Suchergebnisse - "Decision Making/ethics"

The Decisional System

Autoren: García Pedraza, Rubén

Schlagwörter: Artificial intelligence, Intelligence Tests/history, Decision-support system, Global Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Decision-Making/methods, Artificial Intelligence/economics, Decision, Decision Making, Clinical Decision-Making, Intelligence, Artificial Decisional System, Artificial Intelligence/standards, Decision Making/ethics, Emotional Intelligence/genetics, Decision Support Techniques, Business intelligence, Decision Theory, Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Decision Rules, Clinical Decision-Making/ethics, Decision making support, Artificial Intelligence/trends, Decision Making, Organizational, Emotional Intelligence/ethics, Emotional Intelligence, Computational intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Decision process, Specific Operations, Intelligence/classification, Emotional Intelligence/physiology, Decision Trees, Intelligence/physiology, Emotional Intelligence/classification, Decision Making/physiology, Specific Artificial Intelligence, Decision Making/radiation effects, Decision Support Systems, Management, Decision Making, Shared, Interim decision

Examples of Thinking in Horses Learning to Think

Autoren: Molchanova, Olena

Schlagwörter: Social Cognition, cognition, Active learning, comparative cognition, Learning/ethics, Intelligence, Decision, Decision Making/ethics, Horse, Test animal, Choice Behavior, Thinking, Machine Learning, Thinking/ethics, Cognition, Animal Rights, Reinforcement learning, animal, Learning/classification, Cognition/physiology, Emotional Intelligence, learning, Behavior, Animal, Learning Disabilities, communication, Communication, Multitasking Behavior, Verbal Learning, intelligence, horse training, emergent cognition, equine behavior, cognitive behavior, Reading Frames/ethics, learning to think, Thinking/physiology, Behavior Control, symbolic communication, Ambient Intelligence, Cognition/ethics, Decision Making, Spatial Learning, Horses/classification, Horses/growth & development, Animal Welfare, decision, Thinking/classification, Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms, Deep Learning, Decision Theory, Artificial Intelligence, thinking, Learning, Horses, Nonverbal Communication, Maze Learning, Social Behavior, Horses/psychology, Emotional Intelligence/ethics, Behavior, horse cognition, Animal, behavior, Intelligence/classification, Association Learning, Deep learning, Learning/physiology, decision-making, Social Learning, Transfer learning, Animal Communication, animal intelligence, Cognition/classification, Reading, System thinking, Probability Learning, partner interaction, Supervised learning

Decision Making

Autoren: MD Abdul jobbar, jong

Schlagwörter: Clinical Decision-Making/methods, Decision Making, Clinical Decision-Making, Decision Making/physiology, Decision Making/ethics, Decision Making/radiation effects, Decision Support Systems, Management/ethics, Decision Making/drug effects, Decision Support Systems, Management, Clinical Decision-Making/ethics, Decision making support, Decision Making, Shared, Decision Making, Organizational, Decision Making, Computer-Assisted

Adaptation and Validation of Ethics in Health Care Questionnaire Version 2 (EHCQ-2) to European Portuguese

Autoren: Filipa Moreira Cecília Leão João Bessa et al.

Quelle: Acta Médica Portuguesa (2025)

Schlagwörter: Decision Making/ethics, Education, Medical, Undergraduate/ethics, Ethics, Medical, Portugal, Reproducibility of Results, Surveys and Questionnaires, Medicine, Medicine (General), R5-920

Dateibeschreibung: electronic resource

Relation: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/23531; https://doaj.org/toc/0870-399X; https://doaj.org/toc/1646-0758

Zugangs-URL: https://doaj.org/article/a294c1f889424170b890f72e8e160b01

Pareto Cube (Pareto³) Recursive Methodology for Strategic Analysis

Autoren: STAN, Adrian

Schlagwörter: 80/20 rule, Artificial intelligence, Root Cause Analysis/methods, Decision Making, MEC, systems thinking, 5 Whys, Decision Making/ethics, Pareto Principle, Root Cause Analysis/standards, Artificial Intelligence, strategic analysis, Minimal Ethical Code, Heuristics, Root Cause Analysis, Root Cause Analysis/history, Pareto Square, Decision Making, Shared, Problem Solving, Decision Making, Computer-Assisted, Pareto Cube

¿Libre albedrío o glioma? el caso Whitman y la zona gris de la imputabilidad

Autoren: Iacopinelli, Francisco

Schlagwörter: Social Cognition, Brain/physiopathology, Prefrontal Cortex, Glioma, Decision Making/ethics, Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control, Neuro-law, Criminal responsibility, Legal capacity, Thalamus, Neuroethics, Legal neuroscience, Diminished imputability, Charles Whitman, Penal law

Ethical conflicts in patient care situations of community pharmacists: a cross-sectional online survey

Autoren: Kathrin Wernecke Stephan Nadolny Jan Schildmann et al.

