Suchergebnisse - "Earp, Brian D."

Authorship Without Writing: Large Language Models and the 'Senior Author' Analogy

Autoren: Hurshman, Clint Mann, Sebastian Porsdam Savulescu, Julian et al.

Schlagwörter: FOS: Computer and information sciences, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Artificial Intelligence, Computers and Society (cs.CY), Computation and Language, Computers and Society, Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Zugangs-URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.05390

Author Correction: How social relationships shape moral wrongness judgments

Autoren: Earp, Brian D. McLoughlin, Killian L. Monrad, Joshua T. et al.

Quelle: Nature Communications ; volume 15, issue 1 ; ISSN 2041-1723

Verfügbarkeit: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52274-w
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-52274-w.pdf
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-52274-w

Clarifying our editorial approach, with some important updates for authors and reviewers

Autoren: Earp, Brian D Shahvisi, Arianne Frith, Lucy

Quelle: Earp, B D, Shahvisi, A & Frith, L 2025, 'Clarifying our editorial approach, with some important updates for authors and reviewers', Journal of Medical Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2025-111363

Verfügbarkeit: https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/22ffd4aa-23ad-49d5-872e-725811dc650a
https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2025-111363

Correction to: Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy.

Autoren: Cova, Florian Strickland, Brent Abatista, Angela et al.

Quelle: Review of Philosophy & Psychology; Dec2021, Vol. 12 Issue 4, p999-1003, 5p

About the Authors

Autoren: Earp, Brian D. Savulescu, Julian

Quelle: Love is the Drug ; ISBN 9781526150851

Verfügbarkeit: https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526150851.00021
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.7765/9781526150851.00021/xml
https://www.manchesterhive.com/view/9781526150851/9781526150851.00021.xml
https://www.manchesterhive.com/downloadpdf/9781526150851/9781526150851.xml
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.7765/9781526150851.00021/pdf

Author Correction: How social relationships shape moral wrongness judgments

Autoren: Earp, Brian D. McLoughlin, Killian L. Monrad, Joshua T. et al.

Quelle: Nature Communications ; volume 12, issue 1 ; ISSN 2041-1723

Verfügbarkeit: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26493-4
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26493-4.pdf
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26493-4

Digital Life Models and the Genomic Knowledge Paradox: A Proposal for AI-Assisted Reflection in Genetic Decision-Making.

Autoren: Ong, Serene Porsdam Mann, Sebastian Voinea, Cristina et al.

Quelle: American Journal of Bioethics; Dec2025, Vol. 25 Issue 12, p95-99, 5p

Schlagwörter: GENOMICS, DIGITAL health, ARTIFICIAL intelligence, DECISION making, ETHICS, MATHEMATICAL models, THEORY of knowledge, COUNSELING, THEORY, GENETIC mutation, GENETIC testing

Experimental Bioethics, Linguistic Pragmatism, and Public Attitudes Toward Brain Organoids Research.

Autoren: Feroz, Faisal Lewis, Jonathan Earp, Brian D.

Quelle: American Journal of Bioethics; Apr2025, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p71-74, 4p

Schlagwörter: BRAIN physiology, LANGUAGE & languages, BIOETHICS, PUBLIC opinion, ETHICS, MEDICAL research

Guidelines for ethical use and acknowledgement of large language models in academic writing.

Autoren: Porsdam Mann, Sebastian Vazirani, Anuraag A. Aboy, Mateo et al.

Quelle: Nature Machine Intelligence; Nov2024, Vol. 6 Issue 11, p1272-1274, 3p

The Hopkins-Oxford Psychedelics Ethics (HOPE) Working Group Consensus Statement.

Autoren: Jacobs, Edward Earp, Brian D. Appelbaum, Paul S. et al.

Quelle: American Journal of Bioethics; Jul2024, Vol. 24 Issue 7, p6-12, 7p

Schlagwörter: CONSENSUS (Social sciences), MEDICAL protocols, HISTORY, POLICY sciences, SOCIAL justice, RECREATION, DIVERSITY & inclusion policies, CULTURE, HALLUCINOGENIC drugs, COMMUNITIES, ETHICS, HARM reduction, THERAPEUTIC touch, INFORMATION needs, RESEARCH methodology, SPIRITUALITY, INFORMED consent (Medical law), PROFESSIONAL licenses, PRACTICAL politics, WELL-being

“Let’s Build It and Find Out!” Next Steps for Personalized Patient Preference Prediction.

Autoren: Earp, Brian D. Porsdam Mann, Sebastian van Veenendaal, Tessa et al.

Quelle: American Journal of Bioethics. Nov2025, p1-6. 6p.

