Search Results - "唐淑華"
-
1
Alternate Title: Design Student-Centered Textbooks to Enhance the Reading Literacy of Young People. (English)
Authors: 唐淑華
Source: Journal of Textbook Research; Aug2017, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p1-31, 31p
-
2
Alternate Title: The New Initiatives in Middle School Reading Activities: Inquiring the Big Questions through the Use of Multiple Texts to Read and Write. (English)
Authors: 唐淑華
Source: Journal of Education Research (1680-6360); 2017, Issue 279, p58-75, 18p
-
3
Alternate Title: Using Multiple Texts to Foster Junior High Students' Historical Understanding. (English)
Authors:
Source: Journal of Research in Education Sciences; Sep2015, Vol. 60 Issue 3, p63-94, 32p
-
4
Authors:
Contributors:
Subject Terms: 教學轉化, 跨界思維, 文史科目教學, 轉化, transformation in teaching, cross disciplinary thinking, language arts and history teaching, transformation in education
Relation: 教科書研究，4（2），87-120。; ntnulib_tp_A0114_01_003; http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/38789
-
5
Authors: et al.
Subject Terms: 學習共同體, 公開授課, 教師專業成長, 個案研究, learning community, public instruction, professional development, case study, edu, hisphilso
-
6
Authors:
Contributors:
Subject Terms: 一綱多本, 一綱一本, 有教無類法案, 教科書, multiple-texts, one-guideline-one-version, No Child Left Behind Act, textbooks, edu, relig
-
7
Authors: et al.
Contributors: et al.
Subject Terms: 公共圖書館數位資源, 英語閱讀教學, 閱讀動機, 閱讀態度, 閱讀理解, Public library digital resources, English reading instruction, Reading motivation, Reading attitude, Reading comprehension
File Description: 4375739 bytes; application/pdf
Relation: 一、中文文獻 文化部（2023）。關於擴大電子書計次借閱。https://ebook.moc.gov.tw/about/ 台灣雲端書庫（2024）。關於台灣雲端書庫。https://www.ebookservice.tw/#about/tcl 石宜平（2020）。以紙本與電子繪本進行英語教學對學童閱讀動機與閱讀理解之影響研究-以國小六年級學生為例。國立政治大學。 行政院（2018）。2030雙語國家政策發展藍圖。https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/448DE008087A1971/b7a931c4-c902-4992-a00c-7d1b87f46cea 吳訂宜、王就貞（2017）。身教式持續安靜晨讀對國小四年級學童閱讀理解能力與閱讀態度影響之研究。科學與人文研究，4(2)。https://doi.org/10.6535/JSH2017014203 宋曜廷、劉佩雲、簡馨瑩（2003）。閱讀動機量表的修訂及相關因素研究。測驗學刊，50(1)，47–71。https://doi.org/10.7108/PT.200306.0047 沈淑芬（2012）。網路資源融入國小五年級英語教學之研究。國立政治大學。 周珮甄（2013）。以SQ3R閱讀策略提昇國小學童閱讀理解能力之研究-以國小四年級為例。國立政治大學。 林子郁（2018）。具SOAR結構化筆記之合作數位閱讀標註對於學習者的閱讀理解理解、閱讀動機以及閱讀態度之影響研究。國立政治大學。 林宜蓉、林至誠（2012）。E-book Features that Adolescent English Learners in Taiwan Favored。國立政治大學。 林美秀（2016）。閱讀認知策略鷹架對於國中生英語閱讀理解理解之影響研究。國立政治大學。 林麗娟（2005）。數位學習與圖書館之投入。臺北市立圖書館館訊，22(4)，1–11。https://doi.org/10.29773/BTPL.200506.0001 凃宛妤（2023）。資訊科技融入英語課程教學對國小英語低成就學生之學習動機與學習理解之影響。國立政治大學。 凃惠文（2017）。運用電子書廣泛閱讀於國中英語補救教學：以新北市一所國中為例。國立政治大學。 姜亭安（2016）。國民中學學科教師於閱讀策略融入教學之研究 -以玉里國中為例。國立政治大學。 洪偉翔（2016）。公共圖書館電子資源支援新北市國小教學使用需求之調查研究。國立政治大學。 唐淑華（2016）。所有學生都能從經典閱讀活動受益嗎？談青少年的閱讀能力與閱讀偏好。教育研究月刊，015–031。 唐淑華（2017）。培養閱讀素養，何必遠求？從設計一本「以學生為主體」的中學課本開始。Jiao ke shu yan jiu，10(2)，001–032。https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.201708_10(2).01 徐秀慈（2022）。數位閱讀對雙語國小學童英語閱讀動機、閱讀態度與閱讀頻率影響之研究。國立政治大學。 徐筱玲、陳昭珍（2021）。廣泛閱讀對於英文閱讀程度影響之研究：引用Lexile架構。Hwa Kang English Journal, 001–028。 高翎紘、吳政叡（2016）。英語數位資源的學習動機與滿意度之研究：以輔仁大學大學部學生為例。圖資與檔案學刊，(89)，77-107。https://doi.org/10.6575/JILA.2016.89.04 國家圖書館（2024）。公共圖書館統計系統。https://publibstat.nlpi.edu.tw/Frontend/Dynamic/ImportantInfomation#tw 張春興（1993）。教育心理學研究的新取向—目的教育化·對象全人化·方法本土化。教育心理學報，(26)，1-21。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.19930701.1 張春興（2001）。現代心理學。台北市：東華。 張基成、林建良、顏啟芳（2011）。行動學習環境中英語學習持續意圖之便利性及好奇心影響研究。教育心理學報，26。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.19930701.1 教育部（2010）。