Quelle: Int J Clin Pharm

Schlagwörter: Male, Adult, ddc:610, Internet, Attitude of Health Personnel, Decision Making, Community Pharmacy Services, Middle Aged, Pharmacists, Conflict, Psychological, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Germany, Humans, Female, Patient Care, Ethics, Pharmacy, Decision Making/ethics [MeSH], Surveys and Questionnaires [MeSH], Pharmacy ethics, Aged [MeSH], Pharmacists/ethics [MeSH], Internet [MeSH], Ethics, Male [MeSH], Community pharmacy, Attitude of Health Personnel [MeSH], Cross-sectional study, Ethics, Pharmacy [MeSH], Research Article, Female [MeSH], Adult [MeSH], Humans [MeSH], Middle Aged [MeSH], Cross-Sectional Studies [MeSH], Conflict, Psychological [MeSH], Patient Care/ethics [MeSH], Community Pharmacy Services/ethics [MeSH], Ethical issues, Germany [MeSH], Young Adult [MeSH], Survey, Aged

Dateibeschreibung: application/pdf

Zugangs-URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39240277
https://repository.publisso.de/resource/frl:6498465

One R or the other – an experimental bioethics approach to 3R dilemmas in animal research

Autoren: Rodriguez Perez, C Shaw, DM Earp, BD et al.

Quelle: Med Health Care Philos
Medicine, health care, and philosophy, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 497-512

Schlagwörter: Animal Experimentation, 3R dilemmas, Experimental bioethics, Decision Making, Animals, Animal Experimentation/ethics, Humans, Bioethics, Morals, Decision Making/ethics, 3Rs principle, Animal research, Researchers' decision-making, Scientific Contribution

Dateibeschreibung: application/pdf

Zugangs-URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39153014
https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/df0a5374-fb14-4471-9fdc-2a37bab4a6b7
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-024-10221-y
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:f03baba1-0ec0-48ae-bdea-4fd932534434
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-024-10221-y
https://serval.unil.ch/notice/serval:BIB_FB1D6A73B262
https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_FB1D6A73B262.P001/REF.pdf
http://nbn-resolving.org/urn/resolver.pl?urn=urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_FB1D6A73B2625

Factors influencing obstetricians’ acceptance of termination of pregnancy beyond the first trimester: a qualitative study: a qualitative study

Autoren: De Meyer, Fien Chambaere, Kenneth Van de Velde, Sarah et al.

Weitere Verfasser: De Meyer, Fien Chambaere, Kenneth Van de Velde, Sarah et al.

Quelle: BMC Med Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics, Vol 26, Iss 1, Pp 1-16 (2025)
BMC medical ethics
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS

Schlagwörter: Adult, Male, Philosophy and Religion, Medical philosophy. Medical ethics, Attitude of Health Personnel, Obstetrics/ethics, Decision Making, Decision making/ethics, DECISION-MAKING, Factors, ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSIS, obstetricians, Obstetricians, PHYSICIANS, ABORTION, Sociology, Belgium, Pregnancy, Physicians/psychology, Physicians, Medicine and Health Sciences, Humans, HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS, PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS, Biology, Qualitative Research, R723-726, FETAL-ABNORMALITY, DISABILITY, Research, FETICIDE, Abortion, Induced, Middle Aged, EXPERIENCES, Abortion, Induced/ethics, Obstetrics, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Viability, Termination of pregnancy, Fetal anomaly, Health professionals, EoLC, Female, pregnancy, Human medicine, Law, qualitative research, Decision-making