Schlagwörter: *MEDICAL decision making, *PATIENT preferences, *ETHICAL problems, *LANGUAGE models, *INFORMED consent (Law), *PATIENT autonomy, *STAKEHOLDER analysis

Digitally enabled patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care - Authors' reply

Autoren: Heathcote, Lauren C Goldberg, Daniel S Eccleston, Christopher et al.

Quelle: Heathcote , L C , Goldberg , D S , Eccleston , C , Spunt , S L , Simons , L E , Sharpe , L & Earp , B D 2019 , ' Digitally enabled patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care - Authors' reply ' , The Lancet. Oncology , vol. 20 , no. 1 , pp. e3 . https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30910-0

Schlagwörter: Decision Making, Shared, Humans, Neoplasms, Patient Reported Outcome Measures

Verfügbarkeit: https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/a2af37ac-0689-4b43-9112-fa50430de3c1
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30910-0

Generative AI entails a credit–blame asymmetry.

Autoren: Porsdam Mann, Sebastian Earp, Brian D. Nyholm, Sven et al.

Quelle: Nature Machine Intelligence; May2023, Vol. 5 Issue 5, p472-475, 4p

AUTOGEN and the Ethics of Co-Creation with Personalized LLMs—Reply to the Commentaries.

Autoren: Porsdam Mann, Sebastian Earp, Brian D. Møller, Nikolaj et al.

Quelle: American Journal of Bioethics; Mar2024, Vol. 24 Issue 3, pW6-W14, 9p

Schlagwörter: PUBLISHING, PLAGIARISM, NATURAL language processing, SCHOLARLY communication, ARTIFICIAL intelligence, MACHINE learning, ACADEMIC achievement, COPYRIGHT, PHILOSOPHY of education, AUTOMATION, WRITTEN communication, BIOETHICS, AUTHORSHIP

Proposal of a Selection Protocol for Replication of Studies in Sports and Exercise Science.

Autoren: Murphy, Jennifer Mesquida, Cristian Caldwell, Aaron R. et al.

Quelle: Sports Medicine; Jan2023, Vol. 53 Issue 1, p281-291, 11p

Schlagwörter: RESEARCH protocols, SPORTS sciences, EXERCISE physiology, REPLICATION (Experimental design), RESEARCH funding

What counts as mutilation—and who should decide? Disrupting dominant discourses on genital cutting and modification.

Autoren: Earp, Brian D. Abdulcadir, Jasmine Shahvisi, Arianne

Quelle: Culture, Health & Sexuality; May2025, Vol. 27 Issue 5, p511-519, 9p

Schlagwörter: GENDER affirmation surgery, FEMALE genital mutilation, PEOPLE of color, GENDER, RITES & ceremonies, FEMALE condoms, CONDOMS

Credit and blame for AI–generated content: Effects of personalization in four countries.

Autoren: Earp, Brian D. Porsdam Mann, Sebastian Liu, Peng et al.

Quelle: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences; Dec2024, Vol. 1542 Issue 1, p51-57, 7p

Schlagwörter: GENERATIVE artificial intelligence, LANGUAGE models, CHINESE people, RESPONSIBILITY, PRODUCTION standards

Digital Duplicates, Relational Scarcity, and Value: Commentary on Danaher and Nyholm (2024)

Autoren: Voinea, Cristina Mann, Sebastian Porsdam Register, Christopher et al.

Quelle: Philosophy & Technology; Dec2024, Vol. 37 Issue 4, p1-8, 8p

Moral Attitudes Toward Pharmacologically Assisted Couples Therapy: An Experimental Bioethics Study of Real-World "Love Drugs".

Autoren: Buyukbabani, Mey Bahar Earp, Brian D. Hannikainen, Ivar et al.

Quelle: AJOB Neuroscience; Oct-Dec2024, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p239-243, 5p

Schlagwörter: PSYCHOTHERAPY, MEDICAL prescriptions, COUPLES therapy, ETHICS, LOVE, INTERPERSONAL relations

AUTOGEN: A Personalized Large Language Model for Academic Enhancement—Ethics and Proof of Principle.

Autoren: Porsdam Mann, Sebastian Earp, Brian D. Møller, Nikolaj et al.

Quelle: American Journal of Bioethics; Oct2023, Vol. 23 Issue 10, p28-41, 14p, 3 Black and White Photographs, 1 Chart

Schlagwörter: PUBLISHING, LABOR productivity, NATURAL language processing, ARTIFICIAL intelligence, ACADEMIC achievement, PHILOSOPHY of education, AUTOMATION, AUTHORSHIP