Search Results - ((((programovy OR programy) OR programovaci) OR programm) OR programovanie) system information

Refine Results
  1. 1

    Contributors: University/Department: Universitat de Girona. Institut Superior d'Estudis Turístics, University/Department: Universitat de Girona. Departament d'Organització, Gestió empresarial i Disseny de producte

    Thesis Advisors: Guia, Jaume, Bataillou, Christian

    Source: TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)

    File Description: application/pdf

  2. 2
  3. 3

    Source: Nature communications [Nat Commun] 2025 Dec 08. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Dec 08.

    Publication Type: Journal Article

    Journal Info: Publisher: Nature Pub. Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101528555 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2041-1723 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20411723 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Nat Commun Subsets: MEDLINE

  4. 4

    Source: Moreira, F., Ferreira, M. J., Collazos, C. A., & Cano, S. (2017). Profile-oriented programming teaching to non-technical students: A case study. In Proceedings of the Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI2017) 12th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Lisbon, Portugal, 21-22 June 2017 (pp. 1887-1893). Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2412

    File Description: application/pdf

  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

    Transliterated Title: Informatsionnoe obespechenie tselevykh nauchnykh programm po meditsinskoĭ rentgenoradiologii.

    Source: Meditsinskaia radiologiia [Med Radiol (Mosk)] 1983 Apr; Vol. 28 (4), pp. 7-10.

    Publication Type: English Abstract; Journal Article

    Journal Info: Publisher: Izdatelstvo Meditsina Country of Publication: Russia (Federation) NLM ID: 2984767R Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 0025-8334 (Print) Linking ISSN: 00258334 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Med Radiol (Mosk) Subsets: MEDLINE

  8. 8

    Transliterated Title: Evidenzbasiertes Antiinfektiva-Programm "ABx" - Neue Möglichkeiten durch lokale Anpassung.

    Source: Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS [Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther] 2009 Jul; Vol. 44 (7-8), pp. 500-1. Date of Electronic Publication: 2009 Jul 23.

    Publication Type: English Abstract; Journal Article

    Journal Info: Publisher: Thieme Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 9109478 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1439-1074 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09392661 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther Subsets: MEDLINE

  9. 9
  10. 10

    Source: Kolasa, Władysław Marek and Rogoż, Michał . Polskie programy biblioteczne dla małych i średnich bibliotek publicznych - raport 2002., 2003 In: Komputeryzacja i informacja elektroniczna w bibliotekach publicznych. Stowarzyszenie Bibliotekarzy Polskich, pp. 39-78. [Book chapter]