Dateibeschreibung: application/pdf

Zugangs-URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40045316
https://doaj.org/article/75c0871347c047d580137653972de8be
https://hdl.handle.net/10067/2128380151162165141
https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docstore/d:irua:27821
https://biblio.vub.ac.be/vubir/(51d9237f-bebc-44d1-a1a2-8a590e8943ee).html
https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/01JPFCDT3DAA8SPJ4D9C4JFTTK
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01JPFCDT3DAA8SPJ4D9C4JFTTK
https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/01JPFCDT3DAA8SPJ4D9C4JFTTK/file/01JPFCH6FJN2HY64W7T010MPDX
http://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01186-5

Perceptions of ethical decision-making climate among clinicians working in European and US ICUs: differences between religious and non-religious healthcare professionals: differences between religious and non-religious healthcare professionals

Autoren: Hanne Irene Jensen Hans-Henrik Bülow Lucas Dierickx et al.

Weitere Verfasser: Hanne Irene Jensen Hans-Henrik Bülow Lucas Dierickx et al.

Quelle: BMC Med Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics, Vol 26, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2025)
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS

Schlagwörter: Male, Adult, Conflict, Medical philosophy. Medical ethics, Attitude of Health Personnel, Conflicts, Decision Making, Clinical Decision-Making, Social Sciences, Nurses, Terminal Care/ethics, Decision Making/ethics, Health Personnel/ethics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Physicians, Medicine and Health Sciences, Humans, Ethical climate, Intensive care unit, Prospective Studies, Terminal Care, R723-726, Research, Religion and Medicine, Middle Aged, Physicians/ethics, United States, Teamwork, Europe, Religion, Intensive Care Units, Cross-Sectional Studies, Inter-professional collaboration, Perception, Female, Decision-making, End-of-life

Dateibeschreibung: application/pdf

Zugangs-URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39910490
https://doaj.org/article/c1eed61b87a44a3180eb64e088cac439
https://portal.findresearcher.sdu.dk/da/publications/ddb203b5-c771-4610-a49e-1322d0f878c2
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01178-5
https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/01JKE08AAEWFC5H8DP155WVBYE
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01JKE08AAEWFC5H8DP155WVBYE
http://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01178-5
https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/01JKE08AAEWFC5H8DP155WVBYE/file/01JKE09S0B82ZF7465VVGTC1VX

Ethics and end-of-life in pediatric and neonatal ICUs: a systematic review of recommendations

Autoren: Spoljar, Diana Jankovic, Suncana Vrkic, Dina et al.

Quelle: BMC Palliat Care
BMC Palliative Care, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2025)

Schlagwörter: NICU, pediatrics, PICU, intensive care units, Culture, Decision Making, WITHDRAWING TREATMENT, CHILDREN, 1110 Nursing, DECISION-MAKING, Intensive Care Units, Pediatric, PALLIATIVE CARE, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, neonatal, Terminal Care / ethics, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal / organization & administration, 4205 Nursing, Terminal Care / methods, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Humans, guidelines, EUTHANASIA, Child, Decision Making / ethics, Ethics, Terminal Care, Science & Technology, Research, Infant, Newborn, RC952-1245, 4203 Health services and systems, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal / ethics, INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS, ethics, Health Care Sciences & Services, Special situations and conditions, Intensive Care Units, Pediatric / ethics, Health Policy & Services, Intensive Care Units, Pediatric / organization & administration, Terminal Care / standards, CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Gerontology, End-of-life, Decision-making

Dateibeschreibung: application/pdf

Zugangs-URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39905352
https://doaj.org/article/a54cb15901364a2d9fd4c82a169ffa67
https://bmcpalliatcare.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12904-024-01636-8
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01636-8
https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/20.500.12942/761562
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01636-8
https://doras.dcu.ie/30821/1/Ethics-and-endoflife-in-pediatric-and-neonatal-ICUs-a-systematic-review-of-recommendationsBMC-Palliative-Care.pdf

Women’s and Provider’s Moral Reasoning About the Permissibility of Coercion in Birth: A Descriptive Ethics Study

Autoren: Eichinger, Johanna Büchler, Andrea Arnold, Louisa et al.

Weitere Verfasser: Eichinger, Johanna Büchler, Andrea Arnold, Louisa et al.