閱讀理解策略教學手冊。https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/Website/1198/WebContent/38689/RFile/38689/106382.pdf 教育部（2013）。104 年度施政目標與重點。ce4ebdec-56f7-49f4-a5db-58967f411bae.pdf (moe.edu.tw) 教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf 教育部（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校語文領域─英語文。https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/26192/74206.pdf 教育部（2022）。推動中小學數位學習精進方案。https://pads.moe.edu.tw/pads_front/index.php 教育部（2024）。行動研究 - 教育百科 %7C 教育雲線上字典。https://pedia.cloud.edu.tw/Entry/WikiContent?title=%E8%A1%8C%E5%8B%95%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6&search=%E8%A1%8C%E5%8B%95%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6 曹純瓊、郝佳華（2010）。國小學童學前英語學習經驗對其學習動機與學業成就之影響。Jiao yu shi jian yu yan jiu = Journal of educational practice and research，23(2)，095–124。https://doi.org/10.6776/JEPR.201012.0095 陳奕霖、林麗娟（2022）。大學生英語學習動機與圖書館英語數位學習資源使用分析：以輔仁大學為例。圖資與檔案學刊，100。https://doi.org/10.6575/JILA.202206_(100).0003 陳新豐（2019）。教師對數學數位閱讀素養文本輔助國小高年級學童閱讀動機、理解與溝通互動之探討。國立屏東大學學報-教育類，3，073–110。 陳瑛芬（2016）。任務型教學活動對國小學童英語閱讀理解之理解。國立政治大學。 黃玫溱、林巧敏（2009）。推動閱讀計畫之構想與建議。Tu shu yu zi xun xue kan，70，048–060。https://doi.org/10.6575/JoLIS.2009.70.04 黃芷琪（2021）。國小英語學習扶助之問題與改進策略。臺灣教育評論月刊，10(2)，158–164。 黃國珍（2019）。閱讀素養：黃國珍的閱讀理解課, 從訊息到意義，帶你讀出深度思考力 / 黃國珍作（第一版）。親子天下股份有限公司。 黃瑞琴（2021）。質性教育研究方法 / 黃瑞琴著 (三版)。心理。 黃靜芳（2021）。推動「素養導向」閱讀教學的探討。臺灣教育評論月刊，10(8)。 葉奕君（2006）。閱讀策略教學對國中生英文閱讀能力之理解。國立政治大學。 葉荃芸（2021）。身教式持續安靜閱讀對學生閱讀態度、閱讀動機及學習理解影響之研究。國立政治大學。 鄒文莉（2003）。說故事英語教學與國小英語學習。師大學報。人文與社會科學類，48(1)，053–067。https://doi.org/10.6210/JNTNULL.2003.48(1).04 劉葳蕤（2022）。英語閱讀教學對閱讀理解與情意表現之後設分析。國立政治大學。 劉麗萍（2015）。閱讀策略教學對於國小高年級學童社會領域學習理解影響之研究。國立政治大學。 蔡清田（2000）。教育行動研究 / 蔡清田著（初版）。五南。 黎瓊麗、莊筱玉、傅敏芳（2006）。國小學童英語學習動機量表之編製。高應科大人文社會科學學報，3，141–167。https://doi.org/10.29888/KUASJHSS.200607.0007 蕭伊伶（2022）。廣泛閱讀對於國小學童英語閱讀動機、頻率及態度之影響。國立政治大學。 謝幸芳（2017）。國小六年級學生閱讀環境、閱讀行為及閱讀態度之研究：以澎湖縣為例。國立政治大學。 羅貝珍（2010）。應用點讀筆提升英語朗讀流暢度、學習動機及學習滿意度研究。國立政治大學。 鐘樹椽、陳貞蓉（2004）。資訊融入英語閱讀教學－網路電子繪本教學資源與策略。教師之友，45(5)。https://doi.org/10.7053/TF.200410.0003 二、英文文獻 Aghaie, R., & Zhang, L. J. (2012). Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students’ reading performance and strategy transfer. Instructional Science, 40(6), 1063–1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9202-5 Al-Qallaf, C. L., & Al-Mutairi, A. S. R. (2016). Digital literacy and digital content supports learning: The impact of blogs on teaching English as a foreign language. Electronic Library, 34(3), 522–547. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-05-2015-0076 Andrei, M. (2018). Science shows what’s the best time to learn a foreign language. ZME Science. https://www.zmescience.com/medicine/mind-and-brain/when-learn-foreign-language-01052018/ Baron, N. S. (2014). How E-Reading Threatens Learning in the Humanities. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 60(41). Burrows, L. (2012). The Effects of Extensive Reading and Reading Strategies on Reading Self-Efficacy. Çalışkan, E. F., & Ulaş, A. H. (2022). The Effect of Parent-Involved Reading Activities On Primary School Students Reading Comprehension Skills, Reading Motivation, and Attitudes Towards Reading. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 14(4), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2022.260 Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., Dicenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.onf.545-547 Colton, J. (2021). Digital technologies and inclusive literacy teaching: A response. Literacy Learning, 29(1), 24–27. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior / Edward L. Deci and Richard M. Ryan. Plenum. Duffy, G. G. (1993). Rethinking Strategy Instruction: Four Teachers’ Development and Their Low Achievers’ Understandings. Elementary School Journal, 93(3), 231–247. Duffy, G. G., & Roehler, L. R. (1989). Improving classroom reading instruction : a decision-making approach / Gerald G. Duffy, Laura R. Roehler. (2nd ed.). Random House. Ece Demir‐Lira, Ö., Applebaum, L. R., Goldin‐Meadow, S., & Levine, S. C. (2019). Parents’ early book reading to children: Relation to children’s later language and literacy outcomes controlling for other parent language input. Developmental Science, 22(3), e12764-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12764 Gardner, R. C., Masgoret, A.-M., & Tremblay, P. F. (1999). Home Background Characteristics and Second Language Learning. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(4), 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X99018004004 Goh, D. H.-L., et al. (Eds.). (2007). Asian digital libraries. Looking back 10 years and forging new frontiers: 10th International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries, ICADL 2007, Hanoi, Vietnam, December 10-13, 2007. Proceedings. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Gonzalo, J., et al. (Eds.). (2006). Research and advanced technology for digital libraries (Vol. 4172): 10th European Conference, EDCL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17-22, 2006, Proceedings. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag GmbH. Goodman, K. S. (1982). Language and literacy: The selected writings of Kenneth S. Goodman; edited and introduced by Frederick V. Gollasch. Routledge & Kegan Paul. Green, L. S. (2013). Language learning through a lens: The case for digital storytelling in the second language classroom. School Libraries Worldwide, 19(2), 23–36. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (1999). How Motivation Fits Into a Science of Reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_1 Hu, B. Y., Wu, H., Curby, T. W., Wu, Z., & Zhang, X. (2018). Teacher–child interaction quality, attitudes toward reading, and literacy achievement of Chinese preschool children: Mediation and moderation analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 68, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.09.004 Hu, B. Y., Xitao, F., Li, K., & Leng Ieong, S. S. (2015). Why is group teaching so important to Chinese children’s development? Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 40(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911504000102 Hukill, G. S., Arnold, J. M., & Klein, J. T. (2017). Reading in the digital age: A case study in faculty and librarian collaboration. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 24(2–4), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2017.1336143 Isaacs, D. (2021). Bilingual children. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 57(3), 316–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.15051 Khomo, M. P., Naicker, N., Chisita, C. T., & Rajkoomar, M. (2023). Factors contributing to the successful development and use of mobile digital libraries: A systematic literature review. Digital Library Perspectives, 39(3), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-08-2022-0062 Kim, H. (2016). The Relationships Between Korean University Students’ Reading Attitude, Reading Strategy Use, and Reading Proficiency. Reading Psychology, 37(8), 1162–1195. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2016.1193581 Kunter, M., Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (2007). Effective classroom management and the development of subject-related interest. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 494–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.002 Lambert, W. E., Tucker, G. R., & ANGLEJAN, A. D. (1973). An Innovative Approach to Second Language Learning: The St. Lambert Experiment. Études de linguistique appliquée, 10, 90–99. Liao, C.-Y., & Wang, T.-H. (2016). Reflections on the Integration of Mobile Learning in School Teaching Practice. Journal of Education Research, 265, 30–43. Marinak, B. A., & Gambrell, L. B. (2010). Reading Motivation: Exploring the Elementary Gender Gap. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49(2), 129–141. Mayer, R. E. (2010). Applying the science of learning to medical education: Applying the science of learning. Medical Education, 44(6), 543–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03624.x McKenna, M. C., Conradi, K., Lawrence, C., Jang, B. G., & Meyer, J. P. (2012). Reading Attitudes of Middle School Students: Results of a U.S. Survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(3), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.021 McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reading Comprehension Strategies : Theories, Interventions, and Technologies. Taylor & Francis Group. Nejad, B., & Mahmoodi-Shahrebabaki, M. (2015). Effects of Metacognitive Strategy Instruction on the Reading Comprehension of English Language Learners through Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach (CALLA). International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 3, 133–164. https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.463 Pecjak, S., & Peklaj, C. (2006). DIMENSIONS OF READING MOTIVATION AND READING ACHIEVEMENT IN 3RD AND 7TH GRADE STUDENTS. Studia Psychologica, 48(1), 11–30. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 Results: Executive Summary. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46619703.pdf Saracho, O. N., & Spodek, B. (1998). A play foundation for family literacy. International Journal of Educational Research, 29(1), 41–50. Author. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(98)00012-3 Tammaro, A. M., Tomaiuolo, M., Mordonini, M., Calderini, L., & D’Alessandro, P. (2023). What Do Users Think of the Digital Library? Analyzing Community’s Sentiment during Covid-19. The International Information & Library Review, 55(1), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2023.2159620 Teng, (Mark) Feng. (2020). The benefits of metacognitive reading strategy awareness instruction for young learners of English as a second language. Literacy (Oxford, England), 54(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12181 Wallace, C. (2013). Literacy and the bilingual learner: Texts and practices in London schools / Catherine Wallace. Palgrave Macmillan. Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of Children’s Motivation for Reading to the Amount and Breadth of Their Reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420 Wu, S., Franken, M., & Witten, I. H. (2010). Supporting collocation learning with a digital library. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220903532971 Ying-Chun, S., & Reynolds, B. L. (2018). Exploring strong and weak EFL readers’ strategy use after a reading strategy and extensive reading instructional intervention: A think-aloud analysis. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 31(1), 345–377. https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.16032.shi Zhang, Z., & Webb, S. (2019). The Effects of Reading Bilingual Books on Vocabulary Learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 31(1), 109-.; G0107913013; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/152681; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/152681/1/301301.pdf
-
8
-
9
Authors:
Contributors:
Subject Terms: 閱讀理解, 寫作表現, 知識翻新, 知識論壇, reading comprehension, writing performance, knowledge building, Knowledge Forum
File Description: 1713512 bytes; application/pdf
Relation: 王萬清（1997）。國語科教學理論與實際。臺北市：師大書苑。\n王詩妮、吳東光與孟瑛如（2014）多媒體註解輔助低閱讀能力學生線上閱讀理解之成效研究。臺灣科技大學人文社會學報，10(4)，333-352。\n王瑀（2004）。以同儕互評與討論提升小六學童之寫作表現~以行動學習輔具教室為例（未出版碩士論文）。國立中央大學，桃園市。\n王德蕙、李奕璇、曾芬蘭與宋曜廷（2013）「國民中學學生基本學力測驗寫作測驗」信度與效度分析研究。測驗學刊，60(1)，151-184。\n王瓊珠主編（2010）。故事結構教學與分享閱讀。臺北：心理文化出版。\n朱璟淳（2012）。電腦支援合作學習融入國小閱讀理解之研究—以說明文體為例（未出版碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。\n吳宜貞（2002）。家庭環境因素對兒童閱讀能力影響之探討。教育心理學報，34(1)，1-19。\n吳錦勳（2007）。越寫越聰明。天下雜誌，1012，84-93。\n呂尚芝（2010）。概念構圖寫作教學策略對不同語文能力國小四年級學生寫作表現之影響（未出版碩士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。\n李榮哲（2010）。 高中生同儕回饋對作文表現的影響（未出版碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\n杜淑貞（2001）。小學作文教學探究。臺北市：文津。\n周文君（2002）。「多元智能統整-合作-反省思考」寫作教學對國小學童寫作態度與寫作表之影響（未出版碩士論文）。國立屏東師範學院，屏東縣。\n周惠菁（2011）。美國新一波教育革命──寫作真的很重要。天下雜誌。取自http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5009267\n孟瑛如、吳東光、陳虹君（2014）。RTI 理念融入多媒體閱讀理解教材以提升一般生及閱讀低成就學生在閱讀及識字成效之教學研究，臺中教育大學學報，28(1)，1-23。\n岳修平（譯）（2001）。教學心理學：學習的認知基礎（原作者：E. D. Gagne, C. W. Yekovich, & F. R. Yekovich）。臺北：遠流文化。\n林秀玲（2008）。發問策略教學對學生提問能力與閱讀理解之影響——以國小四年級國語科教學為例（未出版碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學，臺北市。\n林清山（譯）（1990）。教育心理學──認知取向（原作者：R. E. Mayer）。臺北：遠流出版公司。\n林義雄與陳澤民（譯）（1996）。數學心理學（原作者：R.R.Skemp）。台北：九章出版社。\n邱景玲（2007）。鷹架式寫作教學對國小學童寫作成效影響之研究（未出版碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學，臺北市。\n信世昌（2009）。教育科技在語文教育之應用。載於臺灣教育傳播暨科技學會（主編）教育科技理論與實務（頁163-183）。臺北市；學富文化。\n柯華葳（2007）。教出閱讀力。臺北：天下雜誌。\n柯華葳（2009）。教出閱讀力2。臺北：天下雜誌。\n柯華葳、詹益綾、張建妤與游婷雅（2006）。臺灣四年級學生閱讀素養（PIRLS 2006 報告）。中央大學學習與教學研究所。\n洪月女（2009）以古德曼的閱讀理論探討中英文閱讀之異同。新竹教育大學人文社會學報，3(1)，87-114。\n洪蘭（2002）。活化大腦，激發創造力。天下雜誌，海闊天空特刊，92-94。\n唐淑華（1991）。以多文本取向進行課外閱讀之規畫與運用，教育研究月刊，210，21-35。\n孫春在，林珊如（2007）。網路合作學習：數位時代的互動學習環境、教學與評量。台北：心理出版。\n涂亞鳳（2006）。心智繪圖寫作教學法對國中生語文創造力及寫作表現影響之研究。慈濟大學教育研究所教學碩士論文（未出版碩士論文）。慈濟大學，花蓮縣。\n國民教育社群網（2012）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。取自http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php。\n國立臺灣師範大學心理與教育測驗研究發展中心(2015)。寫作測驗評分規準。取自http://cap.ntnu.edu.tw/exam_31.html。\n張淑慧（1998）。合作學習對國小五年級學童網路閱讀理解及策略影響研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學，嘉義縣。\n張新仁（1992）。寫作教學研究。高雄：復文圖書有限公司。\n許宜文（2007）。作文數位教材教學對國小學童寫作態度與寫作表現影響之研究（未出版碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學，臺北市。\n郭生玉、陳鳳如（1995）。整合性過程導向寫作教學法對國小兒童寫作品質及寫作歷程的影響。師大學報，40，1-36。\n陳秀玲（2010）。資訊科技融入閱讀教學對學生閱讀理解效應之行動研究（未出版碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學，臺北市。\n陳佳音（2005）。線上閱讀討論對國小學童之閱讀理解能力與閱讀態度影響之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。\n陳昭智（2013）。運用心智圖法對國中生國語文閱讀理解之影響探究（未出版碩士論文）。國立暨南大學課程教學與科技研究所，南投。\n陳滿銘（2013）語文能力與讀寫互動關係。中等教育，64(3)，17-34。\n陳鳳如（1994）。閱讀與寫作，整合的教與學。學生輔導。62，20-29。\n陳鳳如（2004）。寫作討論對大學生學術性論文寫作品質及寫作歷程的影響─從探索、閱讀到寫作。師大學報，49(1)，139-158。\n陳鳳如（2012）。自我詢問檢核策略的介入對讀者覺察能力的實驗效果。新竹教育大學教育學報。30(1)，39-69。