Indian Knowledge System

Authors: Kumbhar, Sachin Bhaskar Saptarshi, Dr. Praveen G.

Contributors: Kumbhar, Sachin Bhaskar Saptarshi, Dr. Praveen G.

Subject Terms: NEP 2020, Skill-Based Programmes, Indian Knowledge System, Employment Vedic Literature, Environment, Opportunities, Health, Upanishads, Education, etc

Relation: https://zenodo.org/records/15834935; oai:zenodo.org:15834935; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15834935

Availability: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15834935
https://zenodo.org/records/15834935

Toothbrushing Program in Saudi Arabia 'TOPS'

Authors: Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia Budur Almutairi, Principal Investigator

Contributors: Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia Budur Almutairi, Principal Investigator

Source: Toothbrushing Program in Saudi Arabia "TOPS"- A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in Kindergartens, Riyadh
Borges HC, Garbin CA, Saliba O, Saliba NA, Moimaz SA. Socio-behavioral factors influence prevalence and severity of dental caries in children with primary dentition. Braz Oral Res. 2012 Nov-Dec;26(6):564-70. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242012000600013.
Al-Meedani LA, Al-Dlaigan YH. Prevalence of dental caries and associated social risk factors among preschool children in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Mar-Apr;32(2):452-6. doi: 10.12669/pjms.322.9439.
Wyne AH. Caries prevalence, severity, and pattern in preschool children. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Mar 1;9(3):24-31.
Al-Malik MI, Holt RD, Bedi R. Prevalence and patterns of caries, rampant caries, and oral health in two- to five-year-old children in Saudi Arabia. J Dent Child (Chic). 2003 Sep-Dec;70(3):235-42.
AlMarshad LK, Wyne AH, AlJobair AM. Early childhood caries prevalence and associated risk factors among Saudi preschool children in Riyadh. Saudi Dent J. 2021 Dec;33(8):1084-1090. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.04.003. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
Clark E, Foster Page LA, Larkins K, Leon de la Barra S, Murray Thomson W. Caries-preventive efficacy of a supervised school toothbrushing programme in Northland, New Zealand. Community Dent Health. 2019 Feb 25;36(1):9-16. doi: 10.1922/CDH_4337Clark08.
Borges-Yanez SA, Castrejon-Perez RC, Camacho MEI. Effect of a School-Based Supervised Tooth Brushing Program In Mexico City: A Cluster Randomized Intervention. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;41(3):204-213. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-41.3.204.
Pieper K, Winter J, Krutisch M, Volkner-Stetefeld P, Jablonski-Momeni A. Prevention in kindergartens with 500 ppm fluoride toothpaste-a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Jul;20(6):1159-64. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1604-3. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
Jackson RJ, Newman HN, Smart GJ, Stokes E, Hogan JI, Brown C, Seres J. The effects of a supervised toothbrushing programme on the caries increment of primary school children, initially aged 5-6 years. Caries Res. 2005 Mar-Apr;39(2):108-15. doi: 10.1159/000083155.
Andruskeviciene V, Milciuviene S, Bendoraitiene E, Saldunaite K, Vasiliauskiene I, Slabsinskiene E, Narbutaite J. Oral health status and effectiveness of caries prevention programme in kindergartens in Kaunas city (Lithuania). Oral Health Prev Dent. 2008;6(4):343-8.
Curnow MM, Pine CM, Burnside G, Nicholson JA, Chesters RK, Huntington E. A randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of supervised toothbrushing in high-caries-risk children. Caries Res. 2002 Jul-Aug;36(4):294-300. doi: 10.1159/000063925.
Al-Jundi SH, Hammad M, Alwaeli H. The efficacy of a school-based caries preventive program: a 4-year study. Int J Dent Hyg. 2006 Feb;4(1):30-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2006.00156.x.
Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O'Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, Baird J. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
Almutairi B, Conway D, Ross A, Hattan M, Almogren F, McMahon AD. Toothbrushing programme in Saudi Arabia 'TOPS': a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial in kindergartens, Riyadh. BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 3;14(8):e083504. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083504.

Modelo de evaluación de éxito de sistemas E-government para administraciones tributarias: Reconociendo la creación del valor público desde la perspectiva del contribuyente ; E-government systems’ success evaluation model for tax administrations: recognizing public value creation from the taxpayer’s perspective

Authors: Jaimes Martínez, Cindy Paola Diaz Pinzón, Beatriz Helena Grupo de Investigación en Sistemas y Tecnologías de la Información y de la Comunicación en las Organizaciones Gistic et al.

Contributors: Jaimes Martínez, Cindy Paola Diaz Pinzón, Beatriz Helena Grupo de Investigación en Sistemas y Tecnologías de la Información y de la Comunicación en las Organizaciones Gistic et al.

Subject Terms: 350 - Administración pública y ciencia militar::351 - Administración pública, 000 - Ciencias de la computación, información y obras generales::003 - Sistemas, 330 - Economía::336 - Finanzas públicas, Sistemas e-government, Valor público, Modelo de evaluación de éxito de SI, Administraciones tributarias, Gestión pública, E-government systems, Public value, IS success evaluation model, Tax administrations, Public management, Tributación, Gobierno electrónico, Taxation, Electronic governance, sistema de pago electrónico, e-commerce payment system