    File Description: text

  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

    File Description: xvii, 231 páginas; application/pdf

    Relation: Abdelsalam, H., & Reddick, G. (2012). Success and Failure of Local E- Government Projects: Lessons Learned from Egypt. En S. Kwamena Aikins, Managing E-Government Projects: Concepts, Issues, and Best Practices.; Abdulkareem, A., & Mohd Ramli, R. (2021). Does trust in e-government influence the performance of e-government? An integration of information system success model and public value theory . Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 16(1), 1-17.; Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.; Alhendawi, K., & Baharudin, A. (2017). The Assesment of Information System Effectiveness in e-Learning, e-commerce and e-Government Contexts: A Critical Review and Conceptual Model. . Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 95, 4897-4912.; Alhyari, S., Alazab, M., Alazab, A., Venkatraman, S., & Alazab, M. (2013). Performance evaluation of e-government services using balanced scorecard: An empirical study in Jordan. Benchmarking, 20(4), 512–536.; Alkraiji, A. (2020). An examination of citizen satisfaction with mandatory e-government services: comparison of two information systems success models. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(1), 36-58.; Al-Naimat, A., & Fraihat, A. (2020). E-Government's Service Quality; User perception Significance and Measurement. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 20(10), 101-107.; Al-Rahmi, W., Uddin, M. &., Aldhlan, K., Cifuentes Faura, J., Al-Rahmi, A., & Al-Adwan, A. (2022). Validation of an Integrated IS Success Model in the Study of E-Government. Mobile Information Systems, 1-16.; Al-Sulami, Z., & Hashim, H. (2018). Measuring the success of e-government systems: Applying the success model of the delone and mclean information system. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(22), 7654-7670.; Althonayan, M., & Althonayan, A. (2017). E-government system evaluation: The case of users’ performance using ERP systems in higher education. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(3), 306-342. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2015-0045.; Alzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2018). Investigating the impact of citizens’ trust toward the successful adoption of e-government: A multigroup analysis of gender, age, and internet experience. Information Systems Management, 35(2), 124–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2018.1440730.; AL-Zahrani, M. (2020). Integrating IS success model with cybersecurity factors for e-government implementation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 10 (5), 4937-4955- Doi: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v10i5.pp4937-4955.; Andersen, K. N., Henriksen, H. Z., Medaglia, R., Danziger, J. N., Sannarnes, M. K., & Enemærke, M. (2010). Fads and Facts of e-Government: A Review of Impacts of e-Government (2003–2009). International Journal of Public Administration 33(11), 564–579.; Anwer Anwer, M., Esichaikul, V., Rehman, M., & Anjum, M. (2016). E-government services evaluation from citizen satisfaction perspective: A case of Afghanistan. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 139-167. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-03-2015-0017.; Bailey, J., & Pearson, S. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer. Management Science., 29(5), 530–545.; Bakon, K. A., & Elias, N. F. (2020). Culture and Digital Divide Influence on E-Government Success of Developing Countries: A Literature Review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 1362-1378.; Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, Public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for Research. Government Information Quartely, 31(1), 119-128.; Barbosa, A. F., Pozzebon, M., & Diniz, E. H. (2013). Rethinking E-Government Performance Assessment from a Citizen Perspective. Public Administration, 91(3), 744-762.; Benington, J., & Moore, M. H. (2011). Public Value Theory & Practice. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN.; Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. Harvester Press, 284.; Bhaskar, R. (2008). A Realist Theory of Science. Londres: Routledge.; Bhaskar, R. (2011). Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. Abingdon: Routledge.; Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.; Bryson, J., Crosby, B., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456.; Byrd, T., Thrasher, E., Lang, T., & Davidson, N. (2006). A process-oriented perspective of IS success: examining the impact of IS on operational cost. Omega 34(5), 448–460.; Canales Cerón, M. (2006). Metodologías de investigación social . Santiago de Chile: LOM Ediciones.; Carrera Mora, O. Y., Villafuerte Valdés, L. F., Romero León, D. A., & Reyes Mendoza, S. (2021). Local e-government in México in times of covid-19. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 26(94), 678-695.; Castañeda Rodríguez, V. M. (2012). UNA REVISIÓN DE LOS DETERMINANTES DE LA ESTRUCTURA Y EL RECAUDO TRIBUTARIO: EL CASO LATINOAMERICANO TRAS LA CRISIS DE LA DEUDA EXTERNA. Cuadernos de Economía, 31(58), 77-112.; Católico Segura, D., Suárez Barreto, S. Y., & Velandia Espitia, J. P. (2016). El gobierno electrónico en las administraciones tributarias de America Latina. Logos Ciencia & Tecnología, 7(2), 50-65.; Cebreiro López, B., & Fernández Morante, M. (2004). Estudio de casos. En F. Salvador Mata, J. L. Rodríguez Diéguez, & A. Bolívar Botia, Diccionario enciclopédico de didáctica. Málaga: Aljibe.; CEPAL. (2011). El gobierno electrónico en la gestión pública. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.; Chae, H. C. (2007). IS success model and perceived IT value. Association for Information Systems. 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2007: Reaching New Heights, 7, (págs. 4808–4813).; Chan, S. C., & Ngai, E. W. (2007). A qualitative study of information technology adoption: How ten organizations adopted web-based training. Information Systems Journal, 17(3).; Chen, J. V., Jubilado, R. J., Capistrano, E. P., & Yen, D. C. (2015). Factors affecting online tax filing – An application of the IS success model and trust theory. Computer in Human Behavior,43, 251–262. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.017.; Chen, S.-C., Wu, C.-C., & Miau, S. (2015). Constructing an integrated e-invoice system: The Taiwan experience. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 370-383.; Cochcrane Iberoamérica. (01 de 05 de 2005). https://es.cochrane.org/es. Obtenido de https://es.cochrane.org/sites/es.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/glosario_manual_cochrane_425.pdf; Córdoba, J.-R. (2014). Systemic patterns of practice to improve e-government evaluation. Public Administration and Information Technology, 5, 9-24.; Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.; Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.; DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (1992). information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Journal of Management Information Systems, 3(4), 60-95.; DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4) , 9-30.; Deng, H., Karunasena, K., & Xu, W. (2018). Evaluating the performance of e-Government in developing countries: A public value perspective. Internet Research, 28(1), 169–190. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-10-2016-0296.; DIAN. (08 de 12 de 2021). www.dian.gov.co. Obtenido de dian.gov.co/dian/cifras/Paginas/TributosDIAN.aspx; Díaz-Bravo, L., Torruco-García, U., Martínez-Hernández, M., & Varela Ruiz, M. (2013). La entrevista, recurso flexible y dinámico. Metodología de investigación en educación médica, 162-167.; Doll, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 259–275.; Easton, G., & Harrison, D. (2004). Temporally Embedded Case Comparison in Industrial Marketing Research. En S. Fleetwood, & S. Ackroyd, Critical Realism Applications in Organization and Management Studies (págs. 194-210). Londres: Routledge.; Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2016). Exploratory – Sequential Aproach. En W. A. Edmonds, An applied guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (págs. 201 – 207). Los Angeles: Sage.; Ella, W. (2020). ASSESSING CORRELATION ON E-GOVERNMENT AND TRUST AT LOCAL LEVEL IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. Proceedings on Engineering Sciences 2(3), 237-246.; Escobar Pérez, J., & Cuervo Martínez, A. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición (6) 1, 27-36.; Fernández-Santillán, J. (2018). Valor público, gobernanza y Tercera Vía. Convergencia , 175-193.; Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley Publication Company.; Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.; Floropoulos, J., Spathis, C., Halvatzis, D., & Tsipouridou, M. (2010). Measuring the success of the Greek Taxation Information System. International Journal of Information Management 30, 47–56.; Fu, J. R., Farn, C. K., & Chao, W. P. (2006). Acceptance of electronic tax filing: a study of taxpayer intentions. . Informantion & Management, 43., 109-126.; Furuholt, B., & Wahid, F. ( 2008). E-Government Challenges and the Role of Political Leadership in Indonesia: The Case of Sragen. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Waikoloa, HI, USA: IEEE.; Gable, G. G., Sedera, D., & Chan, T. (2008). Re-conceptualizing Information System Success: The IS-Impact Measurement Model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(7), 377-408.; Garcia-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Desarrollo de estados de la cuestión robustos: Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura. Education in the Knowledge Society, 23, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600 %7C e28600.; Gatian, A. (1994). Is user satisfaction a valid measure of system effectiveness? Information & Management, 26(3), 119–131.; Gemoets, L., Mahmood, M., Adenso-Díaz, B., & Gonzalez, P. (2011). A cross-national comparison of e-government success measures: A theory-based empirical research. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 184-208.; Goh, J. M., & Arenas, A. E. (2020). IT Value Creation in Public Sector: How IT-Enabled Capabilities Mitigate Tradeoffs in Public Organisations. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(1), 25–43.; Gómez Sabaini, J.C.; Morán, D. (2020). Estrategias para abordar la evasión tributaria en América Latina y el Caribe: avances en su medición y panorama de las medidas recientes para reducir su magnitud. Santiago de Chile: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).; Gonzalez, R., Gasco, J., & Llopis, J. (2007). E-government success: some principles from a Spanish case study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(6), 845-861.; Goodhue, D., & Thompson, R. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quaterly, 19(2), 213–236.; Grimsley, M., & Meehan, A. (2007). e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 134-148.; Grover, V., Lyytinen, K., Srinivasan, A., & Tan, B. (2008). Contributing to Rigorous and Forward Thinking Explanatory Theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9, 40-47.; Gupta, K. P., Singh, S., & Bhaskar, P. (2016). Citizen Adoption of e-Government: A Literature Review and Conceptual Framework. Electronic Government, an International Journal 12(2), 160–85.; Gupta, M. P., & Jana, D. (2003). E-government evaluation: a framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 365–387.; Habermas, J. (1984). Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Volumen 1 y 2. . Boston, Massachussets: Beacon Press Books.; Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Hult, T., Danks, N., & Soumya, R. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A workbook. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.; Hefetz, A., & Warner, M. (2004). Privatization and its reverse: explaining the dynamics of the government contracting process. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 14(2), 171–190.; Henman, P. (2010). Governing Electronically: E-Government and the Reconfiguration of Public Administration, Policy and Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.; Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.; Hidayat Ur Rehman, I., Ali Turi, J., Rosak-Szyrocka, J., Alam, M., & Pilař, L. (2023). The role of awareness in appraising the success of E-government systems. Cogent Business & Management, 10, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2186739.; Hooda, A., Gupta, P., Jeyaraj, A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Clarifying the role of e-Government Trust in e-Government Success Models: A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 27, Doi: https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v27i0.4079.; Horan, T. A., Abhichandani, T., & Rayalu, R. (2006). Assessing user satisfaction of egovernment services: development and testing of quality-in-use satisfaction with advanced traveler information systems (ATIS). Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on the System Sciences (HICSS’06).; Hu, G., Lin, H., & Pan, W. (2013). Conceptualizing and Examining e-Government Service Capability: A Review and Empirical Study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(11), 2379-2395.; Huang, Z., & Benyoucef, M. (2014). Usability and Credibility of E-Government Websites. Government Information Quarterly, 584-595.; Ibbott, C. J., & O’Keefe, R. M. (2004). Trust, planning and benefits in a global interorganizational system. Information Systems Journal 14(2), 131–152.; Idoughi, D., & Abdelhakim, D. (2018). Developing Countries E-Government Services Evaluation Identifying and Testing Antecedents of Satisfaction Case of Algeria. International Journal Of Electronic Government Research, 14(1), 63-85.; International Telecommunication Union. (2024). Measuring digital development: The ICT Development Index 2024. Ginebra: ITU Publications.; İskender, G., & Özkan, S. (2015). Analysis of success factors in e-government transformation in Turkey: are these factors really the causes of success?. Information Development, 323-332.; Jaimes Martínez, C. P. (2020). ADOPCIÓN DE LA FACTURACIÓN ELECTRÓNICA Y SU INFLUENCIA EN LA ORGANIZACIÓN. CASO DE ESTUDIO: ENTIDAD DEL SECTOR AGROPECUARIO. Bogotá D.C., Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.; Jaimes Martínez, C. P., & Díaz Pínzón, B. H. (2022). Success evaluation model of E-government systems for tax administrations: Recognizing the public value from the taxpayer's perspective. 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). Madrid: IEEE. DOI:10.23919/CISTI54924.2022.9820607.; Jeyaraj, A. (2020). DeLone & McLean models of information system success: Critical metareview and research directions. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102139. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102139.; Jonker, J., & Pennink, B. (2010). Conceptual Models. En J. Jonker, & B. Pennink, The Essence of Research Methodology (págs. 43-63). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.; Jørgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values – an inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354-381.; Kaisara, G., & Pather, S. (2011). The e-Government evaluation challenge: A South African Batho Pele-aligned service quality approach. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 211-221.; Kaliannan, M., Raman, M., & Dorasamy, M. (2010). Citizens and E-Government: Evaluating Policy and Management. Capitulo: Assessing e-Government Services: The Case of e-Filing of Personal Income Tax in Malaysia. 317-333: IGI GLOBAL.; Keutel, M., Michalik, B., & Richter, J. (2014). Towards mindful case study research in IS: a critical analysis of the past ten years. European Journal of Information Systems, 23., 256–272.; Khatib, H., Lee, H., Suh, C., & Weerakkody, V. (2019). e-Government systems success and user acceptance in developing countries: The role of perceived support quality. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 29(1), 1-34.; Kilani, Y. M. (2021). The moderating role of innovation valance between adoption and actual use of e-government services: an extension of DeLone and McLean information success model. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, 26(3), 273-295.; Klamo, L., Huang, W., Wang, K., & Le, T. (2006). Successfully implementing e-government: Fundamental issues and a case study in the USA. Electronic Government, 3(2), 158-173.; Koh, C., & Prybutok, V. (2003). The three ring model and development of an instrument for measuring dimensions of e-government functions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 34-39.; Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. (2016). Sistemas de información gerencial. Décimocuarta edición. México: PEARSON EDUCACIÓN.; Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. New York: Guilford Publications.; Lee, B. B., Lee, E. H., & Lee, T. (2022). The effect of E-Government website evaluation on user satisfaction and intention to use: the mediating role of warmth and competence judgment on government. Information, Communication & Society, 26(9), 1868-1889. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2041701.; Lee, G. L., & Pai, J. (2005). Influence of environmental and organizational factors on the success of internet‐based interorganizational systems planning. Internet Research, 15(5), 527–543.; Lee, J. (2010). 10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 220-230.; Lucas, H. (1978). Empirical evidence for a descriptive model of implementation. MIS Quaterly, 2(2), 27–42.; MacLean, D., & Titah, R. (2021). A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research on the Impacts of e-Government: A Public Value Perspective. Public Administration Review 82(1), 23-38.; Madsen, C. Ø., & Kræmmergaard, P. (2015). Channel Choice: A Literature Review. Electronic Government. Proceedings of the 14th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference on Electronic Government (EGOV 2015). Thessaloniki, Grecia.; Maldonado, C. (2018). La incorporación de Tecnologías de Información y comunicación en organizaciones gubernamentales y la creación de valor. El caso de la Dirección Nacional de Migraciones (2007-2015). Buenos Aires: Universidad de San Andrés.; Malodia, S., Dhir, A., Mishra, M., & Bhatti, Z. (2021). Future of e-Government: An integrated conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 1-17.; Martínez-Salgado, C. (2012). El muestreo en investigación cualitativa. Principios básicos y algunas controversias. Ciênc. saúde coletiva, 17(3), 613-619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232012000300006.; Mellouli, M., Bouaziz, F., & Bentahar, O. (2020). E-government success assessment from a public value perspective. International Review of Public Administration, 25(3), 153-174. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2020.1799517.; Meneses, J., & Rodriguez, D. (2011). El cuestionario y la entrevista. Universidad Abierta de Cataluña.; Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public value inside: what is public value creation? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 192–219.; Mihuandayani, Utami, E., & Luthfi, E. T. (2018). Text mining based on tax comments as big data analysis using SVM and feature selection. International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT) (págs. 537–542). IEEE.; Miles, M., Huberman, A., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Londrés: Sage.; Mingers, J. (2003). The paucity of multimethod research: a review of the information. Info Systems, 233–249.; Mingers, J. (2004). Real-izing Information Systems: Critical Realism as an Underpinning Philosophy for Information Systems. Information & Organization, 145-153.; Mingers, J., & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega, 25(5), 489–509.; Mingers, J., Mutch, A., & Willcocks, L. (2013). Critical realism in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 795-802.; Moore, M. H. (1994). Public value as the focus of strategy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 53(3), 296-304.; Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value. Strategic Management in Government. USA: Harvard University Press.; Moore, M. H. (2014). Public Value Accounting: Establishing the Philosophical Basis. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 465–477.; Morales, V., & Bayona, S. (2019). Critical success factors in the development of e-government: A systematic review of the literature %7C [Factores Críticos de Éxito en el Desarrollo de E-Gobierno: Revisión Sistemática de la Literatura]. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao (E23), 233-247.; Morales, V., Bayona, S., & Morales, J. (2020). Categorization of critical success factors in the development of e-government %7C [Categorización de factores críticos de éxito en el desarrollo de e-gobierno]. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao, 590-602.; Müller, S. D., & Skau, S. A. (2015). Success factors influencing implementation of e-government at different stages of maturity: a literature review. Int. J. Electronic Governance, 7 (2), 136-170.; Nam, T. (2014). Determining the type of e-government use. . Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 211–220. Doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.09.006.; Nguyen, T. D., Nguyen, J. M., & Cao, T. H. (2015). Information Systems Success: A Literature Review. En Lecture Notes in Computer Science (págs. 242–256). DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-26135-5_18.; Nookhao, S. K. (2023). Achieving a successful e-government: Determinants of behavioral intention from Thai citizens’ perspective. Heliyon, 9(8).; Nusir, M., & Bell, D. (2013). Systematic Literature Review: Taxonomy of Services in e-Government. UK Academy for Information Systems Conference Proceedings 2013.; OECD. (2001). Understanding the Digital Divide. Paris: OECD Publishing. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/236405667766.; Orlikowski, W. (1992). The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 3(3), 398–427.; Ortiz-Rodríguez, F., Mishra Tiwari, S., Amara, F. Z., & Sahagun, M. (2023). E-Government Success: An End-User Perspective. En J. M. Medina-Quintero, & A. J. Sahagun M. A., Global Perspectives on the Strategic Role of Marketing Information Systems (págs. 168-186). IGI Global.; Owusu, A. (2023). Assessing the impact of e-government systems from citizens' perspective: evidence from Ghana. . Electronic Government, 19(3), 376-400. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2023.130583.; Owusu, A., Akpe-Doe, C., & Taana, I. (2022). Assessing the Effectiveness of E-Government Services in Ghana: A Case of the Registrar General's Department. . International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 18, 1-21.; Parada Corrales, J. (2004). Realismo crítico en investigación en ciencias sociales: una introducción. Investigación & Desarrollo, 12 (2), 396-429.; Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. En J. Dawson, F. A., & L. Sparks, The Retailing Reader (págs. 30-51). New York: Routledge.; Paré, G. (2004). Investigating information systems with positivist case study. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13(1), 233-264.; Parra Jiménez, O. D., & Patino Jacinto, R. A. (2010). Evasión de impuestos nacionales en Colombia: años 2001 - 2009. Revista Facultad De Ciencias Económicas, 18(2), 177-198.; Peña, J. I., Díaz, B. H., & Favier, M. (2010). Multiméthodologie dans la recherche en systèmes d’information. Deux exemples de recherche en cours en Colombie. París.; Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2012). The Past, Present, and Future of “IS Success.”. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(5), 341–362.; Petter, S., Delone, W., & Mclean, E. (2013). Information systems success: the quest for the independet variables. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 7-61.; Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.; Rahman, A. (2015). Toward a Comprehensive Conceptualization of Digital Divide and its Impact on E-Government System Success. En M. Quaddus, & A. G. Woodside, E-Services Adoption: Processes by Firms in Developing (págs. 291-488). Emerald Publishing Limited. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1069-096420150000023003.; Rainer, R., & Watson, H. (1995). The keys to executive information system success. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(2), 83–98.; Rana, N., Dwivedi, Y., Williams, M., & Weerakkody, V. (2015). Investigating success of an e-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(1), 127-142.; Reddick, G. (2004). Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers? Government Information Quarterly, (22), 38-57.; Rigdon, E. E., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2017). On Comparing Results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM : Five Perspectives and Five Recommendations. Marketing: ZFP – Journal of Research and Management, 39(3), 4–16.; Ringle, C., Wende, S., & Becker, J. (Accedido: 18 de noviembre de 2024). SmartPLS 4. Disponible en: https://www.smartpls.com/documentation.; Robbins, G., Mulligan, E., & Keenan, F. (2015). e-Government in the Irish Revenue: The Revenue On-Line Service (ROS): A success story? Financial Accountability and Management, 31(4), 363-394.; Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.; Ruel, E., Wagner, W. E., & Gilllespie, B. J. (2016). The practice of survey research: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.; Ruiz, M. A., Pardo, A., & San Martín, R. (2010). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 34-45.; Saunders, M. N. (2019). Capitulo 4: Understanding research philosophy and approaches ti theory development. En M. N. Saunders, P. Lewis, & A. Thornhill, Research methods for business students (págs. 128-171). Reino Unido: Pearson Education Limited.; Scott, M., DeLone, W., & Golden, W. (2016). Measuring eGovernment success: a public value approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 187-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.11.; Seddon, P. B. (1997). respecification and extension of the DeLone and Mc Lean model of IS success. Information systems research, 8(3), 240-253.; Sedera, D. (2006). Enterprise system success: a measurement model. Queensland, Australia: Queensland University of Technology.; Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. (2019). Evaluación de modelos predictivos en PLS-SEM: pautas para usar PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53 (11), 2322-2347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189.; Siddaway, A., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. (2019). How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Meta-syntheses. . Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747-770.; Singh, H., Grover, P., Kar, A., & Ilavarasan, V. (2020). Review of performance assessment frameworks of e-government projects. . Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(1), Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-02-2019-0011.; Soper, D. (11 de 21 de 2024). A-priori Sample Size Calculator for Structural Equation Models [Software]. . Obtenido de https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc; Sorongan, E., & Hidayati, Q. (2020). Integration of eucs variables into delone and mclean models for E-government evaluation: Conceptual models. Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 6(1), 32-42.; Stefanovic, D., Marjanovic, U., Delić, M., Culibrk, D., & Lalic, B. (2016). Assessing the success of e-government systems: An employee perspective. . Information & Management, 53(6), 717–726. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.02.007 .; Sterrenberg, G., & L'Espoir Decosta, P. (2023). Identifying the crucial factors of e-government success from the perspective of Australian citizens living with disability using a public value approach. Government Information Quarterly, 40 (3), 101813.; Sugumaran, V., & Arogyaswamy, B. (2003). Measuring it performance: “Contingency”. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(2), 79-86.; Teo, T. S., Srivastava, S. C., & Jiang, L. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99-131.; Teo, T., & Wong, P. (2005). Implementing electronic filing of tax returns: insights form. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application, 7(2), 3-16.; Thomas, P. (2006). Information systems success and technology acceptance within government organization. Association for Information Systems - 12th Americas Conference On Information Systems, (págs. 4404–4411).; Titah, R., & Barki, H. (2006). e-Government Adoption and Acceptance: A Literature Review. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 2(3), 23–57.; Torres, M., Vásquez, C., & Viloria, A. (2010). GESTIÓN Y CALIDAD DE LA INFORMACIÓN EN EL GOBIERNO ELECTRÓNICO. Universidad, Ciencia y Tecnología.; Twizeyimana, J., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36, 167–178.; United Nations. (2018). UNITED NATIONS E-GOVERNMENT SURVEY 2018. New York: United Nations.; United Nations E-government survey 2024. (2024). Nueva York: United Nations.; Van Maanen, J., Sørensen, J., & Mitchell, T. (2007). The interplay between theory and method. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1145-1154.; Veeramootoo, N., Nunkoo, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). What determines success of an e-government service? Validation of an integrative model of e-filing continuance usage. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 161–174. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.004.; Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.; Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.; Venkatesh, V., Sykes, T. A., & Venkatraman, S. (2014). Understanding e-Government portal use in rural India: role of demographic and personality characteristics. . Information Systems Journal, 24(3), 249–269. Doi:10.1111/isj.12008.; Verkijika, S., & De Wet, L. (2018). A usability assessment of e-government websites in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 20-29.; Vogt, W. P., Vogt, E. R., Gardner, D. C., & Haeffele, L. M. (2014). Selecting the right analyses. New York: Guilford.; Wakhu, S., He, J., & Xu, F. (2019). The 3D Integrated Model for E-Government Systems Success: A Case of the e-EIA System in Kenya. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARY ARCHIVES AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 29(1), 63-78.; Wang, Y. S., & Liao, Y. W. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone. Government Information Quarterly, 25(4), 717–733.; Westland, J. (2012). Erratum to ‘‘Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling’’. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications (10), 445; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2012.06.001.; Westland, J. C. (2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications (9), 476-487.; Will, D. J. (1981). Roy Bhaskar, A realist theory of science, Brighton, Sussex, Harvester Press, 1978, (1st ed., 1975), 8vo, pp. 284, £3.95 (paperback). - Roy Bhaskar, The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Medical History, 25(1), 91-92.; Wynn, D., & Williams, C. (2012). PRINCIPLES FOR CONDUCTING CRITICAL REALIST CASE STUDY RESEARCH IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 787-810.; Yin, R. (2003). Case Study Research, Design and Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.; https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/88224; Universidad Nacional de Colombia; Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia; https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/

  15. 15

    Alternate Title: Development of an editor for creating and editing PIOs (care information objects) for care transition.

    Source: GMS Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie. 2024, Vol. 20, p1-9. 9p.

    Geographic Terms: GERMANY

  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

    Alternate Title: Long-term hospitalized female patients in a psychiatric hospital and their discharge.

    Authors: Krystynová, Tereza1 krystynova3@centrum.cz

    Source: Ceská a Slovenská Psychiatrie. uno2025, Vol. 121 Issue 1, p29-37. 9p.

  19. 19

    Authors: Bhola, H. S.

    Source: International Review of Education / Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft / Revue Internationale de l'Education, 1992 Mar 01. 38(2), 103-115.

  20. 20