\n陳鴻基（2008）。「合作式電腦心智繪圖寫作教學」對國小四年級學生寫作成效與寫作態度之影響（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。\n曾世杰（2004）。聲韻覺識、唸名速度與中文閱讀障礙。臺北市：心理。\n曾祥芹（2001）。現代文章學引論。北京：中國文聯出版社。\n黃永和（2009）。情境學習與教學研究。臺北市：國立編譯館。\n黃思華（2014）。互動式電子書對原住民高中職學生閱讀理解能力之研究。教育科技與學習，2(2)，143-164。\n黃筱雯、蔡家姍（2009）。國中學生語言能力、閱讀理解能力及寫作表現三者之關係研究：以桃園縣為例。教育科學期刊，4(2)，118-160。\n葉玉珠（2002）。高層次思考教學設計的要素分析。國立中山大學通識教育學報，創刊號，75-101。\n葉玉珠、高源令、修慧蘭、陳世芬、曾慧敏、王珮玲、陳惠萍著（2010）。教育心理學。臺北：心理出版社。\n詹志禹（2004）。臺灣發明家的內在動機、思考取向及環境機會：演化論的觀點。 教育與心理研究，27(4），775-806。\n詹志禹主編（2002）。建構論：理論基礎與教育應用。臺北：遠流文化。\n廖本裕（2010）。寫作歷程模式數位教學平台之設計與實施成效之研究。教育學刊，34，109-141。\n蔡怡玉（2005）。電腦輔助教學對國小閱讀理解困難學生教學成效之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立台南大學，臺南市。\n賴麗珍（譯）(2007)。創意思考教學的 100個點子(100 Ideas for Teaching Creativity)（原作者：Stephen Bowkett）。臺北市：心理。\n錢昭君（2010）。心智圖寫作教學方案對國小學生創造力及寫作表現之影響（未出版碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學，臺北市。\n瞿吟楨（2012）。編織式創意記敘文寫作教學。臺北市：秀威資訊。\n羅景瓊、蘇照雅（2009）。網路同步學習中實施腦力激盪法激發創意思考之研究。生活科技教育月刊，42(5)，58-70。\n\n \nAnderson, R. C. (1984). Role of reader`s schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In R. C. Anderson, J. Osborn, and R. Tierney (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools (pp. 372 – 384). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.\nBereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). An attainable version of high literacy: Approaches to teaching higher-order skills in reading and writing. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(1), 9–30.\nBereiter, C. (2002).Constructivism, Socioculturalism, and Popper’s World 3. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 21-23.\nBereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. \nBereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2010). Can children really create knowledge? Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1).\nChall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovic College.\nChan, C. K.K., Brutis, P. J., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Constructive activity in learning from text. American educational research journal, 29(1), 99-118.\nFlower,L.,& Hayes. J.R.(1981a) A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing .College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387.\nGarrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.\nGibson, E. J., & Levin, H.(1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT\nGordon, C. (1990). Changes in readers’ and writers’ metacognitive knowledge: Some observations. Reading Research and Instruction, 30 (1), 1-14.\nGraesser, A.C. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. In D. McNamara (Ed.), Theories of text comprehension: The importance of reading strategies to theoretical foundations of reading comprehension (pp. 3-26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.\nHaneda, M., & Wells, G. (2000). Writing in knowledge-building communities. Research in the Teaching of English, 34 (3), 430-457.\nHayes, J. R. (2000). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In R. Indrisano, & J.R. Sauire (eds), Perspectives on Writing: Research, Theory, and Practice (pp. 6-45). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.\nHayes, R. (1996). A New Framework for Understanding Cognition and Affect in Writing. In Levy, C.M. & Ransdell, S. (Eds), The Science of Writing. Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications. London: Routledge.\nHillocks, G. (1986). What Works in Teaching Composition: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Treatment Studies. American Journal of Education, 39(1), 133-170.