File Description: xvii, 231 páginas; application/pdf

Relation: Abdelsalam, H., & Reddick, G. (2012). Success and Failure of Local E- Government Projects: Lessons Learned from Egypt. En S. Kwamena Aikins, Managing E-Government Projects: Concepts, Issues, and Best Practices.; Abdulkareem, A., & Mohd Ramli, R. (2021). Does trust in e-government influence the performance of e-government? An integration of information system success model and public value theory . Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 16(1), 1-17.; Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.; Alhendawi, K., & Baharudin, A. (2017). The Assesment of Information System Effectiveness in e-Learning, e-commerce and e-Government Contexts: A Critical Review and Conceptual Model. . Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 95, 4897-4912.; Alhyari, S., Alazab, M., Alazab, A., Venkatraman, S., & Alazab, M. (2013). Performance evaluation of e-government services using balanced scorecard: An empirical study in Jordan. Benchmarking, 20(4), 512–536.; Alkraiji, A. (2020). An examination of citizen satisfaction with mandatory e-government services: comparison of two information systems success models. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(1), 36-58.; Al-Naimat, A., & Fraihat, A. (2020). E-Government's Service Quality; User perception Significance and Measurement. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 20(10), 101-107.; Al-Rahmi, W., Uddin, M. &., Aldhlan, K., Cifuentes Faura, J., Al-Rahmi, A., & Al-Adwan, A. (2022). Validation of an Integrated IS Success Model in the Study of E-Government. Mobile Information Systems, 1-16.; Al-Sulami, Z., & Hashim, H. (2018). Measuring the success of e-government systems: Applying the success model of the delone and mclean information system. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(22), 7654-7670.; Althonayan, M., & Althonayan, A. (2017). E-government system evaluation: The case of users’ performance using ERP systems in higher education. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(3), 306-342. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2015-0045.; Alzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2018). Investigating the impact of citizens’ trust toward the successful adoption of e-government: A multigroup analysis of gender, age, and internet experience. Information Systems Management, 35(2), 124–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2018.1440730.; AL-Zahrani, M. (2020). Integrating IS success model with cybersecurity factors for e-government implementation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 10 (5), 4937-4955- Doi: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v10i5.pp4937-4955.; Andersen, K. N., Henriksen, H. Z., Medaglia, R., Danziger, J. N., Sannarnes, M. K., & Enemærke, M. (2010). Fads and Facts of e-Government: A Review of Impacts of e-Government (2003–2009). International Journal of Public Administration 33(11), 564–579.; Anwer Anwer, M., Esichaikul, V., Rehman, M., & Anjum, M. (2016). E-government services evaluation from citizen satisfaction perspective: A case of Afghanistan. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 139-167. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-03-2015-0017.; Bailey, J., & Pearson, S. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer. Management Science., 29(5), 530–545.; Bakon, K. A., & Elias, N. F. (2020). Culture and Digital Divide Influence on E-Government Success of Developing Countries: A Literature Review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 1362-1378.; Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, Public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for Research. Government Information Quartely, 31(1), 119-128.; Barbosa, A. F., Pozzebon, M., & Diniz, E. H. (2013). Rethinking E-Government Performance Assessment from a Citizen Perspective. Public Administration, 91(3), 744-762.; Benington, J., & Moore, M. H. (2011). Public Value Theory & Practice. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN.; Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. Harvester Press, 284.; Bhaskar, R. (2008). A Realist Theory of Science. Londres: Routledge.; Bhaskar, R. (2011). Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. Abingdon: Routledge.; Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.; Bryson, J., Crosby, B., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456.; Byrd, T., Thrasher, E., Lang, T., & Davidson, N. (2006). A process-oriented perspective of IS success: examining the impact of IS on operational cost. Omega 34(5), 448–460.; Canales Cerón, M. (2006). Metodologías de investigación social . Santiago de Chile: LOM Ediciones.; Carrera Mora, O. Y., Villafuerte Valdés, L. F., Romero León, D. A., & Reyes Mendoza, S. (2021). Local e-government in México in times of covid-19. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 26(94), 678-695.; Castañeda Rodríguez, V. M. (2012). UNA REVISIÓN DE LOS DETERMINANTES DE LA ESTRUCTURA Y EL RECAUDO TRIBUTARIO: EL CASO LATINOAMERICANO TRAS LA CRISIS DE LA DEUDA EXTERNA. Cuadernos de Economía, 31(58), 77-112.; Católico Segura, D., Suárez Barreto, S. Y., & Velandia Espitia, J. P. (2016). El gobierno electrónico en las administraciones tributarias de America Latina. Logos Ciencia & Tecnología, 7(2), 50-65.; Cebreiro López, B., & Fernández Morante, M. (2004). Estudio de casos. En F. Salvador Mata, J. L. Rodríguez Diéguez, & A. Bolívar Botia, Diccionario enciclopédico de didáctica. Málaga: Aljibe.; CEPAL. (2011). El gobierno electrónico en la gestión pública. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.; Chae, H. C. (2007). IS success model and perceived IT value. Association for Information Systems. 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2007: Reaching New Heights, 7, (págs. 4808–4813).; Chan, S. C., & Ngai, E. W. (2007). A qualitative study of information technology adoption: How ten organizations adopted web-based training. Information Systems Journal, 17(3).; Chen, J. V., Jubilado, R. J., Capistrano, E. P., & Yen, D. C. (2015). Factors affecting online tax filing – An application of the IS success model and trust theory. Computer in Human Behavior,43, 251–262. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.017.; Chen, S.-C., Wu, C.-C., & Miau, S. (2015). Constructing an integrated e-invoice system: The Taiwan experience. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 370-383.; Cochcrane Iberoamérica. (01 de 05 de 2005). https://es.cochrane.org/es. Obtenido de https://es.cochrane.org/sites/es.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/glosario_manual_cochrane_425.pdf; Córdoba, J.-R. (2014). Systemic patterns of practice to improve e-government evaluation. Public Administration and Information Technology, 5, 9-24.; Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.; Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.; DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (1992). information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Journal of Management Information Systems, 3(4), 60-95.; DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4) , 9-30.; Deng, H., Karunasena, K., & Xu, W. (2018). Evaluating the performance of e-Government in developing countries: A public value perspective. Internet Research, 28(1), 169–190. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-10-2016-0296.; DIAN. (08 de 12 de 2021). www.dian.gov.co. Obtenido de dian.gov.co/dian/cifras/Paginas/TributosDIAN.aspx; Díaz-Bravo, L., Torruco-García, U., Martínez-Hernández, M., & Varela Ruiz, M. (2013). La entrevista, recurso flexible y dinámico. Metodología de investigación en educación médica, 162-167.; Doll, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 259–275.; Easton, G., & Harrison, D. (2004). Temporally Embedded Case Comparison in Industrial Marketing Research. En S. Fleetwood, & S. Ackroyd, Critical Realism Applications in Organization and Management Studies (págs. 194-210). Londres: Routledge.; Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2016). Exploratory – Sequential Aproach. En W. A. Edmonds, An applied guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (págs. 201 – 207). Los Angeles: Sage.; Ella, W. (2020). ASSESSING CORRELATION ON E-GOVERNMENT AND TRUST AT LOCAL LEVEL IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. Proceedings on Engineering Sciences 2(3), 237-246.; Escobar Pérez, J., & Cuervo Martínez, A. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición (6) 1, 27-36.; Fernández-Santillán, J. (2018). Valor público, gobernanza y Tercera Vía. Convergencia , 175-193.; Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley Publication Company.; Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.; Floropoulos, J., Spathis, C., Halvatzis, D., & Tsipouridou, M. (2010). Measuring the success of the Greek Taxation Information System. International Journal of Information Management 30, 47–56.; Fu, J. R., Farn, C. K., & Chao, W. P. (2006). Acceptance of electronic tax filing: a study of taxpayer intentions. . Informantion & Management, 43., 109-126.; Furuholt, B., & Wahid, F. ( 2008). E-Government Challenges and the Role of Political Leadership in Indonesia: The Case of Sragen. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Waikoloa, HI, USA: IEEE.; Gable, G. G., Sedera, D., & Chan, T. (2008). Re-conceptualizing Information System Success: The IS-Impact Measurement Model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(7), 377-408.; Garcia-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Desarrollo de estados de la cuestión robustos: Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura. Education in the Knowledge Society, 23, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600 %7C e28600.; Gatian, A. (1994). Is user satisfaction a valid measure of system effectiveness? Information & Management, 26(3), 119–131.; Gemoets, L., Mahmood, M., Adenso-Díaz, B., & Gonzalez, P. (2011). A cross-national comparison of e-government success measures: A theory-based empirical research. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 184-208.; Goh, J. M., & Arenas, A. E. (2020). IT Value Creation in Public Sector: How IT-Enabled Capabilities Mitigate Tradeoffs in Public Organisations. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(1), 25–43.; Gómez Sabaini, J.C.; Morán, D. (2020). Estrategias para abordar la evasión tributaria en América Latina y el Caribe: avances en su medición y panorama de las medidas recientes para reducir su magnitud. Santiago de Chile: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).; Gonzalez, R., Gasco, J., & Llopis, J. (2007). E-government success: some principles from a Spanish case study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(6), 845-861.; Goodhue, D., & Thompson, R. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quaterly, 19(2), 213–236.; Grimsley, M., & Meehan, A. (2007). e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 134-148.; Grover, V., Lyytinen, K., Srinivasan, A., & Tan, B. (2008). Contributing to Rigorous and Forward Thinking Explanatory Theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9, 40-47.; Gupta, K. P., Singh, S., & Bhaskar, P. (2016). Citizen Adoption of e-Government: A Literature Review and Conceptual Framework. Electronic Government, an International Journal 12(2), 160–85.; Gupta, M. P., & Jana, D. (2003). E-government evaluation: a framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 365–387.; Habermas, J. (1984). Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Volumen 1 y 2. . Boston, Massachussets: Beacon Press Books.; Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Hult, T., Danks, N., & Soumya, R. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A workbook. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.; Hefetz, A., & Warner, M. (2004). Privatization and its reverse: explaining the dynamics of the government contracting process. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 14(2), 171–190.; Henman, P. (2010). Governing Electronically: E-Government and the Reconfiguration of Public Administration, Policy and Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.; Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.; Hidayat Ur Rehman, I., Ali Turi, J., Rosak-Szyrocka, J., Alam, M., & Pilař, L. (2023). The role of awareness in appraising the success of E-government systems. Cogent Business & Management, 10, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2186739.; Hooda, A., Gupta, P., Jeyaraj, A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Clarifying the role of e-Government Trust in e-Government Success Models: A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 27, Doi: https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v27i0.4079.; Horan, T. A., Abhichandani, T., & Rayalu, R. (2006). Assessing user satisfaction of egovernment services: development and testing of quality-in-use satisfaction with advanced traveler information systems (ATIS). Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on the System Sciences (HICSS’06).; Hu, G., Lin, H., & Pan, W. (2013). Conceptualizing and Examining e-Government Service Capability: A Review and Empirical Study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(11), 2379-2395.; Huang, Z., & Benyoucef, M. (2014). Usability and Credibility of E-Government Websites. Government Information Quarterly, 584-595.; Ibbott, C. J., & O’Keefe, R. M. (2004). Trust, planning and benefits in a global interorganizational system. Information Systems Journal 14(2), 131–152.; Idoughi, D., & Abdelhakim, D. (2018). Developing Countries E-Government Services Evaluation Identifying and Testing Antecedents of Satisfaction Case of Algeria. International Journal Of Electronic Government Research, 14(1), 63-85.; International Telecommunication Union. (2024). Measuring digital development: The ICT Development Index 2024. Ginebra: ITU Publications.; İskender, G., & Özkan, S. (2015). Analysis of success factors in e-government transformation in Turkey: are these factors really the causes of success?. Information Development, 323-332.; Jaimes Martínez, C. P. (2020). ADOPCIÓN DE LA FACTURACIÓN ELECTRÓNICA Y SU INFLUENCIA EN LA ORGANIZACIÓN. CASO DE ESTUDIO: ENTIDAD DEL SECTOR AGROPECUARIO. Bogotá D.C., Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.; Jaimes Martínez, C. P., & Díaz Pínzón, B. H. (2022). Success evaluation model of E-government systems for tax administrations: Recognizing the public value from the taxpayer's perspective. 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). Madrid: IEEE. DOI:10.23919/CISTI54924.2022.9820607.; Jeyaraj, A. (2020). DeLone & McLean models of information system success: Critical metareview and research directions. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102139. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102139.; Jonker, J., & Pennink, B. (2010). Conceptual Models. En J. Jonker, & B. Pennink, The Essence of Research Methodology (págs. 43-63). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.; Jørgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values – an inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354-381.; Kaisara, G., & Pather, S. (2011). The e-Government evaluation challenge: A South African Batho Pele-aligned service quality approach. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 211-221.; Kaliannan, M., Raman, M., & Dorasamy, M. (2010). Citizens and E-Government: Evaluating Policy and Management. Capitulo: Assessing e-Government Services: The Case of e-Filing of Personal Income Tax in Malaysia. 317-333: IGI GLOBAL.; Keutel, M., Michalik, B., & Richter, J. (2014). Towards mindful case study research in IS: a critical analysis of the past ten years. European Journal of Information Systems, 23., 256–272.; Khatib, H., Lee, H., Suh, C., & Weerakkody, V. (2019). e-Government systems success and user acceptance in developing countries: The role of perceived support quality. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 29(1), 1-34.; Kilani, Y. M. (2021). The moderating role of innovation valance between adoption and actual use of e-government services: an extension of DeLone and McLean information success model. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, 26(3), 273-295.; Klamo, L., Huang, W., Wang, K., & Le, T. (2006). Successfully implementing e-government: Fundamental issues and a case study in the USA. Electronic Government, 3(2), 158-173.; Koh, C., & Prybutok, V. (2003). The three ring model and development of an instrument for measuring dimensions of e-government functions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 34-39.; Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. (2016). Sistemas de información gerencial. Décimocuarta edición. México: PEARSON EDUCACIÓN.; Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. New York: Guilford Publications.; Lee, B. B., Lee, E. H., & Lee, T. (2022). The effect of E-Government website evaluation on user satisfaction and intention to use: the mediating role of warmth and competence judgment on government. Information, Communication & Society, 26(9), 1868-1889. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2041701.; Lee, G. L., & Pai, J. (2005). Influence of environmental and organizational factors on the success of internet‐based interorganizational systems planning. Internet Research, 15(5), 527–543.; Lee, J. (2010). 10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 220-230.; Lucas, H. (1978). Empirical evidence for a descriptive model of implementation. MIS Quaterly, 2(2), 27–42.; MacLean, D., & Titah, R. (2021). A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research on the Impacts of e-Government: A Public Value Perspective. Public Administration Review 82(1), 23-38.; Madsen, C. Ø., & Kræmmergaard, P. (2015). Channel Choice: A Literature Review. Electronic Government. Proceedings of the 14th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference on Electronic Government (EGOV 2015). Thessaloniki, Grecia.; Maldonado, C. (2018). La incorporación de Tecnologías de Información y comunicación en organizaciones gubernamentales y la creación de valor. El caso de la Dirección Nacional de Migraciones (2007-2015). Buenos Aires: Universidad de San Andrés.; Malodia, S., Dhir, A., Mishra, M., & Bhatti, Z. (2021). Future of e-Government: An integrated conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 1-17.; Martínez-Salgado, C. (2012). El muestreo en investigación cualitativa. Principios básicos y algunas controversias. Ciênc. saúde coletiva, 17(3), 613-619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232012000300006.; Mellouli, M., Bouaziz, F., & Bentahar, O. (2020). E-government success assessment from a public value perspective. International Review of Public Administration, 25(3), 153-174. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2020.1799517.; Meneses, J., & Rodriguez, D. (2011). El cuestionario y la entrevista. Universidad Abierta de Cataluña.; Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public value inside: what is public value creation? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 192–219.; Mihuandayani, Utami, E., & Luthfi, E. T. (2018). Text mining based on tax comments as big data analysis using SVM and feature selection. International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT) (págs. 537–542). IEEE.; Miles, M., Huberman, A., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Londrés: Sage.; Mingers, J. (2003). The paucity of multimethod research: a review of the information. Info Systems, 233–249.; Mingers, J. (2004). Real-izing Information Systems: Critical Realism as an Underpinning Philosophy for Information Systems. Information & Organization, 145-153.; Mingers, J., & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega, 25(5), 489–509.; Mingers, J., Mutch, A., & Willcocks, L. (2013). Critical realism in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 795-802.; Moore, M. H. (1994). Public value as the focus of strategy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 53(3), 296-304.; Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value. Strategic Management in Government. USA: Harvard University Press.; Moore, M. H. (2014). Public Value Accounting: Establishing the Philosophical Basis. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 465–477.; Morales, V., & Bayona, S. (2019). Critical success factors in the development of e-government: A systematic review of the literature %7C [Factores Críticos de Éxito en el Desarrollo de E-Gobierno: Revisión Sistemática de la Literatura]. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao (E23), 233-247.; Morales, V., Bayona, S., & Morales, J. (2020). Categorization of critical success factors in the development of e-government %7C [Categorización de factores críticos de éxito en el desarrollo de e-gobierno]. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao, 590-602.; Müller, S. D., & Skau, S. A. (2015). Success factors influencing implementation of e-government at different stages of maturity: a literature review. Int. J. Electronic Governance, 7 (2), 136-170.; Nam, T. (2014). Determining the type of e-government use. . Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 211–220. Doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.09.006.; Nguyen, T. D., Nguyen, J. M., & Cao, T. H. (2015). Information Systems Success: A Literature Review. En Lecture Notes in Computer Science (págs. 242–256). DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-26135-5_18.; Nookhao, S. K. (2023). Achieving a successful e-government: Determinants of behavioral intention from Thai citizens’ perspective. Heliyon, 9(8).; Nusir, M., & Bell, D. (2013). Systematic Literature Review: Taxonomy of Services in e-Government. UK Academy for Information Systems Conference Proceedings 2013.; OECD. (2001). Understanding the Digital Divide. Paris: OECD Publishing. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/236405667766.; Orlikowski, W. (1992). The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 3(3), 398–427.; Ortiz-Rodríguez, F., Mishra Tiwari, S., Amara, F. Z., & Sahagun, M. (2023). E-Government Success: An End-User Perspective. En J. M. Medina-Quintero, & A. J. Sahagun M. A., Global Perspectives on the Strategic Role of Marketing Information Systems (págs. 168-186). IGI Global.; Owusu, A. (2023). Assessing the impact of e-government systems from citizens' perspective: evidence from Ghana. . Electronic Government, 19(3), 376-400. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2023.130583.; Owusu, A., Akpe-Doe, C., & Taana, I. (2022). Assessing the Effectiveness of E-Government Services in Ghana: A Case of the Registrar General's Department. . International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 18, 1-21.; Parada Corrales, J. (2004). Realismo crítico en investigación en ciencias sociales: una introducción. Investigación & Desarrollo, 12 (2), 396-429.; Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. En J. Dawson, F. A., & L. Sparks, The Retailing Reader (págs. 30-51). New York: Routledge.; Paré, G. (2004). Investigating information systems with positivist case study. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13(1), 233-264.; Parra Jiménez, O. D., & Patino Jacinto, R. A. (2010). Evasión de impuestos nacionales en Colombia: años 2001 - 2009. Revista Facultad De Ciencias Económicas, 18(2), 177-198.; Peña, J. I., Díaz, B. H., & Favier, M. (2010). Multiméthodologie dans la recherche en systèmes d’information. Deux exemples de recherche en cours en Colombie. París.; Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2012). The Past, Present, and Future of “IS Success.”. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(5), 341–362.; Petter, S., Delone, W., & Mclean, E. (2013). Information systems success: the quest for the independet variables. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 7-61.; Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.; Rahman, A. (2015). Toward a Comprehensive Conceptualization of Digital Divide and its Impact on E-Government System Success. En M. Quaddus, & A. G. Woodside, E-Services Adoption: Processes by Firms in Developing (págs. 291-488). Emerald Publishing Limited. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1069-096420150000023003.; Rainer, R., & Watson, H. (1995). The keys to executive information system success. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(2), 83–98.; Rana, N., Dwivedi, Y., Williams, M., & Weerakkody, V. (2015). Investigating success of an e-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(1), 127-142.; Reddick, G. (2004). Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers? Government Information Quarterly, (22), 38-57.; Rigdon, E. E., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2017). On Comparing Results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM : Five Perspectives and Five Recommendations. Marketing: ZFP – Journal of Research and Management, 39(3), 4–16.; Ringle, C., Wende, S., & Becker, J. (Accedido: 18 de noviembre de 2024). SmartPLS 4. Disponible en: https://www.smartpls.com/documentation.; Robbins, G., Mulligan, E., & Keenan, F. (2015). e-Government in the Irish Revenue: The Revenue On-Line Service (ROS): A success story? Financial Accountability and Management, 31(4), 363-394.; Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.; Ruel, E., Wagner, W. E., & Gilllespie, B. J. (2016). The practice of survey research: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.; Ruiz, M. A., Pardo, A., & San Martín, R. (2010). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 34-45.; Saunders, M. N. (2019). Capitulo 4: Understanding research philosophy and approaches ti theory development. En M. N. Saunders, P. Lewis, & A. Thornhill, Research methods for business students (págs. 128-171). Reino Unido: Pearson Education Limited.; Scott, M., DeLone, W., & Golden, W. (2016). Measuring eGovernment success: a public value approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 187-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.11.; Seddon, P. B. (1997). respecification and extension of the DeLone and Mc Lean model of IS success. Information systems research, 8(3), 240-253.; Sedera, D. (2006). Enterprise system success: a measurement model. Queensland, Australia: Queensland University of Technology.; Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. (2019). Evaluación de modelos predictivos en PLS-SEM: pautas para usar PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53 (11), 2322-2347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189.; Siddaway, A., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. (2019). How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Meta-syntheses. . Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747-770.; Singh, H., Grover, P., Kar, A., & Ilavarasan, V. (2020). Review of performance assessment frameworks of e-government projects. . Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(1), Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-02-2019-0011.; Soper, D. (11 de 21 de 2024). A-priori Sample Size Calculator for Structural Equation Models [Software]. . Obtenido de https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc; Sorongan, E., & Hidayati, Q. (2020). Integration of eucs variables into delone and mclean models for E-government evaluation: Conceptual models. Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 6(1), 32-42.; Stefanovic, D., Marjanovic, U., Delić, M., Culibrk, D., & Lalic, B. (2016). Assessing the success of e-government systems: An employee perspective. . Information & Management, 53(6), 717–726. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.02.007 .; Sterrenberg, G., & L'Espoir Decosta, P. (2023). Identifying the crucial factors of e-government success from the perspective of Australian citizens living with disability using a public value approach. Government Information Quarterly, 40 (3), 101813.; Sugumaran, V., & Arogyaswamy, B. (2003). Measuring it performance: “Contingency”. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(2), 79-86.; Teo, T. S., Srivastava, S. C., & Jiang, L. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99-131.; Teo, T., & Wong, P. (2005). Implementing electronic filing of tax returns: insights form. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application, 7(2), 3-16.; Thomas, P. (2006). Information systems success and technology acceptance within government organization. Association for Information Systems - 12th Americas Conference On Information Systems, (págs. 4404–4411).; Titah, R., & Barki, H. (2006). e-Government Adoption and Acceptance: A Literature Review. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 2(3), 23–57.; Torres, M., Vásquez, C., & Viloria, A. (2010). GESTIÓN Y CALIDAD DE LA INFORMACIÓN EN EL GOBIERNO ELECTRÓNICO. Universidad, Ciencia y Tecnología.; Twizeyimana, J., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36, 167–178.; United Nations. (2018). UNITED NATIONS E-GOVERNMENT SURVEY 2018. New York: United Nations.; United Nations E-government survey 2024. (2024). Nueva York: United Nations.; Van Maanen, J., Sørensen, J., & Mitchell, T. (2007). The interplay between theory and method. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1145-1154.; Veeramootoo, N., Nunkoo, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). What determines success of an e-government service? Validation of an integrative model of e-filing continuance usage. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 161–174. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.004.; Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.; Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.; Venkatesh, V., Sykes, T. A., & Venkatraman, S. (2014). Understanding e-Government portal use in rural India: role of demographic and personality characteristics. . Information Systems Journal, 24(3), 249–269. Doi:10.1111/isj.12008.; Verkijika, S., & De Wet, L. (2018). A usability assessment of e-government websites in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 20-29.; Vogt, W. P., Vogt, E. R., Gardner, D. C., & Haeffele, L. M. (2014). Selecting the right analyses. New York: Guilford.; Wakhu, S., He, J., & Xu, F. (2019). The 3D Integrated Model for E-Government Systems Success: A Case of the e-EIA System in Kenya. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARY ARCHIVES AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 29(1), 63-78.; Wang, Y. S., & Liao, Y. W. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone. Government Information Quarterly, 25(4), 717–733.; Westland, J. (2012). Erratum to ‘‘Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling’’. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications (10), 445; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2012.06.001.; Westland, J. C. (2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications (9), 476-487.; Will, D. J. (1981). Roy Bhaskar, A realist theory of science, Brighton, Sussex, Harvester Press, 1978, (1st ed., 1975), 8vo, pp. 284, £3.95 (paperback). - Roy Bhaskar, The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Medical History, 25(1), 91-92.; Wynn, D., & Williams, C. (2012). PRINCIPLES FOR CONDUCTING CRITICAL REALIST CASE STUDY RESEARCH IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 787-810.; Yin, R. (2003). Case Study Research, Design and Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.; https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/88224; Universidad Nacional de Colombia; Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia; https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/