Quelle: Health Care Anal

Schlagwörter: Adult, Health (social science), Coercion, Health Personnel, Decision Making, 610 Medicine & health, Morals, Issues, Interviews as Topic, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, 5. Gender equality, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, 10. No inequality, Health Policy, Parturition, Delivery, Obstetric, 2719 Health Policy, 3. Good health, 2910 Issues, Ethics and Legal Aspects, Personal Autonomy, 10222 Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, ethics and legal aspects, Original Article, Female, 3306 Health (social science), Decision Making/ethics [MeSH], Delivery, Obstetric/ethics [MeSH], Surveys and Questionnaires [MeSH], Coercion [MeSH], Female [MeSH], Health Personnel/psychology [MeSH], Adult [MeSH], Humans [MeSH], Medical ethics, Parturition/psychology [MeSH], Personal Autonomy [MeSH], Informed consent, Morals [MeSH], Autonomy, Health Personnel/ethics [MeSH], Childbirth, Delivery, Obstetric/psychology [MeSH], Interviews as Topic [MeSH], Switzerland [MeSH], Obstetrics, Pregnancy [MeSH], Switzerland

Dateibeschreibung: ZORA_s10728_024_00480_4.pdf - application/pdf

Zugangs-URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38261096
https://repository.publisso.de/resource/frl:6503667
https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/257320/
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-257320

Evaluating cognitive bias in clinical ethics supports: a scoping review

Autoren: Giaume, Louise Lamblin, Antoine Piñol-Domenech, Nathalie et al.

Weitere Verfasser: Giaume, Louise Lamblin, Antoine Piñol-Domenech, Nathalie et al.

Quelle: ISSN: 1472-6939 ; BMC Medical Ethics ; https://uca.hal.science/hal-04928624 ; BMC Medical Ethics, 2025, 26 (1), pp.16. ⟨10.1186/s12910-025-01162-z⟩.

Schlagwörter: Review, Mindfulness, Cognitive bias, Deliberation, Clinical ethical committees and supports, MESH: Decision Making / ethics, MESH: Ethics, Clinical, [SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences, [INFO.INFO-IR]Computer Science [cs]/Information Retrieval [cs.IR]

Relation: PUBMEDCENTRAL: PMC11780915

Verfügbarkeit: https://uca.hal.science/hal-04928624
https://uca.hal.science/hal-04928624v1/document
https://uca.hal.science/hal-04928624v1/file/Giaume2025_BiasReview.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01162-z

Why we Need a Notion of Conflict for Autonomous Traffic Agents

Autoren: Rakow, Astrid Collenette, Joe Schwammberger, Maike et al.

Schlagwörter: autonomous traffic agents conflict decision making ethics safety

Zugangs-URL: https://elib.dlr.de/205982/

Exploring end-of-life decision-making in China for disorders of consciousness

Autoren: Meiqi Li Benedetta Cecconi Olivia Gosseries et al.

Weitere Verfasser: Meiqi Li Benedetta Cecconi Olivia Gosseries et al.

Quelle: Ann Med
Annals of Medicine, Vol 56, Iss 1 (2024)

Schlagwörter: Male, Adult, Sciences sociales & comportementales, psychologie, China, Attitude of Health Personnel, Decision Making, Terminal Care/ethics, Decision Making/ethics, Young Adult, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Consciousness Disorders/therapy, Neurosciences & comportement, disorders of consciousness, Resuscitation Orders, Aged, Terminal Care, Neurosciences & behavior, Terminal Care/psychology, Medicine (all), decision-making, Middle Aged, ethics, do-not-resuscitation orders, Neurology, Withholding Treatment, Withholding Treatment/ethics, Social & behavioral sciences, psychology, Resuscitation Orders/ethics, Medicine, Consciousness Disorders, Female

Zugangs-URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39587778
https://doaj.org/article/b7660991879348cd8fe9c685a9c4c36f

'I think all of us should have […] much better training in ethics.' Ethical challenges in policy making during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from an interview study with Swiss policy makers and scientists

Autoren: Brall, C. Gille, F. Schlaufer, C. et al.

