Suchergebnisse - "SCHOLARLY peer review"

Identity Theft in AI Conference Peer Review.

Autoren: Shah, Nihar B. Bok, Melisa Liu, Xukun et al.

Quelle: Communications of the ACM. Dec2025, Vol. 68 Issue 12, p32-34. 3p.

Schlagwörter: *SCHOLARLY peer review, *IDENTITY theft, *ARTIFICIAL intelligence, *CONFERENCES & conventions, IDENTIFICATION

Generative Artificial Intelligence Policies under the Microscope.

Autoren: Nahar, Mahjabin Lee, Sian Guillen, Rebekah et al.

Quelle: Communications of the ACM. Jul2025, Vol. 68 Issue 7, p29-33. 5p.

Schlagwörter: *SCHOLARLY peer review, GENERATIVE artificial intelligence, SCHOLARLY publishing, COMPUTER science conferences, ARTIFICIAL intelligence & ethics, GUIDELINES, ACADEMIC discourse, AUTHORSHIP

Constructive Peer Review Made Practical: A Guide to the EMPATHY Framework.

Autoren: Sridhar, Shrihari¹ (AUTHOR) ssridhar@mays.tamu.edu

Quelle: Journal of Marketing. May2025, Vol. 89 Issue 3, p1-12. 12p.

Schlagwörter: *SCHOLARLY peer review, *MARKETING, CONCEPTUAL models

Acts of Kindness in the Peer Review Process.

Autoren: Masiero, Silvia¹ (AUTHOR) silvima@ifi.uio.no

Quelle: Information Technology for Development. Oct2025, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p733-736. 4p.

Schlagwörter: *SCHOLARLY peer review, *GROUP work in research, KINDNESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL techniques, EDUCATION ethics, COMMUNICATION strategies

Isotonic mechanism for exponential family estimation in machine learning peer review.

Autoren: Yan, Yuling Su, Weijie J Fan, Jianqing

Quelle: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology). Nov2025, Vol. 87 Issue 5, p1422-1456. 35p.

Schlagwörter: *SCHOLARLY peer review, *UTILITY functions, *STATISTICAL reliability, MACHINE learning, RANKING (Statistics), EXPONENTIAL families (Statistics)

Why review papers get rejected: common pitfalls and how to avoid them.

Autoren: Kembro, Joakim Hans Kunisch, Sven Durach, Christian F.

Quelle: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 2025, Vol. 55 Issue 11, p163-192. 30p.

Schlagwörter: *PUBLISHING, *SCHOLARLY peer review, RESEARCH methodology, ORIGINALITY, PERIODICAL articles

Tactical Refereeing and Signaling by Publishing.

Autoren: Popov, Sergey V.¹ (AUTHOR) popovs@cardiff.ac.uk

Quelle: Kyklos. Oct2025, p1. 11p. 2 Illustrations.

Schlagwörter: *SCHOLARLY peer review, *DECISION making, *RESOURCE allocation, SIGNALS & signaling, INFORMATION commons, STATISTICAL bias

On and off-the-record correction practices: A survey-based study of how chemistry researchers react to errors.

Autoren: Bordignon, Frédérique^1,2 (AUTHOR) frederique.bordignon@enpc.fr

Quelle: Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality Assurance. Oct2025, p1-14. 14p. 7 Illustrations.

Schlagwörter: *SCHOLARLY peer review, *QUESTIONNAIRES, SCIENCE publishing, INSTITUTIONAL repositories, RESEARCH personnel, SCIENTIFIC method

Making it work better: improving the review process experience.

Autoren: Rapp, Adam Chaker, Nawar N.

Quelle: Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management. Dec2024, Vol. 44 Issue 4, p335-342. 8p.

Schlagwörter: *SCHOLARLY peer review, *CAREER development, SCIENTIFIC knowledge, ANONYMOUS authors, REVISION (Writing process), PEER review of students, ACTIVE learning, MINORS

More Than Yea or Nay?: Accountability of Peers in Promotion and Tenure.

Autoren: Jones, Phillip J. McAllister III, James T.