Availability: https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/88224
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/

REGULATORY SUPPORT AND THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE SYSTEM INFORMATION MONITORING THE SAFETY OF OPERATIONS IN AVIATION

Authors: G. E. Glukhov I. G. Kirpichev P. E. Chernikov

Source: Научный вестник МГТУ ГА, Iss 218, Pp 34-38 (2016)

Subject Terms: information system, safety oversight, continuous monitoring approach, universal safety oversight audit programme, regulations, system functions, Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics, TL1-4050

Relation: https://avia.mstuca.ru/jour/article/view/275; https://doaj.org/toc/2079-0619; https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0119; https://doaj.org/article/62fb0180954d4d96b309d280c08a2d77

Availability: https://doaj.org/article/62fb0180954d4d96b309d280c08a2d77

Entwicklung eines Editors zur Erstellung und Bearbeitung Pflegerischer Informationsobjekte (PIOs) zur Pflegeüberleitung.

Alternate Title: Development of an editor for creating and editing PIOs (care information objects) for care transition.

Authors: Regner, Matthias Werlitz, Viktor Kleybolte, Lukas et al.

Source: GMS Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie. 2024, Vol. 20, p1-9. 9p.

Subject Terms: *DIGITAL technology, *COMPUTER software, *HOSPITAL nursing staff, *NURSING, *TRANSITIONAL care, *AUTOMATION, *SOFTWARE architecture

Geographic Terms: GERMANY

Statistical Multiplexing of H.264 programms

Authors: Teixeira, Luis Miguel Lopes Corte-Real, Luís Veritati

Contributors: Teixeira, Luis Miguel Lopes Corte-Real, Luís Veritati

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: 978-1-4244-1355-3

Availability: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/4475

Research Prioritization for Health Science and Innovation: A Methodological Approach ; Priorización de la investigación para potenciar la ciencia y la innovación en salud: propuesta metodológica

Authors: Hernández-Nariño, Arialys Medina-Nogueira, Yuly-Esther Camero-Benavides, Laura-Beatriz et al.

