Suchergebnisse - "Jones A"

Meet the authors: Katerina Jones, Camila Bernardo de Brito, and Mariana Xavier Byndloss

Autoren: Katerina Jones Camila Bernardo de Brito Mariana Xavier Byndloss

Quelle: Cell Chemical Biology. 32:3-4

From illustrating poems to creating a picture book: Creative collaborations with Italian author Anna Travagliati, Italian artist Serena Della Bona and US translator and editor Bristin Scalzo Jones

Autoren: Anna Travagliati

Quelle: Book 2.0. 13:51-74

Schlagwörter: 0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences

Meet the authors: Kieran O’Neill, Erin Pleasance, and Steven Jones

Autoren: Kieran O’Neill Erin Pleasance Steven J.M. Jones

Quelle: Cell Genomics, Vol 4, Iss 11, Pp 100696- (2024)

Schlagwörter: Genetics, QH426-470, Internal medicine, RC31-1245

Dateibeschreibung: electronic resource

Relation: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666979X24003252; https://doaj.org/toc/2666-979X

Zugangs-URL: https://doaj.org/article/b2b8c355f6c34bdb938519cd3ca9ee30

‘Working together accomplishes much more’: a conversation with Dr Patricia Romney, author of We Were There: the Third World Women's Alliance & the Second Wave

Autoren: Paulina Jones-Torregrosa Patricia Romney

Quelle: Feminist Theory. 26:775-783

Mechanical Thrombectomy Access in Africa: A Mission Thrombectomy Study Subanalysis.

Autoren: Alejo, Gabriela Prasad, Sidarrth Otite, Fadar Oliver et al.

Quelle: Stroke (00392499); May2025, Vol. 56 Issue 5, pe130-e132, 3p

Jones, Barbara Mildred (1912–1978), painter, author, and curator

Autoren: Jen Grasso

Quelle: Oxford Dictionary of National Biography ISBN: 9780198614128

The authors reply

Autoren: Mahmood K. Razavi Saravanan Balamuthusamy Angelo N. Makris et al.

Quelle: Kidney International. 108:497-499

Author Correction: Cortical microstructural abnormalities in dementia with Lewy bodies and their associations with Alzheimer’s disease copathologies

Autoren: Elijah Mak Robert I. Reid Scott A. Przybelski et al.

Quelle: NPJ Parkinsons Dis

Schlagwörter: Author Correction

Health Status Outcomes With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in ISCHEMIA.

Autoren: Huded, Chetan P. Spertus, John A. Jones, Philip G. et al.

Quelle: Circulation; 9/23/2025, Vol. 152 Issue 12, p846-858, 13p

A Conversation Between Sandra Tanner and Ronald V. Huggins, Author of Signature Books’ Lighthouse : Jerald and Sandra Tanner, Beloved and Despised Critics of Mormonism (2022)

Autoren: Tanner, Sandra Huggins, Ronald V. Brown, Barbara Jones

Quelle: The John Whitmer Historical Association Journal, 2023 Apr 01. 43(1), 232-244.

Zugangs-URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27241044

THE AUTHOR OF THE "AGAINST HIEROCLES": A RESPONSE TO BORZÌ AND JONES

Autoren: Johnson, Aaron P.

Quelle: The Journal of Theological Studies, 2013 Oct 01. 64(2), 574-594.