Quelle: BMC Med Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics, Vol 25, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2024)
BMC medical ethics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 129

Schlagwörter: Ethics, Policy advice, R723-726, Medical philosophy. Medical ethics, SARS-CoV-2, Research, Health Policy, Decision Making, Administrative Personnel, COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19, 06 humanities and the arts, 0603 philosophy, ethics and religion, Research Personnel, Interviews as Topic, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Policy making, Humans, COVID-19/epidemiology, Switzerland, Policy Making, Pandemics, Decision Making/ethics, Administrative Personnel/ethics, Qualitative Research, Research Personnel/ethics, Decision-making

Dateibeschreibung: application/pdf

Zugangs-URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39543543
https://doaj.org/article/40e029600ec24a76abb365ad7056ed42
http://nbn-resolving.org/urn/resolver.pl?urn=urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_F5D94C051F179
https://serval.unil.ch/notice/serval:BIB_F5D94C051F17
https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_F5D94C051F17.P001/REF.pdf

Ethical self-efficacy among healthcare professionals caring for people with dementia: a brief pre- and post-report on the CARE intervention: a brief pre- and post-report on the CARE intervention

Autoren: Frederik Schou-Juul Lucca-Mathilde Thorup Ferm Simon Kinch et al.

Quelle: BMC Med Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics, Vol 25, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2024)

Schlagwörter: Male, Adult, R723-726, Medical philosophy. Medical ethics, Attitude of Health Personnel, Research, Health Personnel, Decision Making, Dementia care ethics, Ethical decision-making, Dementia/therapy, Decision Making/ethics, Middle Aged, Self Efficacy, Health Personnel/ethics, Healthcare professionals, Humans, Dementia, Female, Ethical self-efficacy

Zugangs-URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39385234
https://doaj.org/article/36d5941b228f4b9fb2a62b4c19f3421e

End-of-life decisions and palliative care in surgical intensive care units

Autoren: Polona Gams Anja Kramarič Lozar Primož Gradišek et al.

Quelle: Liječnički vjesnik, Vol 146, Iss 11-12, Pp 391-396 (2024)

Schlagwörter: TERMINAL CARE, PALLIATIVE CARE, DECISION MAKING – ethics, WITHHOLDING TREATMENT – ethics, INTENSIVE CARE UNITS, Medicine (General), R5-920

Dateibeschreibung: electronic resource

Relation: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/473035; https://doaj.org/toc/0024-3477; https://doaj.org/toc/1849-2177

Zugangs-URL: https://doaj.org/article/e7e771abde78473aabbf66bd01b3df4d

Exploring end-of-life decision-making in China for disorders of consciousness.

Autoren: Li, Meiqi Cecconi, Benedetta Gosseries, Olivia et al.

Quelle: Annals of Medicine, 56 (1), 2423794 (2024-12)

Schlagwörter: Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, decision-making, disorders of consciousness, do-not-resuscitation orders, ethics, Humans, Male, China, Female, Adult, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Terminal Care/ethics, Terminal Care/psychology, Resuscitation Orders/ethics, Attitude of Health Personnel, Aged, Young Adult, Withholding Treatment/ethics, Decision Making/ethics, Consciousness Disorders/therapy, Consciousness Disorders, Decision Making, Resuscitation Orders, Terminal Care, Withholding Treatment, Medicine (all), Social & behavioral sciences, psychology, Neurosciences & behavior, Sciences sociales & comportementales, psychologie, Neurosciences & comportement

Relation: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/07853890.2024.2423794; urn:issn:0785-3890; urn:issn:1365-2060

Zugangs-URL: https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/328997

Co-Reasoning and Epistemic Inequality in AI Supported Medical Decision-Making

Autoren: Søren Holm Thomas Ploug

Quelle: Holm, S & Ploug, T 2024, 'Co-Reasoning and Epistemic Inequality in AI Supported Medical Decision-Making', American Journal of Bioethics, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 79-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2024.2377115
Holm, S & Ploug, T 2024, 'Co-Reasoning and Epistemic Inequality in AI Supported Medical Decision-Making', The American journal of bioethics, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 79-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2024.2377115

Schlagwörter: Knowledge, Artificial Intelligence/ethics, Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Decision-Making, Decision Making, Clinical Decision-Making/ethics, Humans, Decision Making/ethics

Dateibeschreibung: application/pdf

Zugangs-URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39226017
https://vbn.aau.dk/da/publications/1c05da59-5f0a-404b-9ace-239ed2c9165d
https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2024.2377115
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203114040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/files/753244582/Co-Reasoning_and_Epistemic_Inequality_in_AI_Supported_Medical_Decision-Making.pdf