Source: Revista Científica; Vol. 43 No. 1 (2022): January-April 2022; 141-157 ; Revista Científica; Vol. 43 Núm. 1 (2022): Enero-Abril 2022; 141-157 ; 2344-8350 ; 0124-2253

Subject Terms: information analysis, evaluation, healthcare research, methodology, priorities, análisis de información, evaluación, investigación en salud, metodología, prioridades

File Description: text/xml; application/pdf

Relation: https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/revcie/article/view/18173/18017; https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/revcie/article/view/18173/18021; Alcido, M. R. H., Oraño, J. V., Geroy, L. S. A. (2019). Applying knowledge management in generating and using evidence in health research priority setting (HRPS). Acta Medica Philippina, 53(3), e160. https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.v53i3.160; Ali, M., Seuc, A., Rahimi, A., Festin, M., Temmerman, M. (2014). A global research agenda for family planning: Results of an exercise for setting research priorities. Bull World Health Organ, 92, 93-98. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.13.122242; Altman, M. R., Kim, J., Busse, M., Kantrowitz-Gordon, I. (2020). Community-led research priority setting for highly vulnerable communities: Adaptation of the research prioritization by affected communities protocol. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619833858; Álvarez-Corredera, M., Artiles-Visbal, L., Otero-Iglesias, J., Cabrera-Cruz, N. (2010). Priority setting in health research in Cuba, 2010. MEDICC, 12(4), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.37757/MR2010.V12.N4.4; Artiles Visbal, L., Otero Iglesias, J., Barrios Osuna, I. (2008). Metodología de la Investigación para las Ciencias de la Salud. Editorial Ciencias Médicas; Becerra-Posada, F., Salgado de Snyder, N., Cuervo, L. G., Montorzi, G. (2014). Agendas de investigación priorizadas: un recurso estratégico para la salud en América Latina. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública (RPSP), 36(6), 361-367. https://www.scielosp.org/pdf/rpsp/2014.v36n6/361-367/es; Bressan, S., Titomanlio, L., Gómez, B., Mintege, S., Gervaix, A., Parri, N., Da Dalt, L., Moll, H. A., Waisman, Y., Maconochie, I., Oostenbrink, R. (2019). Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 104(9), 869-873. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-316918; Caballero, P., Yagui, M., Espinoza, M., Castilla, T., Granados, A., Velásquez, A., Cabezas, C. (2010). Prioridades regionales y nacionales de investigación en salud, Perú 2010-2014: un proceso con enfoque participativo y descentralista. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, 27(3), 398-411; Chan, G., Storey, J. D., Das, M. K., Sacks, E., Johri, M., Kabakian-Khasholian, T., Paudel, D., Yoshida, S., Portela, A. (2020). Global research priorities for social, behavioural and community engagement interventions for maternal, newborn and child health. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18, e97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00597-7; Considine, J., Curtis, K., Shaban, R. Z., Fry, M. (2018). Consensus-based clinical research priorities for emergency nursing in Australia. Australasian Emergency Care, 21(2), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2018.03.001; De Bortoli Cassiani, S. H., Bassalobre-Garcia, A., Reveiz, L. (2015). Universal access to health and universal health coverage: Identification of nursing research priorities in Latin America. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 23(6), 1195-1208. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.1075.2667; Fuentes, J. C., Cañón, L. A., Pérez, Á. V., Pinzón, C. E., Pérez, A. M., Avellaneda, P. A., Morales, Á. E., Fernández, J. E. (2018). Metodologías para la priorización en investigación en salud: una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 41, 122. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2017.122; García López, M. G. (2016). Diagnóstico y propuesta de líneas prioritarias de investigación y desarrollo en biotecnología para el laboratorio de fabricación digital en el Amazonas, periodo 2016-2030 [Tesis de maestría]. Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Perú; Gómez García, A. R., Suasnavas Bermúdez, P. R., Vilaret Serpa, A., Silva Peñaherrera, M. G., Russo Puga, M. (2016). Propuesta metodológica para el establecimiento de líneas de investigación en seguridad y salud en el trabajo. Innova Research Journal, 1(9), 13-25. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5920519; Guerra-Betancourt, K., Morejón-Borjas, M., Fornet-Hernández, E., de la Cruz-Fuxá, A. M. (2018). Jerarquización de prioridades para la gestión de la innovación a nivel territorial. Ciencias Holguín, 24(2), 25-36; Humphries, D. L., Ingber, H., Gurung, M. S., Khoshnood, K. (2019). Methodology and criteria for setting national health research priorities in Bhutan: A workshop report. Bhutan Health Journal, 5(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.47811/bhj.78; Iriarte Cárcamo, C. R. (2015). La definición de prioridades como componentes del planeamiento en ciencia y tecnología para la universidad: el caso de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras. Revista Cubana de Educación Superior, 34(1), 107-129; Kapiriri, L., Chanda-Kapata, P. (2018). The quest for a framework for sustainable and institutionalised priority-setting for health research in a low-resource setting: The case of Zambia. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0268-7; López Lara, R. (2018). El análisis de situación de salud poblacional en América Latina y el Caribe, entre 2000 y 2017: reflexiones y desafíos. Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública, 36(3), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v36n3a03; Martínez Calvo, S. (2013). Renovación del Análisis de Situación de Salud en los servicios de medicina familiar en Cuba. Revista Cubana de Salud Pública, 39, 752-762. https://www.scielosp.org/article/rcsp/2013.v39n4/752-762/; Medina Nogueira, Y. E., Medina León, A., El Assafiri Ojeda, Y., Nogueira Rivera, D. (2020). Análisis de las investigaciones sobre gestión por procesos: una revisión para América Latina y el Caribe. En Prácticas socio administrativas para la competitividad, emprendimiento y mercadotecnia digital: una visión desde la licenciatura (pp. 17-39). Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí; Ranson, K., Law, T., Bennett, S. (2010). Establishing health systems financing research priorities in developing countries using a participatory methodology. Social Science & Medicine, 70(12), 1933-1942; Reveiz, L., Pinzón-Flórez, C., Glujovsky, D., Elias, V., Ordunez, P. (2018). Establecimiento de prioridades de investigación en la enfermedad renal crónica de causas no tradicionales en Centroamérica. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 42, e13. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2018.13; Rodríguez Perón, J. M., Aldana Vilas, L., Villalobos Hevia, N. (2010). Método Delphi para la identificación de prioridades de ciencia e innovación tecnológica. Revista Cubana de Medicina Militar, 39(3-4), 221-226; Rojo Pérez, N., Valentti Pérez, C., Martínez Trujillo, N., Morales Suárez, I., Martínez Torres, E., Fleitas Estéves, I., Portuondo Sao, M., Torres Rojo, Y., Sierra González, V. G. (2018). Ciencia e innovación tecnológica en la salud en Cuba: resultados en problemas seleccionados. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 42, e32. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2018.32; Rzewuska, M., Charani, E., Clarkson, J. E., Davey, P. G., Duncan, E. M., Francis, J. J., Gillies, K., Kern, W. V., Lorencatto, F., Marwick, C. A., McEwen, J., Möhler, R., Morris, A. M., Ramsay, C. R., Rogers Van Katwyk, S., Skodvin, B., Smith, I., Suh, K. N., Grimshaw, J. M. (2019). Prioritizing research areas for antibiotic stewardship programmes in hospitals: a behavioural perspective consensus paper. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 25(2), 163-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.08.020; Suarez Guzman, L. M., Escobar Marulanda, N. M., Zartha Sossa, J. W. (2020). Estudio de prospectiva al 2032 de la cadena de plátano, un enfoque hacia los programas académicos del sector agroindustrial. Información tecnológica, 31(6), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642020000600095; Tenorio-Mucha, J., Soto-Becerra, P., García-Mostajo, J., Maguiña, J. L., Culquichicón, C., Zeta-Ruiz, N., Matassini, S., Borjas-Félix, A., Araujo-Castillo, R. V., Suárez, V., Hurtado, Y. (2020). Proceso de definición de prioridades institucionales de investigación en el Seguro Social de Salud del Perú, 2020-2022. Revista del Cuerpo Médico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo, 13(2), 146-154. https://doi.org/10.35434/rcmhnaaa.2020.132.665; Thornton, P. K., Whitbread, A., Baedeker, T., Cairns, J., Claessens, L., Baethgen, W., Bunn, C., Friedmann, M., Giller, K. E., Herrero, M., Howden, M., Kilcline, K., Nangia, V., Ramirez-Villegas, J., Kumar, S., West, P. C., Keating, B. (2018). A framework for priority-setting in climate smart agriculture research. Agricultural Systems, 167, 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.09.009; Tomlinson, M., Jordans, M., MacMillan, H., Betancourt, T., Hunt, X., Mikton, C. (2017). Research priority setting for integrated early child development and violence prevention (ECD+) in low and middle income countries: An expert opinion exercise. Child Abuse & Neglect, 72, 131-139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.07.021; Traverso Vior, N., Chuit, R., Mejía, R. (2019). Agenda Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública. Revista Argentina de Salud Pública, 10(41), 58-61; Yoshida, S. (2016). Approaches, tools and methods used for setting priorities in health research in the 21st century. Journal of Global Health, 6(1), e010507; https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/revcie/article/view/18173