Zugangs-URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jts/flt129

Stages of development of linguistics and linguistic schools: 102 STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT OF LINGUISTICS AND LINGUISTIC SCHOOLS D.I. Inomiddinova (NamECI) Аннотация. В работе проекта рассматривается актуальная проблема преподавания английского языка как иностранного студентам нефилологических вузов. Представлен вариант практической реализации основных компонентов методической системы в учебном комплексе упражнений и заданий, позволяющий наметить новые и эффективные методы обучения иностранным языкам. Данная работа будет интересна и полезна учителям иностранных языков и другим категориям специалистов, профессионально занимающихся исследованием и применением новых методов в обучении языкам. Аннотация. Илмий мақола филологиядан ташқари университетлар талабалари учун инглиз тилини чет тили сифатида ўқитишнинг долзарб муаммосига бағишланган. Чет тилларини ўқитишда янги ва самарали усулларни белгилаш имконини берувчи машғулотлар ва топшириқлар мажмуасида услубий тизимнинг асосий таркибий қисмларини амалий тадбиқ қилиш варианти келтирилган. Ушбу мақола чет тили ўқитувчилари ва бошқа тоифадаги мутахассислар учун тадқиқот ва тилларни ўқитишда янги усулларни қўллаш билан шуғулланадиган мутахассислар учун қизиқарли ва фойдали бўлади. In its development, linguistics went through two stages: a) pre-scientific (approximately from the 4th century BC to the 18th century), when linguistics was not yet recognized as an independent science and existed within the framework of philology; b) the scientific stage that began in the 19th century, when linguistics became an independent science, with its own subject, different from the subjects of other sciences. 1) Formation and development of philology. Philological knowledge as a separate type of activity and professional occupation developed in the Hellenistic era, by the end of the 4th century. BC e. By this time, the highest point of the rise of Greek culture (5th century BC, the so-called "Greek miracle", the "golden age" of ancient Greek literature, philosophy, art) was already behind, and new generations were forced to live mainly by the great cultural heritage of the past. One of the most influential centers that concentrated the collection and study of monuments of ancient Greek writing was Alexandria in Egypt. One of the largest libraries of the ancient world was formed here, numbering up to half a million books and manuscripts. In the purely practical environment of working on the manuscripts of the Alexandrian library over several generations, a rich, brilliant philological tradition was created among the Alexandrian librarians. Many of its representatives managed to become widely famous even during their lifetime for their enormous scholarship, the art of handling manuscripts, and the authority of the commentary. These are the names of figures III – II centuries. BC e. Callimachus, Zenodotus, Eratosthenes the Philologist (this is how he called himself, wanting to emphasize his glory as an extraordinary scholar), Aristophanes the Byzantine, Aristarchus of Samothrace, whose activity (222 – 150 BC) is the time of the highest flowering of the Alexandrian philology, etc. The literal Latin translation is litterae, which means letters, and hence the written word, writing, literature. One of the definitions of grammar that has come down to us and, apparently, widely known in its time, belongs to Dionysius the Thracian (c. 170 – 90 BC); 103 he understands by "grammatical art" "awareness in most of what is said in poets and prose writers." The very content of grammatical art, according to the same definition, consisted of four parts or “skills”: a) reading – the ability to read a work in accordance with the rules of prosody, expressiveness; b) correction – the ability to correct errors in the text of the work; c) interpretation – the ability to explain everything in it that requires commentary; d) judicium, judgment – the ability to give it a proper aesthetic assessment, of course, according to the canons of that time. To fulfill these duties, the grammarian had the appropriate tools -: a) knowledge of the language, b) metrics and c) realities (ie, the things themselves, corresponding to the words used in the manuscript). As you can see, this is still a very broad understanding of grammar, but gradually a narrower one is taking shape within its framework, interpreting grammar as “the art of reading and writing correctly”. In the first Alexandrian "grammars" three sections are already clearly distinguished: a) the doctrine of "letters", or sounds (since "sound" and "letter" were not yet clearly distinguished, these were the rules for "reading" manuscripts); b) the doctrine of words, or "parts of speech"; c) the doctrine of the "composition of words." These three parts correspond to phonetics, morphology and syntax in modern grammars. These ideas from Alexandria and other Hellenistic centers were transferred to Rome (the original planter of philology in Rome was Crates of Mallos); it subtly continued to live during the Middle Ages in the centers of monastic culture, took on a new life after the Renaissance, and was finally transmitted to the new time in the form of a powerful tradition of classical philology, that is, a philology turned to the monuments of Greece and Rome. 2) In the Renaissance, the process of decomposition of philology begins. This was due to a number of circumstances. Firstly, with the development of trade and navigation, with the great geographical discoveries, many new languages \u200b\u200bthat differ significantly from the classical languages \u200b\u200b(Greek and Latin) come to the attention of Europeans; the need to study these new languages required other techniques and skills, different from those that were formed within the framework of classical philology; this contributed to the gradual isolation of grammar from other branches of philological knowledge. Secondly, with the end of the era of feudal fragmentation and isolation, with the creation of centralized states, Europeans are forming a national identity, growing interest in their own national languages and cultures. As a result, “national philologies” arise, which differ in some way from classical (Greco-Roman) philology both in terms of tasks and, in part, in terms of methods. Many European languages (for example, Germanic, Slavic) differed significantly from Latin, and therefore required different approaches to their study. Thirdly, the stock of all kinds of materials and information, accumulated with the progress of philology, became so large that it inevitably caused the differentiation of labor. More and more difficult was to become the task of explaining the monument in all respects at once, and, moreover, a monument of any character. On this basis, the division of the former type of education, that is, education of a general encyclopedic character, into separate special areas arose. So, some philologists dealt mainly with poetic texts, others with prose texts, some with handwritten texts, others with inscriptions printed on a hard surface; Some philologists specialized in processing monuments from the side of language or metrics, others – from the side of realities, etc. And since philology has always dealt with monuments of the past, i.e. with material of a historical nature, then next to philology, the science of history arose, turned not so much to monuments, but directly to reality itself: for the historian, a monument becomes not an end, but a means, a source of knowledge of the past. All taken together was the cause of a deep crisis in the ancient philological tradition, which had a particularly strong effect in the first half of the 19th century, but was gradually brewing even earlier. 