\nHmelo-Silver, Cindy E.; Barrows, Howard S.(2008) Facilitating Collaborative Knowledge Building. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 48-94.\nHong, H.-Y., & Sullivan, F. R. (2009). Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 613-627.\nHong, H. Y., & Sullivan, F. R. (2009). Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation. Educational Technology Research & Development, 57(5), 613-627.\nJuel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437-447.\nKarau, Steven J.; Williams, Kipling D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (4): 681–706.\nKintsch, E. (1990). Macroprocesses and microprocesses in the development of summarization skill. Cognition and Instruction, 7 (3), 161-195.\nKintsch, W., & Welsch, D.M. (1988). The construction-integration model: a framework for studying memory for text. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.) Relating memory and data: essay on human memory (pp. 1-28). NJ: Erlbaum.\nKnapper, C.K. & Cropley A.J. (2000). Lifelong learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page. \nKozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179-212.\nLaBerge, D.,& Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.\nNonaka, I., & Konno, N.(1998). The Concept of `Ba`: Building a foundation for knowledge creation, California Management Review, 40(3). 40-54.\nNystrand, M. (1986). The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers. UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.\nOECD. (2000). Literacy in the Information Age : Final Report of the International Adult Literacy Survey. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/skills-beyond-school/41529765.pdf\nOECD. (2011). PISA 2009 Results: What students know and can do(Volume I). Paris: Author. Press.\nOlson, D.R. (1997). Talking about text and culture of literacy. In B. Davis & D. Corson (Eds.), Oral discourse and education (pp.1-9). Boston, MA: Kluwer.\nOsborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination : principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. New York: Scribner.\nPhillips, L. M., & Norris, S. P. (2009). Bridging the gap between the language of science and the language of school science through the use of adapted primary literature. Science Education, 39, 313-319.\nPolman, J. L. (2004). Dialogic activity structures for project-based learning environments. Cognition and Instruction, 22 (4), 431-466.\nRobert G. Roth (1987). The evolving audience: alternatives to audience accommodation. College Composition and Communication, 38(1), 47-55.\nRodamn, G.(1965). Pre-writing: The stage of discovery in the writing process. College Composition Communication, 16, 106-112.\nRumelhart, D.E. (1985). Toward an interactive model of reading. In Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading. 3rd edition. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, and P.D. Pearson (Eds.) Newark, DE: International Reading Association.\nScardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.) Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67-98). Chicago: Open Court.\nScardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum. In education and Technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183-192). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.\nScardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1983). The development of evaluative, diagnostic, and remedial capabilities in children`s composing. The psychology of written language: Developmental and educational perspectives, (pp. 67-95). New York: Wiley.\nScardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1986). Research on written composition. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. NY: Macmillan Publishing Company. \nScardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1987). An Attainable Version of High Literacy: Approaches to Teaching Higher-Order Skills in Reading and Writing. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(1), 9-30.\nScardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1999). Schools as knowledge building organizations. In D. Keating & C. Hertzman (Eds.), Today’s children, tomorrow’s society: The developmental health and wealth of nations (pp. 274-289). New York: Guilford.\nScardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1999). Schools as knowledge building organizations. In D. Keating & C. Hertzman (Eds.), Today’s children, tomorrow’s society: The developmental health and wealth of nations (pp. 274-289). New York: Guilford.\nScardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003a). Knowledge building environments: Extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work. In A. DiStefano, K.E. Rudestam, & R. Silverman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distributed learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.\nScardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97-118).New York: Cambridge University Press.\nSo, H. J., Seah, L. H., Toh-Heng, H. L. (2009). Designing collaborative knowledge building environments accessible to all learners: Impacts and design challenges. Computers and Education, 54, 479-490.\nTan, S. C. (2010). Developing 21st century teachers as a knowledge builder. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 1–8.\nVon Glasersfeld, E.(1989). Constructivism in education. In T.Husen & N. Postlethwaite (eds.), International encyclopedia education (pp.11-12). Oxford, England: Pergamon.\nWeinstein, C. S. (1991). The classroom as a social context for learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 493-525.\nWhat does a Knowledge Building classroom look like? by (2015, Dec 25).[Online forum comment]. Retrieved from http://ikit.org/professionaldevelopment/what-does-a-knowledge-building-classroom-look-like\nWhite, B. (1989). A microworld-based approach to science education. Newton, MA: Bolt Beranek & Newman.\nWiely, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 301-311.\nWittrock, M. C. (1991). Generative teaching of comprehension. The Elementary School Journal, 92(2), 169-184.\nWixson, K. K., & Peters, C. W. (1984). Reading redefined: A Michigan Reading Association position paper. Michigan Reading Journal, 17, 4-7.\nWong, B.Y.L., & Jone. W.(1982). Increasing metacomprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questioning training, Learning Disability Quarterly, 5(3), 228-240.\nZhang, J., & Sun. Y. (2011). Reading for idea advancement in a Grade 4 knowledge building community. Instructional Science, 39(4), 429–452.\nZhang, J., & Sun. Y., Scardamalia, M.(2010). Knowledge building and vocabulary growth over two years, Grades 3 and 4. Instructional Science, 38(2), 141-171.; G0103152006; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/99655; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/99655/1/200601.pdf
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science