Quelle: Journal of Library Administration. Jan2025, Vol. 65 Issue 1, p58-78. 21p.

Schlagwörter: *Scholarly peer review, *Librarians, *Librarians' attitudes, Coworker relationships, Best practices, Attitude (Psychology)

"It's like some weird AI ouroboros": Artificial Intelligence Use and Avoidance in Scholarly Peer Review.

Autoren: Poole, Alex H. Todd‐Diaz, Ashley

Quelle: Proceedings of the Association for Information Science & Technology. Oct2025, Vol. 62 Issue 1, p521-532. 12p.

Schlagwörter: *Scholarly peer review, *Artificial intelligence, *Telecommunication systems, Generative artificial intelligence, Moral attitudes

The Six Dimensions of Strong Theory.

Autoren: Carton, Andrew M.¹ (AUTHOR) carton@wharton.upenn.edu

Quelle: Organization Science. Jul/Aug2025, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p1242-1270. 29p.

Schlagwörter: *ORGANIZATIONAL research, *SCHOLARLY peer review, PERIODICAL articles, QUALITY (Philosophy), THEORISTS

What meta‐research has taught us about research and changes to research practices.

Autoren: Ioannidis, John P. A.¹ (AUTHOR) jioannid@stanford.edu

Quelle: Journal of Economic Surveys. Sep2025, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p1823-1834. 12p.

Schlagwörter: *SCHOLARLY peer review, *DISCLOSURE, STATISTICAL bias, SCIENTIFIC method, SCIENTIFIC observation, RESEARCH protocols, RESEARCH evaluation

Peer reviewer fatigue, or peer reviewer refusal?

Autoren: Beecher, Kate Wang, Joshua

Quelle: Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality Assurance. Jul2025, Vol. 32 Issue 5, p838-844. 7p.

Schlagwörter: *SCHOLARLY peer review, SCHOLARLY publishing, ACQUISITION of manuscripts, SOCIAL movements, PEER teaching

Editorial Policy.

Quelle: Journal of the American Taxation Association. Fall2025, Vol. 47 Issue 2, p137-141. 5p.

Schlagwörter: *CONFLICT of interests, *SCHOLARLY peer review, *DOCUMENTATION standards, *PUBLISHING, CODES of ethics

A Word of Thanks.

Quelle: Journal of Consumer Research. Apr2025, Vol. 51 Issue 6, p1071-1072. 2p.

Schlagwörter: *SCHOLARLY peer review

EDITOR'S COMMENTS: Community Building through Virtuous Reviewing.

Autoren: Brown, Sue (AUTHOR)

Quelle: MIS Quarterly. Jun2024, Vol. 48 Issue 2, piii-viii. 6p.

Schlagwörter: *SCHOLARLY peer review, *TIME management, *EDITORS, INTEGRITY

Reviews & Products: MIS Quarterly (Periodical)

Reviewer Acknowledgments.

Quelle: Review of Educational Research. Dec2025, Vol. 95 Issue 6, p1450-1464. 15p.

Schlagwörter: *PROFESSIONAL peer review, *SCHOLARLY peer review, *EDUCATIONAL cooperation, *GRATITUDE, *SCHOLARLY publishing, *EDUCATION research

Exploring reviewer self-assessment in the context of academic peer review.

Autoren: Sizo, Amanda Oliveira, Alexandra Lino, Adriano et al.

Quelle: Scientific Reports. 11/4/2025, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p1-9. 9p.

Schlagwörter: *SCHOLARLY peer review, *EDUCATION & training services industry, *EDITORIAL policies, *QUANTITATIVE research, *CONFERENCES & conventions, *SCHOLARLY periodicals

AI and peer reviews in higher education: students' multimodal views on benefits, differences and limitations.

Autoren: Zapata, Gabriela C. Cope, Bill Kalantzis, Mary et al.

Quelle: Technology, Pedagogy & Education. Nov2025, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p583-601. 19p.

Schlagwörter: *Artificial intelligence, *Scholarly peer review, *Learning, Peer review of students, Generative artificial intelligence, Student attitudes, Education research, Higher education