104 3) Separation of linguistics into an independent science. However, a real revolution in linguistics was caused by the discovery of Sanskrit (an ancient Indian language) at the end of the 18th century. The English researcher William Jones (1746-1794), having studied ancient Indian manuscripts, came to the conclusion that Sanskrit is related to Greek, Latin, and other European languages. He made the assumption that all these languages go back to one common non-preserved ancestor language, which was later called the Proto-Indo-European language. The works of Rasmus Rask (Denmark), Franz Bopp, Jacob Gimm (Germany), A. Kh. Vostokov (Russia) and others laid the foundation for the first scientific method of linguistics – the comparative historical method. It turned out that the Greek and Latin languages are, in essence, only two separate islands in the vast archipelago of the Indo-European linguistic world, moreover, significantly inferior to Sanskrit in their significance for the purposes of the reconstruction of the Indo-European language, which became the main goal of the new science. Representatives of classical philology, a new direction in the study of language, the so- called comparative (or comparative-historical) linguistics, was met for the most part either with hostility or with bewilderment. In turn, comparative-historical linguistics was also characterized by the desire to start off sharply from the ancient philological tradition of studying the language, to break completely with it, which was quite natural, since this tradition prevented the new science from gaining an independent position. Indicative in this regard are the arguments about the relationship between linguistics and philology, the largest representative of comparative historical linguistics of the 19th century. August Schleicher. The object of philology, according to Schleicher, is the spiritual life of peoples, as it is presented in the texts, and the object of linguistics is only language. For linguistics, it does not matter how significant in spirit the people speaking a given language are, whether the people have history, literature, or whether they never had a written language. Literature is important for linguistics only as a convenient auxiliary material for understanding languages, and above all because it is possible to extract from it information about past linguistic epochs, about former linguistic forms. In linguistics, language is an end in itself; in philology, language serves as a means. Linguist – naturalist. He is to languages what, for example, a botanist is to plants. The botanist must consider all plant organisms, he must study the laws of their structure, the laws of development. As for the use of vegetation, whether these plants are of value from a practical and aesthetic point of view, or are deprived of it, is a matter of indifference to the botanist. The most beautiful rose attracts the attention of a botanist as much as some nondescript weed. A philologist is like a gardener. He breeds only certain plants that are of importance to humans. For him, the practical value of the plant, the beauty of its form, color, aroma, etc., is most important. A plant that is good for nothing will not attract the attention of the gardener, and such plants as weeds even cause his dislike, regardless whether they are important representatives of plant forms or not. But the new science did not appear in place of the old one, since traditional philological studies on the language and style of individual authors, genres of writing, etc. with its development did not stop, and the practical need for such studies did not cease to exist. However, over time, the “classics” were forced to take part in the new scientific movement with their own, already linguistically proper, works on Greek and Latin. Linguistics here owed much to Georg Curtius (1820-1885), who recognized comparative linguistics as one of the first representatives of classical philology and provided fundamental samples of proper linguistic work on the Greek language (cf. his speech “Philologie und Sprachwissenschaft”, 1861). Thus, the successes of comparative linguistics were applied with great benefit to philological work on texts. 4) Saussurianism and structuralism. At the turn of the XIX-XX centuries. in linguistics, a number of scientific schools appear, a common feature of which is militant anti-philologism. Particularly characteristic in this respect are the linguistic views of 105 Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913), the founder of the Geneva School. In his "Course of General Linguistics" he formulates the task of linguistics: "The only and true subject of linguistics is language considered in and for itself." Saussure belittles the importance of comparative historical linguistics, since, in his opinion, it does not study language as a system, but only disparate changes. Further, he argues that for a linguist there is no need to study the history of the people who speak the language, its literature, culture: “Generally speaking, there is no need to know the conditions in which this or that language developed. With regard to some dialects, such as the Avestan language (Zend) and Old Slavonic, it is not even known exactly which peoples spoke them, but this ignorance does not in the least prevent us from studying them from the inside. "Linguist" is again opposed to "philologist". Saussure became the forerunner and spiritual father of a powerful trend in linguistics of the twentieth century. – structuralism, which proclaimed the study of language as an immanent (self-sufficient, independent) system of signs as the main goal of linguistics. Ultimately, this approach to language led to the dehumanization of linguistics. 5) Prerequisites for a new synthesis of linguistics and philology. From the middle and second half of the twentieth century. both linguists and literary critics have been actively talking about the need for a new integration of sciences. It became clear that language cannot be studied in isolation from other cultural and social phenomena: such a study will inevitably be incomplete and distort our ideas about language. Language can and should be studied not only in general, strictly grammatically, but also in the specific conditions of its historical existence and development. And as soon as this question is raised about the specific historical conditions of the life of a language, the question of the connection between the language and the areas of culture closest to it inevitably arises. Language then appears to the gaze of the researcher not only as an immanent system of signs serving the needs of thinking and social communication, but as one or another set of speech acts, texts of different genres and styles, that is, practical applications of this system that arise in a certain human environment, in a certain time, for the sake of specific practical interests – everyday, literary, artistic, etc. There is a need to study the language in the specific cultural and historical conditions of its growth and development. REFERENCES: 1. Brown H. 2000. Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc 2. Penny Ur. 1999. A course of language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3. Thornbury Scott. 2006. How to Teach Grammar. England: Pearson Education Limited. 4. Vagramova, Ya. V. Linguistic personality from the standpoint of the theory of bilingualism / N. V. Vagramova // Formation of a bilingual personality based on a competency-based approach / ed. G. A. Baeva. – St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg. un-ta, 2012. – S. 5-20. 5. V. M. Filatov [and others]; under. ed. V. M. Filatova. – Rostov n / a : Phoenix, 2004. Methods of teaching foreign languages in elementary and basic general education schools: 6. https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Linguistic-Stereotypes-F3HHCFYVC 7. http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Huang-RolePlay.html 8. http: // iteslj.org/Technique/Kodotchigova-RolePlay.html