Availability: https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/revcie/article/view/18173

Development of theoretical bases and toolkit for information processing in hypercomplex numerical systems

Authors: Sinkov, M. Kalinovskyi, Y. Boyarinova, Y. et al.

Source: Pomiary, Automatyka, Komputery w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska.

Subject Terms: hiperkompleksowy system numeryczny, przetwarzanie danych, operacje liniowe, operacje nieliniowe, obliczenia modułowe, hypercomplex numerical systems, data processing, linear operations, nonlinear operations, modular calculations

Access URL: http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BPB7-0007-0013

INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM ENCODED WITH COMPUTER READABLE INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAMM

Re-Envisioning Distributed Collections in German Research Libraries - A View from the U.S.A.

Authors: Walker, Kizer¹

Source: Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis. Apr2015, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p7-12. 6p.

Subject Terms: *RESEARCH libraries, *INFORMATION resources management, *AUTOMATIC data collection systems, *LIBRARY resources

Geographic Terms: UNITED States

Eurocertification of information and documentation professionals.

Alternate Title: Eurozertifizierung der Fachleute im Bereich Information & Dokumentation (Library and Information Services).
Eurocertificación de los profesionales de la información y documentación (Library and Información Services).
Eurocertification des professionnels de l'information et documentation (Library and Information Services).

Authors: Battisti, Michèle Michele.Battisti@adbs.fr

Source: Documentaliste: Sciences de l'Information. oct2004, Vol. 41 Issue 4/5, p281-283. 3p.

Subject Terms: Information services, Documentation, Professional employees, Seminars, Library information networks

Company/Entity: European Commission

Score matching the descriptor density of states for model-agnostic free energy estimation.

Authors: Swinburne TD Lapointe C Marinica MC

Source: Nature communications [Nat Commun] 2025 Dec 08. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Dec 08.

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal Info: Publisher: Nature Pub. Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101528555 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2041-1723 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20411723 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Nat Commun Subsets: MEDLINE

DMPE: A Dual-Branch Molecular Property Encapsulation Framework With Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks.

Authors: Duo L Tang B Hirst JD et al.

Source: Journal of computational chemistry [J Comput Chem] 2025 Nov 15; Vol. 46 (30), pp. e70273.

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal Info: Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9878362 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1096-987X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 01928651 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Comput Chem Subsets: MEDLINE

MeSH Terms: Drug Discovery* , Antineoplastic Agents*/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents*/chemistry , Protein Kinase Inhibitors*/pharmacology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors*/chemistry, Humans ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors ; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism ; Monte Carlo Method ; Molecular Structure