Autoren: D Inomiddinova

Quelle: Zamonaviy lingvistik tadqiqotlar: xorijiy tajribalar, istiqbolli izlanishlar va tillarni o‘qitishning innovatsion usullari. :102-105

If history is written by the victors, who describes the spiders? Species author trends reflect gender and geopolitical disparities in biodiversity science

Autoren: Katherine O Montana Jacob A Gorneau J Stephen Gosnell et al.

Quelle: Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 146

Author Correction: Operando TEM study of a working copper catalyst during ethylene oxidation

Autoren: Wenqian Yu Shengnan Yue Minghe Yang et al.

Quelle: Nat Commun
Nature Communications, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1-1 (2025)

Schlagwörter: Science, Author Correction

Zugangs-URL: https://doaj.org/article/df6375b8298c4acd87a4d036c04bf30a

Authors and Artemus Jones: Libel Reform in England, 1910–52

Autoren: Christopher Hilliard

Quelle: Literature & History. 30:62-76

Schlagwörter: 05 social sciences, 0601 history and archaeology, 06 humanities and the arts, 16. Peace & justice, 0505 law

Zugangs-URL: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7919558
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03061973211007357

Author Correction: Genetic regulation of TERT splicing affects cancer risk by altering cellular longevity and replicative potential

Autoren: Oscar Florez-Vargas Michelle Ho Maxwell H. Hogshead et al.

Quelle: Nature Communications. 16

Author Correction: The impact of the initial COVID-19 outbreak on young adults’ mental health: a longitudinal study of risk and resilience factors

Autoren: Anna Wiedemann Jan Stochl Sharon A. S. Neufeld et al.

Quelle: Sci Rep
Scientific Reports, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 1-2 (2025)

Schlagwörter: Science, Medicine, Author Correction

Zugangs-URL: https://doaj.org/article/71957e9b81c542f0abb833c6b415778c

Author response for 'Novel Pathogenic Variant Confirms the Association of REST and Jones Syndrome'

Autoren: null Lodato, Valentina null Galli, Massimo null D'Angeli, Giacomo et al.

Authors’ Response to the Peer Review of 'Estimating Variance of Log Standardized Incidence Ratios Assessing Health Care Providers’ Performance: Comparative Analysis Using Bayesian, Bootstrap, and Delta Method Approaches'

Autoren: Solomon Woldeyohannes Yomei Jones Paul Lawton

Quelle: JMIRx Med, Vol 6, Pp e83796-e83796 (2025)

Schlagwörter: Medicine

Dateibeschreibung: electronic resource

Relation: https://xmed.jmir.org/2025/1/e83796; https://doaj.org/toc/2563-6316

Zugangs-URL: https://doaj.org/article/db3456251bae4f8e9ca62d0300aff84f

Author Correction: A shared spatial topography links the functional connectome correlates of cocaine use disorder and dopamine D2/3 receptor densities

Autoren: Jocelyn A. Ricard Loïc Labache Ashlea Segal et al.

Quelle: Commun Biol
Communications Biology, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-1 (2025)

Schlagwörter: QH301-705.5, Biology (General), Author Correction

Zugangs-URL: https://doaj.org/article/d2ee4b2a951642b88797141d2664460b